Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “CMH-17”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2021 CMH-17 Vol 5 Virtual Meeting CMC M&P Brief Overview

This overview (several slides) describes 1) the overall Goals of the CMH-17 Vol 5 CMC M&P (Materials and Processes) Working Group, 2) M&P sections in the existing CMH-17 Vol 5A that have been targeted for updating, 3) challenges to updating that content for the next edition of Vol 5, and 4) M&P plans for updating CMH-17 Vol 5A. M&P Working Group chairs Kiser and Lehman are leading a group of technical experts to address the sections that require the most attention in terms of updating information. A virtual meeting is providing an opportunity to recruit CMC, fiber, and EBC technical experts to address those sections. Goals will be defined for completing the updating of those sections, taking into account the need to have the updated content reviewed by SME (subject matter experts) well in advance of the publishing date.

Environmental Barrier Coating (EBC)↗

Composite Materials Handbook 17 (CMH-17) Volume 5—Ceramic Matrix Composites

The intent of the Composite Materials Handbook‐17 (CMH‐17) Vol 5A—Ceramic Matrix Composites is that it will provide the information and guidance necessary to design, fabricate, and implement ceramic matrix composite components for commercial aircraft engines. The CMH-17 sponsor is the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). This presentation describes the updating of the handbook, and covers the objectives and activities of the Working Groups that are preparing new content and revising existing text. The 5 Working Groups are: 1) Data Review, 2) Testing, 3) Materials & Processes, 4) Design and Analysis, and 5) Engine Applications. Goal: release Vol 5B in 2023.

Environmental barrier coating (EBC), Ceramic Matri↗

Update on CMH-17 Volume 5: Ceramic Matrix Composites

CMC components are projected to enter service in commercial aircraft in 2016. A wide range of issues must be addressed prior to certification of this hardware. The Composite Materials Handbook-17, Volume 5 on ceramic matrix composites is being revised to support FAA certification of CMCs for hot structure and other elevated temperature applications. The handbook supports the development and use of CMCs through publishing and maintaining proven, reliable engineering information and standards that have been thoroughly reviewed. Volume 5 will contain detailed sections describing CMC materials processing, design analysis guidelines, testing procedures, and data analysis and acceptance. A review of the status of and plans for two of these areas, which are being addressed by the M and P Working Group and the Testing Working Group, will be presented along with a timeline for the preparation of CMH-17, Volume 5.

design↗

Update on CMH-17 Volume 5 Ceramic Matrix Composites

A wide range of issues must be addressed during the process of certifying CMC (ceramic matrix composite) components for use in commercial aircraft. The Composite Materials Handbook-17, Volume 5, Revision A on ceramic matrix composites has just been revised to help support FAA certification of CMCs for elevated temperature applications. The handbook supports the development and use of CMCs through publishing and maintaining proven, reliable engineering information and standards that have been thoroughly reviewed. Volume 5 contains detailed sections describing CMC materialsprocessing design, analysisguidelines, testing procedures, and data analysis and acceptance. A review of the content of this latest revision will be presented along with a description of how CMH-17, Volume 5 could be used by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) and others in the future.

characterization↗

CMH-17 Volume 5 Ceramic Matrix Composites

A wide range of issues must be addressed during the process of certifying CMC (ceramic matrix composite) components for use in commercial aircraft. The Composite Materials Handbook-17, Volume 5, Revision A on ceramic matrix composites has just been revised to help support FAA certification of CMCs for elevated temperature applications. The handbook supports the development and use of CMCs through publishing and maintaining proven, reliable engineering information and standards that have been thoroughly reviewed. Volume 5 contains detailed sections describing CMC materials processing, design analysis guidelines, testing procedures, and data analysis and acceptance. A review of the content of this latest revision will be presented along with a description of how CMH-17, Volume 5 could be used by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) and others in the future.

characterization↗

Composite Materials Handbook 17 (CMH-17) Volume 5—Ceramic Matrix Composites

The Composite Materials Handbook‐17 (CMH‐17) Volume 5 for Ceramic Matrix Composites (formerly MIL-HANDBOOK-17) provides the information and guidance necessary to design, fabricate, and implement ceramic matrix composite (CMC) components in aviation applications. This presentation provides an overview of the handbook content, and covers the objectives and activities of the Working Groups that are preparing new content and revising existing text for the next revision. The five Working Groups are: 1) Data Review, 2) Testing, 3) Materials & Processes, 4) Design & Analysis, and 5) Engine Applications. The goal is to release Revision B in 2023. While the handbook is focused on the application of SiC/SiC and Ox/Ox CMCs and EBCs (environmental barrier coatings), the methodologies (testing, data analysis, characterization, etc.) are also applicable to other CMC systems, and the intent is to start incorporating information for Carbon/Carbon (C/C) composites.

