Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “CERTIFICATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

Certification Rules and Standards Review

This report characterizes the certification practices for electric propulsion systems by modeling changes to current engine and propeller certification practices (14 CFR 23, 33 and 35 and means of compliance in standards developed by ASTM Committee F39 and F44). Industry technology paths are varied, so this report focuses on insights from the NASA X-57 Maxwell Distributed Electric Propulsion flight demonstrator system technology project. There are 122 sections of the regulation reviewed, where 28 needed tailoring or revision. A second report will examine the regulations to the X-57 system development products. A final report will describe a general regulatory gaps method for new vehicle concepts.

Schlickenmaier, Herbert↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Next Generation Durability and Damage Tolerance to Support Certification of Flight Hardware

Durability and Damage Tolerance (D&DT), as currently applied to flight hardware throughout the Agency, is based on continuum and similitude assumptions and does not consider local material properties, environments and responses. These limitations impact our ability to support certification of new component designs, material systems and manufacturing approaches. The primary concern in this Engineering R&A plan is related to the imminent proliferation of parts produced by additive manufacturing (AM). These parts are being advocated by NASA’s suppliers for use on a myriad of flight hardware because of their design flexibility and cost advantages. AM provides opportunities to reduce part counts through complex geometry and reduce manufacturing costs of low volume parts. However, AM materials have some notable metallurgical and microstructural differences compared to traditionally fabricated materials. One of the challenges for the acceptance of AM is the greater tendency for a deleterious defect state, most commonly in the form of porosity, to exist in AM parts. Though this defect state is typically reduced through a hot isostatic pressing (HIP) processing step, the structural performance risks associated with the remaining defects and HIP-healed features is not known. Potential fracture control issues that must be resolved stem from the real possibility that an unhealed defect or a closed defect with less than pristine strength remains at a fracture critical location after HIP. As a result, NASA and the entire aerospace community have been confronted with the need to develop a robust and relevant certification methodology to enable safe implementation of these components. The present work is an important step toward positioning NASA to credibly respond to vendors’ push to implement this new AM materials technology by improving our understanding of AM processing and performance and transitioning that research-based understanding to next-generation engineering capabilities.

Edward H Glaessgen↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Class A Certification of Core Flight Software (cFS)

NASA Gateway program has named cFS as the software architecture for the vehicle. The core CFS team (GSFC+JSC) is tasked to develop a certifiable release of the cFS bundle, by components, as class A, safety-critical flight software. It is to be available to all Gateway software developers, including our element vendors and international partners. Its availability & usage will be as stated by the Gateway User Agreement license. In this presentation, we will describe our general certification process, and more importantly, our certification artifacts that can be re-run to certify cFS on different platforms. Our goal is to also make available these certifiable packages to the open source community, specifically for cFE, OSAL and certain cFS applications and libraries that are currently hosted on NASA github (https://github.com/nasa).

Tam M Ngo↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Class A Certification of Core Flight Software (cFS)

NASA Gateway program has named cFS as the software architecture for the vehicle. The core CFS team (GSFC+JSC) is tasked to develop a certifiable release of the cFS bundle, by components, as class A, safety-critical flight software. It is to be available to all Gateway software developers, including our element vendors and international partners. Its availability & usage will be as stated by the Gateway User Agreement license. In this presentation, we will describe our general certification process, and more importantly, our certification artifacts that can be re-run to certify cFS on different platforms. Our goal is to also make available these certifiable packages to the open source community, specifically for cFE, OSAL and certain cFS applications and libraries that are currently hosted on NASA github (https://github.com/nasa).

