SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Human Landing System”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Feasibility Study of a Multi Tilt-rotor Aircraft as the Artemis Lunar Training Vehicle

The Lunar Landing Research Vehicles (LLRVs) and the Lunar Landing Training Vehicles (LLTVs) provided astronaut candidates for the Apollo program with essential experience and confidence required to complete the missions, and contributed to six successful manned landings on the moon. The primary challenge in terrestrial training was being able to replicate the ratio of bank angle to linear acceleration that a pilot would experience in lunar gravity. Presently, as the Artemis program seeks to return humans to the Moon by 2025, engineers are evaluating suitable platforms to serve as an In-Flight Trainer (IFT) or Artemis Lunar Training Vehicle (ALTV) for astronauts training in the task of manual landing. The program is investigating the viability of current technology in the field of electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) vehicles and is evaluating using a multi tilt-rotor aircraft platform as a candidate platform for a preliminary ALTV. The tilt-rotor capability enables the vehicle attitude to be decoupled from its flight path, which is a crucial requirement in realistically simulating lunar gravity on Earth. Other key considerations include compensating for a lack of aerodynamic forces while flying through the atmosphere of Earth, as well as the ability to simulate the dynamics of multiple different lander designs for the Human Landing System (HLS) program. This paper details the feasibility study and presents a preliminary flight control architecture for an IFT based on a notional multi tilt-rotor platform. The modeling-following control law, based on nonlinear dynamic inversion (NDI), removes the need for gain scheduling because the vehicle operates across a wide range of flight conditions. The inner-loop dynamic control allocation strategy consists of a static portion that is optimized offline for trim while compensating for the difference in gravity and a dynamic portion that is computed in real time. The reference model consists of the full closed-loop dynamics of a generic HLS design. The modularity of the flight control architecture enables evaluation of multiple HLS concepts with minimal modifications to the control law. Simulation results of the multi tilt-rotor configuration following the final portion of the Apollo 11 descent trajectory are shown.

Jing Pei↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Feasibility Study of a Multi-Tilt-Rotor Aircraft as the Artemis Lunar Training Vehicle

The Lunar Landing Research Vehicles (LLRVs) and the Lunar Landing Training Vehicles (LLTVs) provided astronauts of the Apollo program with essential experience and confidence required to complete the missions, and contributed to six successful manned landings on the moon. The primary challenge in terrestrial training was being able to replicate the ratio of tilt angle to linear acceleration that a pilot would experience in lunar gravity. Presently, as the Artemis program seeks to return humans to the Moon by 2025, engineers are evaluating suitable platforms to serve as an In-Flight Trainer (IFT) or Artemis Lunar Training Vehicle (ALTV) for astronauts training in the task of manual landing. The program is investigating the viability of current technology in the field of electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) vehicles and is evaluating using a multi-tilt-rotor aircraft platform as a candidate for a preliminary ALTV. The tilt-rotor capability enables the vehicle attitude to be decoupled from its flight path, which is a crucial requirement in realistically simulating lunar gravity on Earth. Other key considerations include compensating for a lack of aerodynamic forces while flying through the atmosphere of Earth, as well as the ability to simulate the dynamics of multiple different lander designs for the Human Landing System (HLS) program. This paper details the feasibility study and presents a preliminary flight control architecture for an IFT based on a notional multi-tilt-rotor platform. The model-following control law, based on nonlinear dynamic inversion (NDI), removes the need for gain scheduling. The inner-loop dynamic control allocation strategy consists of a static portion that is optimized offline for trim while compensating for the difference in gravity and a dynamic portion that is computed in real time. The reference model consists of the full closed-loop dynamics of a generic HLS design. The modularity of the flight control architecture enables evaluation of multiple HLS concepts with minimal modifications to the control law. Simulation results of the multi-tilt-rotor configuration following the final portion of the Apollo 11 descent trajectory are shown.

Jing Pei↗

NASA NTRS2023

NASA GRC Solar Cell Characterization Facilities

NASA GRC maintains various equipment to calibrate and characterize photovoltaic devices to Air Mass Zero standards and different space-simulated environments. These characterization capabilities are critical to developing and advancing photovoltaic devices, allowing advancements in various NASA-related projects (Artemis, Lunar Gateway, Human Landing System, etc.). Our facilities include an X-25 Triple source Solar Simulator, G2V Sunbrick, Angstrom Designs pLEDss (Programmable LED Solar Simulator), Thermal Balance facility, ER-2 High Altitude aircraft calibration.