Environmental barrier coating (EBC)↗

Effect of Loading Rate on the Open Hole Compression Strength of Quasi-Isotropic Carbon/Epoxy Laminates

This study was undertaken to examine how well the 0.05 inch/min loading rate typically used to develop allowables for open hole compression strength of carbon/epoxy laminates represents structures that may experience a much lower loading rate (such as civil engineering structures) or a much higher loading rate (such as a rocket interstage at liftoff). The Composite Materials Handbook-17 (CMH-17) suggests developing strength allowables at the coupon level (lowest level of the “building block” approach) and using a rigorous statistical analysis to arrive at a strength allowable upon which the structure is to be further designed at higher levels of the building block pyramid. But do these coupon level tests truly represent meaningful stresses at which the composite in the final structure can withstand considering the effects of loading rate? Open hole compression (OHC) strength was chosen for this study since most structures are designed to some damage tolerance criteria and OHC strength testing is rather simple to perform. A quasi-isotropic lay-up was chosen since this is a very common lay-up sequence. The results show that for structures that experience a very small loading rate (0.0005 in/min) the allowables developed at the standard 0.05 in/min loading rate are higher than what the composite can withstand at this lower loading rate. Conversely, at a high loading rate of 10 in/min the strength values found at the standard test rate of 0.05 in/min are slightly lower and not “in family” using the statistics suggested in CMH-17. These results question if standardized test rates are reliable, at least to the fidelity of being “in family” per CMH-17. Some creep rupture tests were also performed to demonstrate that OHC strength values could be lower than the slowest test speed used in this study (0.0005 in/min).

open hole compression strength↗

Simulation of Dynamic Crushing Behavior of Simulated Carbon/Epoxy Stanchions Using MAT58 and MAT213 in LS-DYNA

Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites have shown promise as a material for structures designed to absorb energy in crush-style impact loading. In complementing the lightweight and tailorable characteristics of CFRP structures, the benefits of impact energy absorption are particularly interesting in aerospace vehicles that require excellent crashworthiness performance. However, simulating the behavior of CFRP structures in dynamic, crushing-style impact loading is challenging because of the many damage and failure modes that are essential to capture in the model. For the present investigation, CFRP stanchions were tested using a crash sled experimental test rig. The stanchions were designed by the Composite Materials Handbook-17 (CMH-17) Crashworthiness Working Group for the purpose of comparing experimental crash sled tests to corresponding simulations of the tests. The stanchions are C-channel shaped and represent a geometry common in the interior of aerospace vehicle structures. Explicit simulations in LSDYNA were performed using a well-established composite material model (MAT58) and a next-generation material model (MAT213). Fully integrated shell elements were utilized instead of 3D solid elements to limit computation time. In all models, each of the sixteen plies were represented with individual layers of shell elements with tiebreak contact between each adjacent ply pair to simulate interlaminar fracture. Simulating the crushing of the stanchions occurred in two phases. First, the material models were calibrated using flat specimens that were manufactured with the same layup as the stanchions. While the original goal was calibration of material-related properties, meshdependent behavior was observed in simulations with either material model, and an unstructured mesh was selected to remediate undesirable mesh-dependent failure modes. Additionally, for both the MAT58 and MAT213 models, it was found that either the crush force or the failure mode could be modeled accurately, but no set of parameters could be identified to attain both results in the same model. Once satisfactory calibration was achieved, the same material parameters were applied to the stanchion crush simulations. The stanchion simulations showed that MAT213 more accurately predicted the experimentally determined crush force, and both material models predicted key aspects of the experimentally observed failure modes.

Composite Materials↗

Verification and Validation of Progressive Damage and Failure Analysis Methods for Intralaminar Failure Modes in Thermoplastic Composites

Current progressive damage and failure analysis (PDFA) methods were developed around thermoset material systems and their physical behavior. However, the applicability of these analysis methods has not been evaluated for use in modeling thermoplastic material systems. As part of the Hi-Rate Composite Aircraft Manufacturing (HiCAM) Project sponsored by NASA, intralaminar failure characterization was completed on a thermoplastic material system, AS4D/PEKK-FC, with off-axis tension (OAT) and off-axis compression (OAC) testing. The experiments were able to capture matrix non-linear shear behavior and the failure envelope of the material system. Two PDFA methods, LS-DYNA MAT299 and NASA’s CompDam-DGD, were then employed to simulate individual coupon behavior and simulation results were compared to published verification and validation guidelines from the CMH-17 crashworthiness working group. The results found that the two modeling methods provided suitable representation of material behavior of thermoplastics.

PDFA↗

Verification and Validation of Progressive Damage and Failure Analysis Methods for Intralaminar Failure Modes in Thermoplastic Composites

Current progressive damage and failure analysis (PDFA) methods were developed around thermoset material systems and their physical behavior. However, the applicability of these analysis methods has not been evaluated for use in modeling thermoplastic material systems. As part of the Hi-Rate Composite Aircraft Manufacturing (HiCAM) Project sponsored by NASA, intralaminar failure characterization was completed on a thermoplastic material system, AS4D/PEKK-FC, with off-axis tension (OAT) and off-axis compression (OAC) testing. The experiments were able to capture matrix non-linear shear behavior and the failure envelope of the material system. Two PDFA methods, LS-DYNA MAT299 and NASA’s CompDam-DGD, were then employed to simulate individual coupon behavior and simulation results were compared to published verification and validation guidelines from the CMH-17 crashworthiness working group. The results found that the two modeling methods provided suitable representation of material behavior of thermoplastics.

PDFA↗