Tam M Ngo↗
NASA NTRS2022

Certification Guidelines For Crewed Inflatable Softgoods Structures

To help guide NASA and industry in the development and certification of crewed softgoods structures, this document details the fundamental testing, data, and documents recommended for the evaluation of a softgoods inflatable designed for crewed occupation in a space environment. This is not a requirements document but supports NASA-imposed standards used for certification. This document is intended to support and guide the development of programmatic requirements to demonstrate a design has followed a systematic and comprehensive design, fabrication, and test program.

softgoods↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPS Certification by Analysis: Model-Driven Characterization of Properties and Failure in Woven Thermal Protection Systems

Woven, ablative thermal protection system (TPS) materials provide a robust option for aggressive (re)entries and thus have been baselined for the upcoming Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission’s Earth Entry System (EES). The reliability requirements for MSR-EES necessitate understanding of material property variability, which could be significant given the complex structure and anisotropic nature of properties in TPS weaves, as well as the response to potential impact with micrometeoroids or orbital debris during the EES re-entry. The TPS Certification by Analysis effort within the Entry Systems Modeling project seeks to provide computational models and analyses that support the certification against such material-based risks. For the present talk, focus will be given to the characterization of baseline woven TPS material properties and mechanical failure limits, which entails (1) use of computational techniques (e.g., machine learning) to interpret computed tomography images of the weave to generate representative structural models and (2) application of multiscale material modeling approaches to characterize thermomechanical and failure properties.

Justin B. Haskins↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Certification Concepts for AI/ML Systems

This presentation goes over some of the tools developed at NASA Ames in the Robust Software Engineering group for the assurance and certification of autonomous systems. The research themes presented include improving safety and risk assessment as early as possible in the lifecycle, elicitation and formalization of requirements to facilitate traceability throughout the lifecycle, especially when formal methods are used, algorithms, tools and techniques for the V&V of ML-enabled systems, advanced testing, use of runtime monitoring to ease use of untrusted components, and contribution to draft regulatory standards and assistance in producing and presenting certification evidences.

Autonomy↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Combining Data with Physical Knowledge for Uncertainty Quantification in Certification and Reliability Analysis

Unifying empirical data with predictive models can enable engineering cost-savings through certification by analysis and reliability-based design. Both concepts require rigorous uncertainty quantification (UQ) and robust understanding and treatment of relevant physics. Combining sampling-based UQ algorithms with high-fidelity simulations creates a computational bottleneck that is often alleviated through the use of machine learning (ML). ML can be used to create computationally efficient surrogates for simulations of complex or high-dimensional physical interactions (e.g., multi-phase interactions associated with melt pools in laser powder bed fusion or spatially-dependent material properties in functionally graded materials). However, negative side effects of ML may include a lack of interpretability and negative correlation between event rarity and simulation accuracy due to a lack of training data. As such, it is important to infuse ML algorithms with physics-based guardrails to provide confidence in their predictions. This talk will provide a brief review of recent NASA research at this intersection of physics-based simulation, ML, and UQ with a focus on certification and reliability analysis.

uncertainty quantification↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development, Build and Certification of the Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) Hardware for the NASA Exploration Toilet

On longer range exploration missions, the mass and volume of critical hardware and consumables that will be needed to support crew will pose a big stowage challenge. This includes the hardware needed for the collection and storage of human metabolic waste. The amount of stowage needed for this hardware both before (empty) and after (full) use will be a significant burden on the overall spacecraft habitable volume, layout, and design. To help with this challenge, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed a collapsible canister for the collection and containment of fecal deposits. The Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) is an alternative to the exploration toilet hard-sided fecal canister. The AFC is collapsible in its empty state which is a volume benefit to smaller vehicles on longer missions. In addition, the use of lighter-weight materials provides a reduction in mass of the overall container. This paper will provide a summary of the AFC design including final flight design and build, acceptance and qualification testing completed, final certification and delivery and forward plans for a technology demonstration with the exploration toilet on the International Space Station (ISS). In addition, a summary of issues and final resolution encountered during flight build and testing will also be provided. As part of the acceptance and certification process for AFC, the hardware was also put into several rounds of odor testing with the support of the White Sands Test Facility (WSTF). The details, planning and anomalies identified during odor testing will also be summarized in this paper. Finally, a brief overview of potential future design upgrades including changes to address any crew feedback from the ISS demonstration will be discussed.

