Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Techno-Economic Analysis of an Intensified Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plant Featuring a Combined Membrane Reactor - Adsorptive Reactor (MR-AR) System

In this work, the novel concept of a combined membrane-adsorptive reactor sequence (MRAR) is developed and implemented in an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant. This novel MR-AR IGCC plant is subsequently analyzed from an economic viewpoint through a techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the proposed plant. This novel design can achieve over 90% carbon capture without the use of a Dual-Stage Selexol unit. The resultant intensified design is more efficient from both an economic and power production perspective than the traditional IGCC plants with pre-combustion Carbon-Capture Storage (CCS) technology. The COMSOL software package is utilized to simulate the MR-AR sequence proposed in this work, and the UNISIM software (HoneywellTM) is used to create an intensified process flowsheet of the proposed MR-AR IGCC plant, which is subsequently heat-integrated. The TEA developed for the MR-AR IGCC power plant will be used to identify the extent of process intensification the proposed design has over the traditional IGCC plants with pre-combustion CCS. Furthermore, the results demonstrate a reduction in both the cost-of-electricity (COE) and in the capital cost of the proposed design over the baseline case.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Facilitated transport membranes for H 2 purification from coal-derived syngas: A techno-economic analysis

A single-stage membrane process has been designed for using facilitated transport membranes (FTMs) to decarbonize the coal-derived syngas from an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant. The necessary process model and costing method have also been developed to assess the technical feasibility and process economics. In order to account for the carrier saturation phenomenon associated with FTMs, a homogeneous reactive diffusion model is integrated into the process model. The techno-economic study reveals that the mitigated carrier saturation upon bulk CO 2 removal can lead to appreciable increases in the CO 2 permeance and CO 2 /H 2 selectivity, which can be utilized to achieve 95% CO 2 purity and 95% H 2 recovery with a CO 2 /H 2 selectivity of 50 at the complete carrier saturation. FTMs with different facilitated transport characteristics can also be arranged in a hybrid membrane configuration to render a H 2 recovery of 99% and a cost of electricity of $\$118.5$ /MWh, which is 12.5% lower than that of the benchmark Selexol process.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Final Technical Report

In September 2010, RTI and the DOE/NETL signed a cooperative agreement (DE-FE000489) to design, build, and operate a pre-commercial syngas cleaning system that would capture up to 90% of the CO 2 in the syngas slipstream, and demonstrate the ability to reduce syngas contaminants to meet DOE’s specifications for chemical production application. This pre-commercial syngas cleaning system is operated at Tampa Electric Company’s (TEC) 250-MWe integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant at Polk Power Station (PPS), located near Tampa, Florida. The syngas cleaning system consists of the following units: Warm Gas Desulfurization Process (WDP) - this unit processes a syngas flow equivalent of 50 MWe of power (50 MWe equivalent corresponds to about 2.0 MM scfh of syngas on dry basis) to produce a desulfurized syngas with a total sulfur (H 2 S+COS) concentration ~ 10 ppmv. Water Gas Shift (WGS) Reactor - this unit converts sufficient CO into CO 2 to enable 90% capture of the CO 2 in the syngas slipstream. This reactor uses conventional commercial shift catalyst technologies. Low Temperature Gas Cooling (LTGC) - this unit cools the syngas for the low temperature activated MDEA process and separates any condensed water. Activated MDEA Process (aMDEA) - this unit employs a non-selective separation for the CO 2 and H 2 S present in the raw syngas stream. Because of the selective sulfur removal by the upstream WDP unit, the CO 2 capture target of 90% CO 2 can be achieved with the added benefit that total sulfur concentration in the CO 2 product is < 100 ppmv. An additional advantage of the activated MDEA process is that the non-selective sulfur removal from the treated syngas reduces sulfur in the treated gas to very low sub-ppmv concentrations, which are required for chemical production applications. Testing to date of this pre-commercial syngas cleaning system has shown that the technology has great potential to provide clean syngas from coal and petcoke-based gasification at increased efficiency and at significantly lower capital and operating costs than conventional syngas cleanup technologies. However, before the technology can be deemed ready for scale-up to a full commercial-scale demonstration, additional R&D testing is needed at the site to address the following critical technical risks: WDP sorbent stability and performance; Impact of WDP on downstream cleanup and conversion steps; Metallurgy and refractory; Syngas cleanup performance and controllability; Carbon capture performance and additional syngas cleanup The proposed plan to acquire this additional R&D data involves: Operation of the units to achieve an additional 3,000 hours of operation of the system within the performance period, with a target of achieving 1,000 hours of those hours via continuous operation of the entire integrated pre-commercial demonstration system; Rapid turnaround of repairs and/or modifications required as necessary to return any specific unit to operating status with documentation and lessons learned to support technology maturation, and; Proactive performance of maintenance activities during any unplanned outages and if possible while operating.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Advanced Gasification and Novel Transformational Coal Conversion Technologies Development: Final Technical Report