Photovoltaic↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Science Off the Earth: An Integrated Approach to Science Operations in the Artemis Era and Beyond

Humanity is standing on the cusp of its next giant leap – an international, sustainable, and commercial return to the moon. Unlike the Apollo missions, the expectation that a permanent human presence will be established is well founded. Initially, crewed missions to the lunar surface are expected to last between 6 and 30 days and occur approximately once per year, however the robust suite of landers and orbiting assets proposed by both commercial and government entities provide an opportunity to conduct science research on the moon and in cis-lunar space, 24x7 for many years. In the 50 years since the conclusion of Apollo, NASA’s crewed space science missions have been evolving. This can be seen clearly from Skylab and the Space Shuttle’s Spacelab to the International Space Station (ISS). Presently aboard the ISS, international crews spend nearly half their time working on experiments while many payloads collect science non-stop with either very limited, or no crew interaction. Additionally, a fleet of orbiting experiments complement and validate those investigations performed on the ISS. As the number, variety, and complexity of these investigation increase, it becomes ever more necessary to integrate across the many entities involved to prevent duplication of effort, ensure complementary results, reduce cost, and create a sustainable environment to conduct groundbreaking scientific research in space. In this paper, we examine how the various elements of the Artemis program including NASA’s Lunar Gateway, Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) endeavor, the Human Landing Systems (HLS), surface habitats, rovers and many more will be operated to ensure interoperability, maximize science return, and enable success for government, commercial and private partners.

Science Operations↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA GRC Solar Cell Characterization Facilities

NASA GRC maintains various equipment to calibrate and characterize photovoltaic cells at Air Mass Zero (AM0) standards and in simulated space environments. These characterization facilities are critical to developing and advancing solar cell technologies, allowing advancements in a wide variety of NASA projects (Artemis, Lunar Gateway, Human Landing System, etc.).

Photovoltaic↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Moving Beyond Apollo: Vacuum Ground Testing to Reduce Plume-Surface Interaction Risks to Lunar Landers

NASA’s Artemis Program will return humans to the surface of the Moon for the first time since Apollo using the Human Landing System (HLS). Plume-surface interactions (PSI) pose a potential hazard to all propulsive landing vehicles and future nearby assets that will be part of a sustained lunar architecture. Risks due to uncertainty in PSI predictions have challenged lunar landers since the 1960s, and understanding these phenomena further remains critical to enabling NASA’s lunar exploration goals. To this end, the HLS Program has funded a risk reduction ground test to obtain data relevant for application to environments produced by large landing systems. New data are needed to understand PSI and effects with the potential to differ from those experienced by the Apollo landers. This presentation will discuss the test concept, facility, research goals, methods, and planned data products.

Moon↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Overview of Plume-Surface Interaction Testing and Research

NASA has studied rocket plume-surface interactions caused by spacecraft since the Apollo era to reduce risk to landing vehicles. The study of plume-surface interactions is a multi-discipline effort, spanning aerospace engineering to planetary science. Historical testing for Apollo and Viking produced methods, terms, and datasets that influence the field today. Research conducted over the past two decades has expanded our understanding of plume-surface interaction phenomena, but the problem remains resistant to a robust predictive capability. Contemporary experimental and modeling efforts to understand and retire strategic knowledge gaps will be discussed, with a focus on work conducted under NASA’s Plume-Surface Interaction Project and the upcoming Human Landing System Plume-Surface Interaction Risk Reduction Ground Test.

Wesley A Chambers↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Plume-surface interaction testing for crewed lunar lander risk reduction

Spacecraft conducting propulsive near-surface operations such as landing or initial ascent must consider potential hazards caused by rocket exhaust interacting with planetary regolith. Gas-granular interactions can erode the surface and eject material, altering the landing site, obscuring views of the surface, and creating abrasion or impact risks. The next generation of lunar landers under development for NASA’s Human Landing System program will push us outside Apollo flight experience for plume-surface interaction. Strategic knowledge gaps and poorly constrained flight data inhibit our ability to accurately and precisely predict the plume-surface interaction environment for a given flight vehicle. We present an overview of a lunar relevant, supersonic plume-surface interaction test that will be conducted in 2024 to improve our understanding of lunar PSI and reduce associated risks to the HLS program.