Fecal Canister↗
NASA NTRS2024

Agency Additive Manufacturing (AM) Certification Support Team (AACT) Risk Reduction – Safe Life Category: Fracture Control Framework for Un-inspectable Fracture Critical AM Parts

The NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) was requested to support the development of a governing philosophy to provide a consistent and systematic approach for fracture control certification of additive manufacturing (AM) hardware that cannot be reliably inspected. The overall goal of the NESC assessment was to make progress toward a framework for general certification of un-inspectable fracture critical AM hardware and toward approaches for evaluating risks associated with these components. This report contains the results of the assessment.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development, Build and Certification of the Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) Hardware for the NASA Exploration Toilet

On longer range exploration missions, the mass and volume of critical hardware and consumables that will be needed to support crew will pose a big stowage challenge. This includes the hardware needed for the collection and storage of human metabolic waste. The amount of stowage needed for this hardware both before (empty) and after (full) use will be a significant burden on the overall spacecraft habitable volume, layout, and design. To help with this challenge, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed a collapsible canister for the collection and containment of fecal deposits. The Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) is an alternative to the exploration toilet hard-sided fecal canister. The AFC is collapsible in its empty state which is a volume benefit to smaller vehicles on longer missions. In addition, the use of lighter-weight materials provides a reduction in mass of the overall container. This paper will provide a summary of the AFC design including final flight design and build, acceptance and qualification testing completed, final certification and delivery and forward plans for a technology demonstration with the exploration toilet on the International Space Station (ISS). In addition, a summary of issues and final resolution encountered during flight build and testing will also be provided. As part of the acceptance and certification process for AFC, the hardware was also put into several rounds of odor testing with the support of the White Sands Test Facility (WSTF). The details, planning and anomalies identified during odor testing will also be summarized in this paper. Finally, a brief overview of potential future design upgrades including changes to address any crew feedback from the ISS demonstration will be discussed.

Fecal Canister↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development, Build and Certification of the Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) Hardware for the NASA Exploration Toilet

On longer range exploration missions, the mass and volume of critical hardware and consumables that will be needed to support crew will pose a big stowage challenge. This includes the hardware needed for the collection and storage of human metabolic waste. The amount of stowage needed for this hardware both before (empty) and after (full) use will be a significant burden on the overall spacecraft habitable volume, layout, and design. To help with this challenge, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed a collapsible canister for the collection and containment of fecal deposits. The Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) is an alternative to the exploration toilet hard-sided fecal canister. The AFC is collapsible in its empty state which is a volume benefit to smaller vehicles on longer missions. In addition, the use of lighter-weight materials provides a reduction in mass of the overall container. This paper will provide a summary of the AFC design including final flight design and build, acceptance and qualification testing completed, final certification and delivery and forward plans for a technology demonstration with the exploration toilet on the International Space Station (ISS). In addition, a summary of issues and final resolution encountered during flight build and testing will also be provided. As part of the acceptance and certification process for AFC, the hardware was also put into several rounds of odor testing with the support of the White Sands Test Facility (WSTF). The details, planning and anomalies identified during odor testing will also be summarized in this paper. Finally, a brief overview of potential future design upgrades including changes to address any crew feedback from the ISS demonstration will be discussed.

Fecal Canister↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Certification of Upper Air Sounding System to Support NASA Launch Operations

A new upper air sounding system (Vaisala MW51) has been installed at the United States Space Force’s Eastern Range (ER). The NASA Marshall Space Flight Center’s Natural Environments Branch has assessed MW51 test data from the ER to certify the new system for use in Artemis Program launch operations. Certification criteria are based on legacy system capabilities and vehicle design environments, and include criteria for wind, temperature, and relative humidity, as well as effective vertical resolution (EVR) of wind data. The test data consists of near simultaneous (within 15 seconds) releases of two MW51 sondes and one legacy system sonde. Difference statistics (root mean square) between MW51 and legacy system wind, temperature, and relative humidity data are assessed against the certification criteria. Wind data from dual MW51 releases are used in spectral/coherence analyses to assess the EVR criteria. The MW51 system must demonstrate it meets these criteria to be used in NASA Artemis launch operations.