This report summarizes the work carried out in furtherance of the NETL/DOE award, OTM-Enhanced Coal Syngas for Carbon Capture Power Systems and Fuel Synthesis Applications. The overall objective of the project was to further develop Oxygen Transport Membrane (OTM) technology and assess the potential for integration in coal power generation. OTM technology has the potential to enhance the quality of syngas produced by coal gasifiers, reduce the amount of cryogenic-derived oxygen required in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants, and allow for coal and natural gas integration. Process simulations and techno-economic analyses were carried out to estimate the cost and performance of OTM enhanced IGCC plants, IG-NGCC plants, and OTM enhanced Fischer Tropsch (FT) Liquids from coal and natural gas plants. The OTM enhanced power plants achieved higher carbon capture rates, higher efficiencies, and lower cost of electricity compared to the base cases. The most significant benefits were achieved for cases which used low rank coal as the feed. Fischer-Tropsch coal to liquids plants with iron-based catalysts and natural gas integration utilizing OTM technology showed improved carbon conversion, improved thermal efficiency and lower cost of production. With respect to OTM core technology development, significant advances have been made in several areas. The development and implementation of a third-generation membrane materials and manufacturing process has resulted in the availability of robust and reliable, high performance membranes, that can be manufactured at high yield. Progress towards the goal of higher pressure operation has been demonstrated with the development of improved metal-ceramic seals and components of the panel array module that integrate membrane-seal assemblies with primary and secondary reforming catalysts have been further developed and demonstrated. Work concluded with the successful start-up and operation of a multi-panel pilot-scale system which is the final step in technology development ahead of demonstration.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗

BENCH-SCALE DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSFORMATIVE MEMBRANE PROCESS FOR PRE-COMBUSTION CO 2 CAPTURE

This final technical report describes work conducted by Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. (MTR) for the Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE NETL) on development of the second generation (Gen-2) Proteus™ membrane modules and a pre-combustion membrane process for carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) capture from an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant for power generation (award number DE-FE0031632). The work was conducted from October 1, 2018 through March 30, 2022. The overall goal of this project was to bring a Gen-2 version of the H2-selective Proteus membrane to bench-scale module (component) testing with real syngas. MTR was assisted in this project by Susteon, a technology development company with extensive experience in gasification processes, and the University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), who provided the host site for the slipstream field testing. This report details the work conducted to optimize the Gen-2 Proteus membrane and develop modules capable of operation at 200°C; demonstrate membrane module performance processing coal-derived syngas during a field test at EERC; and optimize integration of a dual-membrane process into an IGCC with carbon capture. Work for this project included membrane optimization and scale-up, module component screening and fabrication of high-temperature lab- and bench-scale modules, design and fabrication of a bench-scale field test membrane skid, operation of the field test skid processing coal-derived syngas at EERC, and a detailed techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the MTR dual-membrane process for IGCC power plant pre-combustion CO 2 capture. This project validated recent membrane technology advancements, mitigates risk in future scale-up activities, and moved the membrane pre-combustion capture technology from TRL-4 to TRL-5. Key results for each major task are discussed in the report.

