Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “shock wave and boundary layer interaction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1991

High-Order Polynomial Expansions (HOPE) for flux-vector splitting

The Van Leer flux splitting is known to produce excessive numerical dissipation for Navier-Stokes calculations. Researchers attempt to remedy this deficiency by introducing a higher order polynomial expansion (HOPE) for the mass flux. In addition to Van Leer's splitting, a term is introduced so that the mass diffusion error vanishes at M = 0. Several splittings for pressure are proposed and examined. The effectiveness of the HOPE scheme is illustrated for 1-D hypersonic conical viscous flow and 2-D supersonic shock-wave boundary layer interactions.

Liou, Meng-Sing↗
NASA NTRS1956

A Factor Affecting Transonic Leading-edge Flow Separation

A change in flow pattern that was observed as the free-stream Mach number was increased in the vicinity of 0.8 was described in NACA Technical Note 1211 by Lindsey, Daley, and Humphreys. The flow on the upper surface behind the leading edge of an airfoil at an angle of attack changed abruptly from detached flow with an extensive region of separation to attached supersonic flow terminated by a shock wave. In the present paper, the consequences of shock-wave - boundary layer interaction are proposed as a factor that may be important in determining the conditions under which the change in flow pattern occurs. Some experimental evidence in support of the importance of this factor is presented.

FLOW, TURBULENT↗
NASA NTRS2009

Wind-US Code Physical Modeling Improvements to Complement Hypersonic Testing and Evaluation

This report gives an overview of physical modeling enhancements to the Wind-US flow solver which were made to improve the capabilities for simulation of hypersonic flows and the reliability of computations to complement hypersonic testing. The improvements include advanced turbulence models, a bypass transition model, a conjugate (or closely coupled to vehicle structure) conduction-convection heat transfer capability, and an upgraded high-speed combustion solver. A Mach 5 shock-wave boundary layer interaction problem is used to investigate the benefits of k- s and k-w based explicit algebraic stress turbulence models relative to linear two-equation models. The bypass transition model is validated using data from experiments for incompressible boundary layers and a Mach 7.9 cone flow. The conjugate heat transfer method is validated for a test case involving reacting H2-O2 rocket exhaust over cooled calorimeter panels. A dual-mode scramjet configuration is investigated using both a simplified 1-step kinetics mechanism and an 8-step mechanism. Additionally, variations in the turbulent Prandtl and Schmidt numbers are considered for this scramjet configuration.

Georgiadis, Nicholas J.↗
NASA NTRS2017

Evaluation of Full Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models in FUN3D

Full seven-equation Reynolds stress turbulence models are promising tools for today’s aerospace technology challenges. This paper examines two such models for computing challenging turbulent flows including shock-wave boundary layer interactions, separation and mixing layers. The Wilcox and the SSG/LRR full second-moment Reynolds stress models have been implemented into the FUN3D (Fully Unstructured Navier-Stokes Three Dimensional) unstructured Navier-Stokes code and were evaluated for four problems: a transonic two-dimensional diffuser, a supersonic axisymmetric compression corner, a compressible planar shear layer, and a subsonic axisymmetric jet. Simulation results are compared with experimental data and results computed using the more commonly used Spalart-Allmaras (SA) one-equation and the Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST-V) two-equation turbulence models.

reynolds averaging↗
NASA NTRS2017

Evaluation of Full Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models in FUN3D

Full seven-equation Reynolds stress turbulence models are a relatively new and promising tool for todays aerospace technology challenges. This paper uses two stress-omega full Reynolds stress models to evaluate challenging flows including shock-wave boundary layer interactions, separation and mixing layers. The Wilcox and the SSG/LRR full second-moment Reynolds stress models have been implemented into the FUN3D (Fully Unstructured Navier-Stokes Three Dimensional) unstructured Navier-Stokes code and are evaluated for four problems: a transonic two-dimensional diffuser, a supersonic axisymmetric compression corner, a compressible planar shear layer, and a subsonic axisymmetric jet. Simulation results are compared with experimental data and results using the more commonly used Spalart-Allmaras (SA) one-equation and the Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST-V) two-equation turbulence models.

reynolds averaging↗
NASA NTRS2017

Evaluation of Full Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models in FUN3D

Full seven-equation Reynolds stress turbulence models are a relatively new and promising tool for todays aerospace technology challenges. This paper uses two stress-omega full Reynolds stress models to evaluate challenging flows including shock-wave boundary layer interactions, separation and mixing layers. The Wilcox and the SSGLRR full second-moment Reynolds stress models are evaluated for four problems: a transonic two-dimensional diffuser, a supersonic axisymmetric compression corner, a compressible planar shear layer, and a subsonic axisymmetric jet. Simulation results are compared with experimental data and results using the more commonly used Spalart-Allmaras (SA) one-equation and the Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) two-equation models.

computational fluid dynamics↗
NASA NTRS2017

Overview of NASA GRC's Efforts In SWBLI

Overview of NASA Efforts (related to SWBLI research) An overview of NASA's restructured ARMD Program and the resulting new projects. Areas of research pertaining to shock wave boundary layer interaction are highlighted. Plans and status for specific tasks are presented.

Projects↗
NASA NTRS1998

Flowfield Measurements in a Slot-Bled Oblique Shock Wave and Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interaction

An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the flowfield inside a bleed slot used to control an oblique shock-wave and turbulent boundary-layer interaction. The slot was oriented normal to the primary flow direction and had a width of 1.0 cm (primary flow direction), a length of 2.54 cm, and spanned 16.5 cm. The approach boundary layer upstream of the interaction was nominally 3.0 cm thick. Two operating conditions were studied: M = 1.98 with a shock generator deflection angle of 6 deg and M= 2.46 with a shock generator deflection angle of 8 deg. Measurements include surface and flowfield static pressure, Pitot pressure, and total mass-flow through the slot. The results show that despite an initially two-dimensional interaction for the zero bleed-flow case, the slot does not remove mass uniformly in the spanwise direction. Inside the slot, the flow is characterized by two separation regions which significantly reduce the effective flow area. The upper separation region acts as an aerodynamic throat resulting in supersonic flow through much of the slot.