Frank Leahy↗
NASA NTRS2022

NASA Commercial Crew Program Crew Transportation System Certificate of Flight Readiness Plan

NASA Commercial Crew Program (CCP) Crew Transportation System (CTS) Certification of Flight Readiness (CoFR) is the authorization granted by the Agency that certifies the flight readiness of a Commercial Provider’s CTS to conduct a flight test or mission to transport NASA Crew to and from the ISS. The Commercial Provider is responsible for developing and executing its plan for certifying the flight readiness of its CTS. The CCP with the International Space Station (ISS) Program must substantiate the Commercial Provider’s CoFR assertion to ensure compliance with NASA requirements and NASA Crew safety. NASA CCP CTS CoFR is the approval of the Commercial Provider’s evidence that: • The physical as-built CTS was produced, assembled, integrated, and tested within the approved production and operational constraints. • The mission specific requirements are enveloped within the certified CTS capabilities. • The CTS personnel are trained and certified to support the mission. • All aspects of the CTS are ready for the mission.

Certification of Flight Readiness↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flight Simulator Demonstration and Certification Implications of Powertrain Failure Mitigation in a Partial Turboelectric Aircraft

The Single-aisle Turboelectric AiRCraft with Aft Boundary Layer propulsor (STARC ABL) is a concept aircraft with a partial turboelectric powertrain. The complexity and integrated nature of the partial turboelectric powertrain architecture presents failure modes and hazards not found in conventional aircraft propulsion designs. Previously, various electrical and mechanical faults and associated recovery modes were demonstrated in a dynamic model of the powertrain. It was shown that certain faults were catastrophic without recovery logic, due specifically to the interaction of the subsystems. However, in each case, the logic, known as a reversionary control mode, enabled continued operation with assumed sufficient thrust to maintain safe flight. The current work evaluates the powertrain faults and recovery strategies using a full aircraft model in a piloted flight simulator, and places it in the context of current regulatory practice. Faults initiated in flight were successfully mitigated, with the accommodated aircraft subsequently evaluated against certification requirements for three-engine aircraft, which were shown to be appropriate for the STARC-ABL configuration.

STARC-ABL↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flight Simulator Demonstration and Certification Implications of Powertrain Failure Mitigation in a Partial Turboelectric Aircraft

The Single-aisle Turboelectric AiRCraft with Aft Boundary Layer propulsor (STARC ABL) is a concept aircraft with a partial turboelectric powertrain. The complexity and integrated nature of the partial turboelectric powertrain architecture presents failure modes and hazards not found in conventional aircraft propulsion designs. Previously, various electrical and mechanical faults and associated recovery modes were demonstrated in a dynamic model of the powertrain. It was shown that certain faults were catastrophic without recovery logic, due specifically to the interaction of the subsystems. However, in each case, the logic, known as a reversionary control mode, enabled continued operation with assumed sufficient thrust to maintain safe flight. The current work evaluates the powertrain faults and recovery strategies using a full aircraft model in a piloted flight simulator, and places it in the context of current regulatory practice. Faults initiated in flight were successfully mitigated, with the accommodated aircraft subsequently evaluated against certification requirements for three-engine aircraft, which were shown to be appropriate for the STARC-ABL configuration.

STARC-ABL↗
NASA NTRS2023

Flight Simulator Demonstration and Certification Implications of Powertrain Failure Mitigation in a Partial Turboelectric Aircraft

The Single-aisle Turboelectric AiRCraft with Aft Boundary Layer propulsor (STARC ABL) is a concept aircraft with a partial turboelectric powertrain. The complexity and integrated nature of the partial turboelectric powertrain architecture presents failure modes and hazards not found in conventional aircraft propulsion designs. Previously, various electrical and mechanical faults and associated recovery modes were demonstrated in a dynamic model of the powertrain. It was shown that certain faults were catastrophic without recovery logic, due specifically to the interaction of the subsystems. However, in each case, the logic, known as a reversionary control mode, enabled continued operation with assumed sufficient thrust to maintain safe flight. The current work evaluates the powertrain faults and recovery strategies using a full aircraft model in a piloted flight simulator, and places it in the context of current regulatory practice. Faults initiated in flight were successfully mitigated, with the accommodated aircraft subsequently evaluated against certification requirements for three-engine aircraft, which were shown to be appropriate for the STARC-ABL configuration.

certification↗