10 SYNTHETIC FUELS↗

Integrated Water-Gas-Shift Pre-combustion Carbon Capture Process

TDA Research, Inc (TDA) has developed a highly efficient integrated WGS pre-combustion carbon capture technology and demonstrated its techno-economic viability for use in the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants that process coal. The new system uses a warm gas CO 2 scrubber integrated with a Water-Gas-Shift (WGS) catalyst to capture greater than 90% of the carbon emissions, which does not increase the cost of electricity (COE) as much as conventional carbon capture technologies.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

A biologically-inspired approach for adaptive control of advanced energy systems

Here in this article, a novel approach is proposed for integrating a Biologically-Inspired Optimal Control Strategy (BIOsingle bondCS) with an Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based adaptive component for advanced energy systems applications. Specifically, BIOsingle bondCS employs gradient-based optimal control solvers in a biologically-inspired manner, following the rule of pursuit for ants, to simultaneously control multiple process outputs at their desired setpoints. Also, the ANN component captures the mismatch between the controller and the plant models by using a single-hidden-layer technique with online learning capabilities to augment the baseline BIOsingle bondCS control laws. The resulting approach is a unique combination of biomimetic control and data-driven methods that provides optimal solutions for dynamic systems. The applicability of the proposed framework is illustrated via an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) process with carbon capture as an advanced energy system example. In particular, a multivariable control structure associated with a subsystem of the IGCC plant simulation in DYNSIM® is addressed. The proposed control laws are derived in MATLAB®, while the plant models are built in DYNSIM®, and a previously developed MATLAB®-DYNSIM® link is employed for implementation purposes. The proposed integrated approach improves the overall performance of the process up to 85% in terms of reducing the output tracking error when compared to stand-alone BIOsingle bondCS and Proportional-Integral (PI) controller implementations, resulting in faster setpoint tracking. The proposed framework thus provides a promising alternative for advanced control of energy systems of the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Chemical Looping Coal Gasification Sub-Pilot Unit Demonstration and Economic Assessment for IGCC applications (Final Report)

The Ohio State University (OSU) coal to syngas (CTS) technology is an advanced air separation process that can be applied for electricity production via an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC). The objective of the proposed project is to enable the OSU CLG technology for a commercially relevant demonstration by 2020. In order to accomplish this objective, small pilot scale demonstration of the CLG reactor system was performed. The small pilot test unit incorporates commercially scalable non-mechanical gas sealing and solids flow control components for extended operations of the integrated reactor system. A cumulative demonstration of greater than 100 hours was performed to confirm the reliability of the reactors (reducer and oxidizer) and non-mechanical devices in maintaining controlled solid circulation, gas sealing, and coal distribution in the reactor (reducer) as well as to confirm sustained syngas product performance. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the OSU CLG process for IGCC application was conducted with the support of WorleyParsons, Ltd. (WP) and compared to the Department of Energy (DOE) baseline IGCC report. Using the data gained from the small pilot demonstration, a complete comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the CLG process was conducted. The evaluation was used as basis to attract utilities and coal industries in Ohio. The project duration lasts 30 months (6 months of no cost extension). Ohio coal was used in the integrated CLG small pilot unit to convert to high hydrogen syngas. A demonstration of the integrated chemical looping reactor system at the 15 kW th scale accelerates technology commercialization in the near term. The 15 kWth demonstration addressed several major technology gaps, such as coal injection and distribution in the reducer, controllable solids circulation with the desired fuel to solids ratio, system pressure distribution for proper gas sealing, effects of contaminants and fuel/oxygen carrier residence time requirements. The fates of impurities, such as SO x and NO x was also investigated in unit demonstrations. WP conducted a comprehensive system TEA to optimize the OSU CLG process design for efficient electricity generation with greater than 90% CO 2 capture in IGCC applications. The conclusion of this project supports the further scale-up of the technology to a commercially applicable large pilot scale test unit for operation by 2020. More importantly, it benefits Ohio as it provides an economically competitive mean for power generation with carbon capture. Given the rise of natural gas usage and strict environmental regulations, the use of Ohio coal is expected to decrease and thus impact the coal economy in Ohio. The conclusion of this project provided way for Ohio coal to compete in the future and secure jobs in the energy sector.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Pilot Scale Operation and Testing of Syngas Chemical Looping For Hydrogen Production