Davis, D. O.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Development of separation due to interaction between a shock wave and a turbulent boundary layer perturbed by rarefaction waves

The interaction of a turbulent boundary layer with rarefaction and shock waves in flows past inclined steps was investigated experimentally and theoretically. The experiments were carried out in supersonic wind tunnels with test sections of 0.6 x 0.6 m and 0.2 x 0.2 m, with adiabatic conditions on the surface model. Based on detailed measurements of pressure fields, velocity, and surface friction, combined with results of optical visualization and analysis of limiting flow lines, three characteristic flow regimes are identified. These are (1) nonseparated flow at small step angles, (2) formation of a local separation zone with a free separation point at moderate step angles, and (3) formation of a large-scale separated flow with a fixed separation point at sufficiently large step angles. The quantitative gasdynamic schemes and surface pressure distributions for these flow regimes are shown for Mach 2.85.

Zheltovodov, A. A.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Hypersonic shock-wave turbulent-boundary-layer interaction flows - Experiment and computation

Solutions of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations are presented and compared with experimental surface data for a series of hypersonic shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction flows. The turbulence models used include the standard k-epsilon two-equation eddy viscosity model, a two-layer modification to this model, and a third model with several modifications to account for compressibility effects. Both modified models gave significant improvements for all the test flows.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Computation of three-dimensional shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction flows

Solutions of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, employing a two-equation turbulence model, are presented and compared with measurements from a series of supersonic shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction experiments. The test flows include swept-compression corners and axisymmetric bodies with either skewed or segmented conical flares. The solutions correctly predict all major qualitative features of the flow field. However, for flow fields with large separated zones, significant quantitative differences are observed between the computed and experimental results. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Simple approximations for the asymptotic description of the interaction between a normal shock wave and a turbulent boundary layer at transonic speeds

The asymptotic description of the interaction between a normal shock wave and a turbulent boundary layer is reviewed. The layers necessary in a rational analysis of the interaction are discussed with emphasis on the differences from an interaction with a laminar boundary layer, the uncoupling of solutions for the distribution of pressure and skin friction at the wall, and the role of the Reynolds shear stress in these solutions. The accuracy of asymptotic solutions in flows at Reynolds numbers of technical interest is discussed. Solutions for the distribution of pressure and skin friction at the wall and the shape of the shock are considered for the case where the flow is near separation. For the pressure and skin friction, it is possible to write two simplified partial solutions, one valid at the beginning of the interaction and one valid somewhat downstream of the shock wave. A solution composed of these two parts and a linear interpolation between them appears to give good comparison with experiment; one unknown constant, independent of the parameters of the interaction, must be found from experiment. The simplified relations are presented. Comparison of numerical computations with experimental data indicates a possible value for the constant and shows quite satisfactory results.

Adamson, T. C., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Glancing shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction with boundary layer suction

Tests conducted to ascertain the stagnation pressure and flow angularity profiles of a turbulent boundary layer subjected to boundary layer suction (BLS) as it crosses a glancing sidewall shock wave have determined that the boundary layer does not separate upon crossing the shock wave. Without BLS, the upstream influence of the shock wave-induced wall static pressure rise was extensive, of the order of four bloundary layer thicknesses; for the same case, with suction, the extent of upstream influence was 50 percent lower. In addition, flow angularities at the wall were found to be smaller with suction than without it.

Barnhart, P. J.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Numerical solution for the interaction of shock wave with laminar boundary layer in two-dimensional flow on a flat plate

The finite difference computation method was investigated for solving problems of interaction between a shock wave and a laminar boundary layer, through solution of the complete Navier-Stokes equations. This method provided excellent solutions, was simple to perform and needed a relatively short solution time. A large number of runs for various flow conditions could be carried out from which the interaction characteristics and principal factors that influence interaction could be studied.

Landau, U.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Simulation of ideal-gas flow by nitrogen and other selected gases at cryogenic temperatures

The real gas behavior of nitrogen, the gas normally used in transonic cryogenic tunnels, is reported for the following flow processes: isentropic expansion, normal shocks, boundary layers, and interactions between shock waves and boundary layers. The only difference in predicted pressure ratio between nitrogen and an ideal gas which may limit the minimum operating temperature of transonic cryogenic wind tunnels occur at total pressures approaching 9 atm and total temperatures 10 K below the corresponding saturation temperature. These pressure differences approach 1 percent for both isentropic expansions and normal shocks. Alternative cryogenic test gases were also analyzed. Differences between air and an ideal diatomic gas are similar in magnitude to those for nitrogen and should present no difficulty. However, differences for helium and hydrogen are over an order of magnitude greater than those for nitrogen or air. It is concluded that helium and cryogenic hydrogen would not approximate the compressible flow of an ideal diatomic gas.

Hall, R. M.↗
NASA NTRS1975

On the calculation of supersonic, separating, and reattaching flows

A method is developed for solving the laminar and turbulent compressible boundary-layer equations for separating and reattaching flows. Results of this method are compared with experimental data for two laminar and three turbulent boundary-layer, shock-wave interactions. Several Navier-Stokes solutions were obtained for each of the laminar boundary-layer, shock-wave interactions considered. Comparison of these solutions indicates a first-order sensitivity in C sub f to the computational mesh selected in both the viscous and inviscid portions of the flow.

Murphy, J. D.↗