Wesley A. Chambers↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transfers from TLI to Lunar Frozen Orbits with Applications to NASA’s CLPS & Artemis Programs

This paper will focus on trajectory transfers from trans-lunar injection (TLI) to lunar frozen orbits with applications to NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) and Artemis Human Landing System (HLS) programs. For a CLPS application, the CS-3 mission is explored, which will deploy a communications relay satellite in lunar elliptical frozen orbit followed by landing a payload on the lunar farside during dawn. Given HLS will land a crew near the lunar south pole with lighting and timing requirements, the effect of varying the Earth-Moon transit duration to influence the approach direction upon landing will be explored.

lunar frozen orbits↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Verification of the Generalized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink (R)

NASA uses six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) simulations tools to design, test, develop Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) software, and certify vehicle performance prior to flight. Therefore, it is critical that the 6-DOF tools used for vehicle design and certification are validated. The focus of this work is the vali-dation of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center 6-DOF “GeneraLized Aero-space Simulation in Simulink” (GLASS) framework tool. The GLASS tool framework is currently used to support NASA GN&C insight for the Human Landing System (HLS) project, simulating vehicle dynamics during lunar descent and as-cent. The GLASS framework utilizes the off-the-shelf Mathworks ® Simscape Multibody® toolbox to model vehicle multi-body dynamics. NASA’s Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) provides a set of 6-DOF simulation verification “check cases” that are available to any user needing to verify 6-DOF tools. The check cases contain seventeen atmospheric and twenty-six orbital test scenarios are provided to validate equations of motion, environmental models (e.g., atmosphere, gravitation, and geodesy) and tool propagators. This paper compares GLASS 6-DOF simulation results against the NESC check cases’ results via simulation-to-simulation comparisons. The comparisons demonstrate that GLASS simulation results are “in family” with the outputs of the applicable NASA NESC check cases and verifies the GLASS core framework dynamics and the correct implementation of the check case scenario models.

6-Dof↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Verification of the Generalized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink

NASA uses six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) simulations tools to design, test, develop Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) software, and certify vehicle performance prior to flight. Therefore, it is critical that the 6-DOF tools used for vehicle design and certification are validated. The focus of this work is the validation of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center 6-DOF “GeneraLized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink” (GLASS) framework tool. The GLASS tool framework is currently used to support NASA GN&C insight for the Human Landing System (HLS) project, simulating vehicle dynamics during lunar descent and ascent. The GLASS framework utilizes the off-the-shelf Mathworks (R) Simscape (TM) Multibody (TM) toolbox to model vehicle multi-body dynamics. NASA’s Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) provides a set of 6-DOF simulation verification “check cases” that are available to any user needing to verify 6-DOF tools. The check cases contain seventeen atmospheric and twenty-six orbital test scenarios are provided to validate equations of motion, environmental models (e.g., atmosphere, gravitation, and geodesy) and tool propagators. This paper compares GLASS 6-DOF simulation results against the NESC check cases’ results via simulation-to-simulation comparisons. The comparison demonstrates that GLASS simulation results are “in family” with the outputs of the applicable NASA NESC check-cases and verify the GLASS core framework dynamics and the implementation of the check case scenario models.

6-Dof↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advancements in Frequency Domain Analysis of Dual Centerline Propellant Tanks for Space Vehicle Stability and Design

This paper presents advancements in the frequency domain stability analysis for landing and ascent vehicle configurations with dual centerline propellant tanks, developed in support of Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) insight activities for the Human Landing System project. The study focuses on the impact of axial thrust on the dual tank slosh danger zone solution. The frequency domain stability analysis tool is developed within the GeneraLized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink® (GLASS) framework at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. The frequency domain stability analysis tool is used to determine slosh damping and control systems design requirements. The accuracy of the tool’s instability predictions is validated against time-domain outcomes within the GLASS simulation environment, showing consistent and anticipated results. Additionally, the method is validated by comparing its results with Frequency Domain Analysis and Comparison Tool Assuming Linearity (FRACTAL), a frequency domain analysis tool with extensive heritage and rigorous verification and validation using NASA Ares I-X and SLS flight data. The findings of this paper contribute to a better understanding of dual-tank slosh instability and support improved design and operation margins of space vehicles.

Han Woong (Brian) Bae↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advancements in Frequency Domain Analysis of Dual Centerline Propellant Tanks for Space Vehicle Stability and Design

Han Woong (Brian) Bae↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Orbit Determination Comparison Study and Demonstration for Rendezvous and Docking in a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit from the Lunar Surface

For the upcoming NASA Artemis III mission and those that follow, both the Human Landing System (HLS) and Orion programs are invested in understanding the impacts of ground tracking performance in supporting rendezvous and docking in a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO). Several critical questions must be answered to ensure mission success and crew safety and an assortment of analysis tools are being incorporated to address them. Two of these tools, LINCOV and MONTE, are currently providing program decision making results through HLS Insight, HLS NASA-collaborations, and Orion/Gateway cross-program analysis. To ensure consistency in the orbit determination performance, a comparison trade-study is performed using a low-lunar orbit to NRHO rendezvous scenario anticipated for the upcoming Artemis missions. An overview of the two analysis tools is provided along with a detailed step-by-step evaluation of the core capabilities and models related to the orbit determination process. This incremental comparison effort reveals both tools produce consistent solutions for the criteria investigated. Given the confidence in the orbit determination process and solutions generated, these results are then applied to demonstrate an integrated, closed-loop system performance where the HLS lander ascends from the lunar surface and successfully inserts into the NRHO relative to the Orion spacecraft in preparation for the final rendezvous and docking phase.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Pilot Study of Medications Exposed to Vacuum