The Syngas Chemical looping (SCL) process provides efficient and economic means to utilize the abundant fossil reserve of coal. The main problem associated with coal utilization is the CO 2 emissions resulting from its combustion. Even though CO 2 regulation or carbon tax is currently not in place, its enforcement is expected in the near future. Such a greenhouse gas emission control, if adopted in current power plant systems, will drive the efficiency down and increase the cost of electricity, due to the energy and capital-intensive nature of current CO 2 separation techniques. This highlights the need to develop technologies that present a solution to the rising cost of electricity in the future. The integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) presents an improvement to the above predicament, but it is capital intensive due to the extensive unit operations involved. The efficiency for a CO 2 capture incorporated IGCC system is around ~32%, resulting in approximately 45% increase in cost of electricity. This is definitely a better path to traverse than the conventional pulverized coal (PC) power plants as it has improved economics and efficiencies accompanied by product flexibility. The SCL process advances the benefits even further when integrated with the IGCC process. The SCL process removes the expensive WGS system and CO 2 separation columns, thereby saving on capital and operational expenses. This integration results in a 12 – 21% increase in efficiency accompanied by a reduction in cost of electricity by 15 – 28%, over conventional IGCC systems. Therefore, SCL process provides the best route to harness the energy from coal. The overall project objective was to construct and operate a syngas chemical looping pilot scale test unit at the NCCC. The project scope of work was divided into 3 phases. In Phase I, cold flow model studies using a 1:1 scale acrylic test unit constructed at Particulate Solids Research, Inc. (PSRI) was successfully completed confirming robust solid flow control is achievable in the non-mechanical system design. In Phase II, the high pressure, high temperature, chemical looping reactor was successfully designed with all necessary equipment and safety instrumentation/controls specified to allow for fabrication, site construction, and assembly to commence in Phase III. In Phase III, the SCL pilot plant was successfully assembled and all necessary functional checks and pre-startup safety reviews completed. During unit commission over the course of 200 hours of testing, operational issues were observed with premix burner used for system startup. With the grants awarded by the National Energy Laboratory (NETL) and the Ohio Development Services Agency (ODSA) under awards DE-FE0023915 and D-14-18, the SCL pilot unit underwent three auxiliary equipment modifications to resolve all of the startup operational issues encountered. The unit was successfully demonstrated with 300+hr continuous operation. Key results obtained include high syngas conversion of 97.95% with 16.03% oxygen carrier conversion in the moving bed reducer and >99% purity H 2 produced from the moving bed oxidizer.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Development of a Pre-combustion CO 2 Capture Process Using High-Temperature PBI Hollow-Fiber Membranes

The overall goal of this research project was to develop a high-temperature, membrane-based CO 2 capture technology for coal gasification facilities and make progress toward meeting overall fossil energy performance goals of CO 2 capture with 95% CO 2 purity at a cost of electricity (COE) 30% less than baseline capture approaches. The primary objectives of the project were to evaluate, at a bench-scale size, a technically and economically viable CO 2 capture system based on a high-temperature polybenzimidazole (PBI) polymer hollow-fiber membrane (HFM) separation system, and to optimize the process for integration of that system into an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant. The specific objectives of the proposed project are to: (1) fabricate high-performance PBI-HFMs for H 2 /CO 2 separation; (2) collect laboratory data for separating hydrogen from simulated synthesis gas using PBI-based membrane modules; (3) transfer the membrane fabrication technology to an industrial firm that specializes in the manufacture of HFMs; (4) fabricate membrane modules to process a syngas stream (50 kWth) equivalent to that of shifted gas from an oxygen-blown gasifier; (5) obtain design and steadystate performance data for membrane modules using syngas from an operating coal gasifier; (6) estimate the cost of CO 2 capture from pre-combustion gas streams integrated into a 550-MW (net) power plant; and (7) conduct a process environmental health & safety (EH&S) assessment.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Zeolite Membrane Reactor for Pre-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture (Final Scientific/Technical Report)

Water-gas shift (WGS) reaction followed by carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) separation is a critical step in the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) process for fossil-fuel-fired electrical power generation with CO 2 capture. To intensify the IGCC process hydrogen-permselective zeolite membrane reactor offers promise to replace the conventional energy-intensive fixed-bed reactors and solvent-based CO 2 capture units. The objectives of this project were to develop a bench-scale zeolite membrane reactor (total membrane area: 932 cm 2 for a 21-tube membrane bundle) for the water-gas-shift reaction of raw syngas from an oxygen-blown coal-gasifier for H 2 production with simultaneous CO 2 separation at the capability of about 2 kilograms H 2 per day (equivalent to 2 kW IGCC power plant) and to demonstrate significant progress toward achieving overall performance goal of 90% CO 2 capture rate with 95% CO 2 purity at the cost of electricity 30% less than the baseline carbon capture approaches. This report summarizes results obtained in this project on scaling up the zeolite membrane reactor by a factor of 200 in membrane area, tests of the bench-scale zeolite membrane reactor for the water-gas-shift reaction at high temperature and high-pressure, and techno-economic analysis of the integration of the zeolite membrane reactor in IGCC power plant for the electrical generation with CO 2 capture. With effective pore modification by catalytic cracking deposition of MDES (methyldiethoxysilane), fabrication of MFI-type zeolite membranes was successfully scaled-up from a lab-scale disk type to bench-scale multiple-tube bundles on low-cost alumina supports. A Co-Mo based sour shift catalyst was evaluated and used in the zeolite membrane reactors for water-gas-shift reaction. The reaction kinetic and gas-permeation equations were developed and employed in mathematic models to guide/predict experiments/performance of zeolite membrane reactors for water-gas shift reaction. Multiple-tube zeolite membrane bundles and reactors were designed, fabricated and tested for gas separation and water-gas-shift reactions with real raw syngas from a coal-fired gasifier operated at high temperature and pressure. The zeolite membrane reactors demonstrated good long-term thermal and chemical stability and constant H 2 permeance (>300 GPU) together with a Knudsen selectivity (~4.7) for H 2 over CO 2 in the field test (cumulative time >28 hours) with high-sulfur coal-derived syngas. The zeolite-membrane-reactor integrated IGCC process was designed using the performance experimentally measured by the University of Cincinnati team with a single-tube zeolite membrane reactor that offers a CO conversion >98% with more than 90% of CO 2 and H 2 captured. With the above integrative approaches, a techno-economic analysis for a cost-benefit comparison was performed to uncover features that determine the power output, capital expenditure, operating expenditure, cost of electricity and cost of CO 2 capture in a 550-MW zeolite-membrane-reactor integrated IGCC process. The integration of the zeolite membrane reactor in IGCC could provide a significant reduction of 80% and 27% in the power consumption for Selexol™ Acid Gas Removal and CO 2 compression, respectively, which lowers the total auxiliary power consumption by 12.5%. However, the low pressure required at permeate stream for maintaining the driving force of hydrogen permeation through the zeolite membrane costs a huge power in permeate compressor, compensating the power consumption reduction achieved with the membrane reactor. Thus, for coal-fired IGCC for electricity generation with 90% CO 2 captured, the integration of the membrane reactor could provide a CO conversion ~99% and a significant drop in cost-of-electricity using zeolite membrane with H 2 permeance >600 GPU and the H 2 /CO 2 selectivity over 70.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Zeolite Membrane Reactor for Pre-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture

Water-gas shift (WGS) reaction followed by carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) separation is a critical step in the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) process for fossil-fuel-fired electrical power generation with CO 2 capture. To intensify the IGCC process hydrogen-permselective zeolite membrane reactor offers promise to replace the conventional energy-intensive fixed-bed reactors and solvent-based CO 2 capture units. The objectives of this project were to develop a bench-scale zeolite membrane reactor (total membrane area: 932 cm 2 for a 21-tube membrane bundle) for the water-gas-shift reaction of raw syngas from an oxygen-blown coal-gasifier for H 2 production with simultaneous CO 2 separation at the capability of about 2 kilograms H 2 per day (equivalent to 2 kW IGCC power plant) and to demonstrate significant progress toward achieving overall performance goal of 90% CO 2 capture rate with 95% CO 2 purity at the cost of electricity 30% less than the baseline carbon capture approaches. This report summarizes results obtained in this project on scaling up the zeolite membrane reactor by a factor of 200 in membrane area, tests of the bench-scale zeolite membrane reactor for the water-gas-shift reaction at high temperature and high-pressure, and techno-economic analysis of the integration of the zeolite membrane reactor in IGCC power plant for the electrical generation with CO 2 capture.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗

Stakeholder Analysis Report Subtask 3.3 – CarbonSAFE Illinois East Sub-Basin Topical Report 8

Effective stakeholder engagement has been proven to be a critical component in the success of numerous CCS activities and is essential if the technology is to be widely developed in the future. This report contains a stakeholder assessment and highlights some engagement activities conducted during the CarbonSAFE Illinois East Sub-Basin Prefeasibility study. This report is intended to lay the groundwork and provide recommendations for the Wabash CarbonSAFE Feasibility project, currently underway in conjunction with the Wabash Valley Resources ammonia plant retrofit taking place at the former Terre Haute US DOE integrated gasification combined cycle plant. The analysis sets the stage for identifying and understanding the concerns of key stakeholders, describes actions currently underway, highlights perceptions of potential benefits and risks of project activities, and provides recommendations for short- and long-term forms of engagement. This study used social site characterization methods to better understand local and regional stakeholder positions and needs. The stakeholder engagement strategy will emphasize engagement with stakeholders that enable project development and those that are impacted by the project. The stakeholder analysis process can be broken down into the four basic steps of: identifying, analyzing, mapping, and prioritizing. Various stakeholders were identified by literature search, and additionally by a group of approximately twenty Indiana University SPEA master’s students via a stakeholder workshop. The stakeholder analysis and mapping process is used to help prioritize stakeholder engagement strategies; engagement strategies must be developed with particular stakeholder concerns in mind and messages tailored to those stakeholders’ needs. The stakeholder map with engagement strategy developed for this analysis suggests state government, industry, federal government, and state education are predicted to have the highest interest and influence and should be a priority focus in engagement. Local media, local landowners, local government, and utilities are predicted to have high influence but low interest and may also be a high priority group to engage. Environmental and economic impacts of activities that are considered to be important by stakeholders in the present day (key) or activities that have taken place in the past (legacy) can impact stakeholder perspectives and need to be considered when creating a stakeholder engagement strategy. The issue of environmental clean-up was identified in both the social media analysis and also through USEPA Environmental Justice analysis tools. Thus, it is clear this will be an important factor for consideration in any stakeholder engagement conducted in and around Terre Haute. Furthermore, stakeholder engagement education materials will need to emphasize that carbon dioxide is not a hazardous material, as well as address FAQs regarding CCS. In addition, recommendations for consideration when developing the stakeholder engagement strategy for projects in the Illinois East Sub-Basin in general and related to the Wabash CarbonSAFE project specifically include: drawing clear lines of responsibility between Wabash Valley Resources and ISGS-led Wabash CarbonSAFE that allow the projects to manage integration and messaging; the need for ISGS and other partners to maintain objectivity and remain trusted sources of information; monitoring of social media and continuing to engage with key stakeholder groups; and providing support for key stakeholders to become sources of project information and project champions.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Pilot Testing of a Highly Efficient Pre-combustion Sorbent-based Carbon Capture System