Background Few studies have been conducted regarding the effects of vacuum on medications and their packaging. While relevant on the International Space Station, understanding these effects becomes even more critical as future NASA missions venture farther away from Earth. Vehicles supporting the Artemis missions will have dedicated, vehicle-specific medical kits as well as crew medical accessory kits. Although most of the kits will be stored in a pressurized, climate-controlled volume, there are specific scenarios in which they may become exposed to vacuum. These include the vehicle being brought to vacuum to enable clearance of atmospheric contaminants, and on Human Landing System (HLS), in the airlock (in which kits may be stored) during extravehicular activities. Overview The Exploration Medical Integrated Product Team (XMIPT) in collaboration with the Department of Defense is conducting a pilot study to assess the effects of vacuum on the medications and their packaging to be used in exploration missions. Phase A of this study will focus on manufacturer’s package integrity and Phase B on identifying chemical changes through active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) testing of the medications at 0, 4.5 and 9 months post exposure. Two exposure durations, 1 hour and 8 hours were selected to represent the expected time at vacuum for an Orion contaminated atmosphere vent/repress and the time at vacuum for a lunar surface EVA. The medications for this study were identified based on those currently being considered for future Artemis missions and represent the types of pharmaceuticals and formulations that are likely to comprise an exploration formulary. Discussion The results from this pilot study will aid in decision making related to the development of medical kits, medication packaging and stowage for long duration lunar and Mars missions, and inform the direction of future medication in vacuum studies.

Vacuum↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cryogenic Fluid Management Using CFD - Development and Applications

The Fluid Dynamics Branch has positioned itself to support a wide range of customers in need of Cryogenic Fluid Management (CFM) analysis. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool used for all manner of internal and external propulsion applications has been extended and refined to better model cryogenic propellant storage and tanking operations. Through the CFM Portfolio project, several validation activities were initiated. Validation of propellant tank self-pressurization, autogenous pressurization, slosh-induced ullage collapse, and jet-induced mixing all aid in defining model accuracy. The on-going validation effort has enabled confident application of the tool to in-line design and evaluation of CFM hardware and operations. Recent project support included design of no-vent fill operations using various techniques for the Human Landing System (HLS). Propellant transfer dynamics were predicted to ensure complete propellant delivery. Many more activities in support of HLS and other projects and programs were supported. The branch has engaged the CFM community to share recent findings and capabilities through conferences. To reach the wider community, a consolidation of fundamental findings from work on in-space pulsed settling maneuvers was distilled in an AIAA paper. Development and demonstration of CFM modeling capabilities continues in order to meet the needs of the agency and its industry partners in the endeavor to sustainably reach the Moon and beyond.

Jacob Brodnick↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis Radiation Environment

NASA’s Artemis program is tasked with going back to the Moon sustainably, paving the way for Mars crewed missions. The long-term architecture of living around and on the Moon necessitates a more comprehensive understanding of the radiation environment that is much different than what is seen in low-Earth orbit on the International Space Station. Without the Earth’s protective magnetic field, high-energy charged particles from the Sun and galactic space can affect both avionics and crew if mitigation strategies are not considered. Programs under Artemis such as Gateway, the Human Landing System, the Space Launch System, Orion, and others use the space environments as defined in the Design Specification for Natural Environments for all engineering design partners. In this paper, the space radiation environments applicable to the Artemis program are discussed.

Artemis↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Orbit Determination Comparison Study and Demonstration for Rendezvous and Docking in a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit from the Lunar Surface

For the upcoming NASA Artemis III mission and those that follow, both the Human Landing System (HLS) and Orion programs are invested in understanding the impacts of ground tracking performance in supporting rendezvous and docking in a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO). Several critical questions must be answered to ensure mission success and crew safety and an assortment of analysis tools are being incorporated to address them. Two of these tools, LINCOV and MONTE, are currently providing program decision making results through HLS Insight, HLS NASA-collaborations, and Orion/Gateway cross-program analysis. To ensure consistency in the orbit determination performance, a comparison trade-study is performed using a low-lunar orbit to NRHO rendezvous scenario anticipated for the upcoming Artemis missions. An overview of the two analysis tools is provided along with a detailed step-by-step evaluation of the core capabilities and models related to the orbit determination process. This incremental comparison effort reveals both tools produce consistent solutions for the criteria investigated to within 0.3\% difference in the absolute position state estimate at key decision making epochs with all errors sources activated.

orbit determination↗