TDA developed and demonstrated a highly efficient pre-combustion carbon capture system. The overall objective of this work was to develop a new sorbent-based pre-combustion carbon capture technology for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants. In this project our goal was to demonstrate the techno-economic viability of the new technology by 1) demonstrating it in large-scale slipstream tests, and 2) carrying out a high fidelity engineering and cost analysis. TDA’s process used an advanced physical adsorbent that selectively removes CO 2 from coal-derived synthesis gas above the dew point of the gas at temperatures as high as 300°C. The sorbent consists of a mesoporous carbon whose surface was grafted with functional groups that remove CO 2 via a well-known acid-base interaction. As documented in bench-scale experiments and field tests with actual coal gas, the sorbent achieved a very high capacity for CO 2 at temperatures as high as 300°C. The sorbent bound CO 2 more strongly than common physical adsorbents, providing the chemical potential needed for the high temperature operation. However, because CO 2 does not form a true covalent bond with the surface sites (as is the case with chemical absorbents), the sorbent regeneration could be carried out with only a very small energy input. The heat input to regenerate our sorbent was only 4.9 kcal per mol of CO 2 , which is much lower than that for chemical absorbents (e.g., 29.9 kcal/mol CO 2 for sodium carbonate) and was similar to the requirements of physical solvents (e.g., 4 kcal/mol CO 2 for Selexol TM ). Because the sorbent operates above the dew point of the synthesis gas (unlike the Selexol TM process), a higher power cycle efficiency can be achieved. With previous DOE/NETL funding (Contract No. DE-FE-0000469), we demonstrated the techno-economic viability of the technology in bench-scale tests and slipstream demonstrations at the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC), Wilsonville, Alabama and Wabash River IGCC plant in Terra Haute, Indiana. We demonstrated a stable working CO 2 capacity for over 11,650 cycles with simulated synthesis gas. We also evaluated its performance with actual synthesis gas in two test campaigns at the Wabash River IGCC Plant, Terre Haute, IN and the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC), Wilsonville, AL. The slipstream tests clearly showed that the actual coal gas constituents and potential contaminants (e.g. trace metals, halides, tars) had no effect on the sorbent’s ability to remove CO 2 (the same sorbent beds were used in both field tests with no sign of deactivation for 2,000 cycles with over 26,750 SCF of gas treated). As expected, due to the high temperature CO 2 removal capability and low energy needed to regenerate the sorbent, the power cycle efficiency with our process was greater than 34% on a higher heating value (HHV) basis; in comparison, the same IGCC plant equipped with the Selexol TM solvent for carbon capture can only achieve 31.4% HHV efficiency. The capital cost for an IGCC system with TDA’s process is estimated as $2,417/kW e , which is 12% lower than that of the IGCC/ Selexol TM process. The levelized cost for electricity including the transport, storage and monitoring (TS&M) cost for CO 2 was calculated as $\$ $92.9/MWh (lowest reported to our knowledge), which is much better than the $105.2/MWh estimated for the IGCC/ Selexol TM process. In this project (DE-FE0013105), TDA Research, in collaboration with our partners Gas Technology Institute (GTI), Illinois Clean Coal Institute (ICCI), University of California, Irvine (UCI), University of Alberta (UOA), Siemens, NCCC and Sinopec advanced the technical maturity of the technology; scaling it up by a factor of 100. We optimized the reactor design using computational fluid dynamics (CFD); using adsorption modeling we improved the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) cycle sequence. We carried out two field test campaigns with a fully-equipped 0.1 MW e prototype unit (for a total of 844 hours) using actual synthesis gas to prove the viability of the new technology. A successful 30 day (707 hrs) evaluation was completed at NCCC under air blown gasification conditions. We demonstrated 97.3% carbon capture at 1,500 SLPM, 93% carbon capture at 1,800 SLPM, and 90% carbon capture at 2,100 SLPM in the NCCC tests. We also demonstrated the system for 137 hours at a Sinopec petrochemical plant under oxygen blown gasification, demonstrating 86% carbon capture at 2,660 SLPM. In collaboration with University of California, Irvine (UCI), we completed a techno-economic analysis (TEA) for TDA’s warm gas cleanup technology integrated to IGCC power plant. The net plant efficiencies (on a coal HHV basis) for the warm gas cleanup cases were estimated to be 34.0% for E-GasTM gasifier, 34.4% for GE gasifier, 33.4 for the Shell gasifier and 34.2 for the TRIG TM gasifier (Cases 2, 4, 6 and 8 in this study) with a catalytic combustor for CO 2 purification, which are significantly higher than those for the Cold Gas Case, or an increase of as much as 12% in the heat rate for Case 2, 6% for Case 4, 9% for Case 6, and 9% for Case 8. The 1st year cost of electricity with the transport, storage and monitoring (TS&M) costs for the CO 2 included was $\$ $129.2/MWh for the E-GasTM gasifier Warm Gas Cleanup Case, $\$ $131.9/MWh for the GE gasifier Warm Gas Cleanup Case, $\$ $146.8/MWh for the Shell Gasifier Warm Gas Cleanup Case, and $\$ $129.9/MWh for the TRIG TM gasifier Warm Gas Cleanup Case. For comparison, the costs for the baseline Cold Gas CO 2 removal with Selexol for the different gasifiers were: $\$ $146.6/MWh for the E-Gas TM gasifier, $\$ $142.2/MWh for the GE gasifier, $\$ $159.0/MWh for the Shell gasifier and $\$ $144.3/MWh for the TRIG TM gasifier. In summary, the costs for our system were 7 to 12% lower than the corresponding Cold Gas Cleanup cases. The results of this techno-economic analysis suggested that TDA’s high temperature PSA-based Warm Gas Clean-up Technology can make a substantial improvement in the IGCC plant thermal performance for achieving near zero CO 2 emissions for E-Gas TM , GE, Shell and TRIG TM gasifier based IGCC power plants. The capital expenses were estimated to be lower than that of Selexol’s™. Taken together, the higher net plant efficiency and lower capital and operating costs resulted in substantial reduction in the cost of carbon capture for the IGCC plant equipped with TDA’s high temperature PSA-based carbon capture system. Finally, in collaboration with Gas Technology Institute (GTI) we completed the environmental health and safety assessment for TDA’s warm gas carbon capture technology.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Analyses of hot/warm CO2 removal processes for IGCC power plants

Abstract Compared with a pulverized coal power plant, the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) has several advantages, including, among others better environmental performance and low CO 2 capture cost. Hot/warm CO 2 removal from syngas has also been a subject of research due to its potentially higher thermal efficiency. In this study, we proposed a generic adsorption based hot/warm CO 2 removal process for IGCC power plants. Through analyses of the proposed generic process we have demonstrated that higher temperature of the hot/warm CO 2 removal process will results in larger heat of adsorption, which in turns may increase energy consumption of the process. Under most of the operating temperature range, hot/warm CO 2 removal process will lead to more electricity loss compared to the baseline Selexol process. However, if the adsorption step takes place at a temperature close to or higher than the highest steam temperature in steam cycle, our analysis indicates that the process may lead to minimal electricity loss. The study also provided some other insights into the pathways for hot/warm CO 2 removal process to improve its energy performance through process and sorbent designs. Graphical Abstract

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Water-gas shift reaction in ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membrane reactor at high temperatures and pressures

Water-gas-shift (WGS) reaction is a critical step in integrated gasification combined cycles (IGCC) power plants with CO 2 capture. Membrane reactors made with a CO 2 -permselective ceramic-carbonate dual-phase (CCDP) membrane offers the potential to enhance hydrogen yield with simultaneous CO 2 capture for WGS reaction. The present work studies operation of WGS reaction in a tubular membrane reactor made of samarium-doped ceria infiltrated with lithium/sodium molten carbonate mixture. The WGS reaction was performed in the membrane reactor with and without a high-temperature WGS catalyst at 800–850 °C, feed pressure of 7 bar, the space velocity of 150–3000 h –1 , and a feed gas mixture of 45.7/13.1/41.3 mol% CO/CO 2 /N 2 with steam to carbon ratio of 4. The results show that the catalyst-free membrane reactor can convert 92% of carbon monoxide into CO 2 and H 2 and recover 29% CO 2 at 850 °C and a space velocity of 150 h –1 . However, in the catalyst-free membrane reactor, a significant amount of unwanted carbon deposition is observed. The side reactions can be minimized by reducing the operating pressure and increasing the operating temperature and space velocity, and completely avoided using a high-temperature catalyst at space velocity>500 h –1 . The membrane reactor with a WGS catalyst achieves CO conversion of about 85%, above the equilibrium conversion, and 40% CO 2 recovery without carbon deposition at high temperature and pressure. Finally, the membrane remains in the same structure and gas-tightness after the WGS reaction tests.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