Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Modular Power”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1978

The modular power subsystem for the multimission modular spacecraft

The block diagram, subsystems, and components of the modular power subsystem for the multimission modular spacecraft (MMS) are described. The basic design studies were guided by considerations of cost, efficiency, simplicity, and flexibility to serve a variety of missions. Components discussed are the power regulator unit, the power control unit, the signal conditioning assembly, bus protection assembly, and the 20 Ah and 50 Ah batteries. The plan for the modular power subsystem protoflight module tests is shown. The testing has four phases: (1) component level tests, (2) subsystem integration and initial performance test, (3) subsystem protoflight environmental tests, and (4) subsystem final performance tests, qualification/acceptance review and delivery.

Harris, D. W.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advanced Modular Power Systems (AMPS) Project 101

This presentation provides an overview of the Advanced Modular Power Systems (AMPS) Project, along with sections to describe the three technical focus areas - Modular Power Electronics & Standards, Autonomous Power Control, and the Modular Power Testbed.

Modular Power↗
NASA NTRS2013

Advanced Modular Power Approach to Affordable, Supportable Space Systems

Recent studies of missions to the Moon, Mars and Near Earth Asteroids (NEA) indicate that these missions often involve several distinct separately launched vehicles that must ultimately be integrated together in-flight and operate as one unit. Therefore, it is important to see these vehicles as elements of a larger segmented spacecraft rather than separate spacecraft flying in formation. The evolution of large multi-vehicle exploration architecture creates the need (and opportunity) to establish a global power architecture that is common across all vehicles. The Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Modular Power System (AMPS) project managed by NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) is aimed at establishing the modular power system architecture that will enable power systems to be built from a common set of modular building blocks. The project is developing, demonstrating and evaluating key modular power technologies that are expected to minimize non-recurring development costs, reduce recurring integration costs, as well as, mission operational and support costs. Further, modular power is expected to enhance mission flexibility, vehicle reliability, scalability and overall mission supportability. The AMPS project not only supports multi-vehicle architectures but should enable multi-mission capability as well. The AMPS technology development involves near term demonstrations involving developmental prototype vehicles and field demonstrations. These operational demonstrations not only serve as a means of evaluating modular technology but also provide feedback to developers that assure that they progress toward truly flexible and operationally supportable modular power architecture.

Oeftering, Richard C.↗
NASA NTRS2014

Analysis of Advanced Modular Power Systems (AMPS) for Deep Space Exploration

The Advanced Modular Power Systems (AMPS) project is developing a modular approach to spacecraft power systems for exploration beyond Earth orbit. AMPS is intended to meet the need of reducing the cost of design development, test and integration and also reducing the operational logistics cost of supporting exploration missions. AMPS seeks to establish modular power building blocks with standardized electrical, mechanical, thermal and data interfaces that can be applied across multiple exploration vehicles. The presentation discusses the results of a cost analysis that compares the cost of the modular approach against a traditional non-modular approach.

Exploration↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Thermal Analysis of the Advanced Modular Power Systems (AMPS) Power Electronic Modules

In an effort to transform future space power system architectures and operations, the Advanced Modular Power Systems (AMPS) project is currently developing an interface standard for power electronic modules to enable modular architectures for space power systems. Each architecture would consist of one or more modular electronic units (MEU) that would comprise of a tailored combination of modules. The standard currently comprises modules enabling switchgear, power conversion, and data interfacing. The objective of the AMPS project is to enable the modularity and interchangeability of different architectures using these standardized modules in hopes of reducing complexity and cost, increasing inherent redundancy and reliability, and minimizing power system redesign for future programs. A key enabler to these future modular architectures will be the thermal management system, which has to contend with acquiring heat from the electronics modules at the card level and then transporting that heat to the radiator of the larger system. The focus of this paper, therefore, will be the thermal design and analysis of multiple AMPS power electronics modules and the development of their thermal-vacuum test.

Modular Power Electronics↗
NASA NTRS2015

Standardized Modular Power Interfaces for Future Space Explorations Missions

Earlier studies show that future human explorations missions are composed of multi-vehicle assemblies with interconnected electric power systems. Some vehicles are often intended to serve as flexible multi-purpose or multi-mission platforms. This drives the need for power architectures that can be reconfigured to support this level of flexibility. Power system developmental costs can be reduced, program wide, by utilizing a common set of modular building blocks. Further, there are mission operational and logistics cost benefits of using a common set of modular spares. These benefits are the goals of the Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Modular Power System (AMPS) project. A common set of modular blocks requires a substantial level of standardization in terms of the Electrical, Data System, and Mechanical interfaces. The AMPS project is developing a set of proposed interface standards that will provide useful guidance for modular hardware developers but not needlessly constrain technology options, or limit future growth in capability. In 2015 the AMPS project focused on standardizing the interfaces between the elements of spacecraft power distribution and energy storage. The development of the modular power standard starts with establishing mission assumptions and ground rules to define design application space. The standards are defined in terms of AMPS objectives including Commonality, Reliability-Availability, Flexibility-Configurability and Supportability-Reusability. The proposed standards are aimed at assembly and sub-assembly level building blocks. AMPS plans to adopt existing standards for spacecraft command and data, software, network interfaces, and electrical power interfaces where applicable. Other standards including structural encapsulation, heat transfer, and fluid transfer, are governed by launch and spacecraft environments and bound by practical limitations of weight and volume. Developing these mechanical interface standards is more difficult but an essential part of defining physical building blocks of modular power. This presentation describes the AMPS projects progress towards standardized modular power interfaces.

Spacecraft Power↗
NASA NTRS2019

Advanced Modular Power System Electronics Enclosure Thermal Testing

An analysis was set up to model the temperature of the advanced modular power system (AMPS) power distribution cards when installed within the electronics enclosure case. The analysis was used to determine the steady-state temperature distribution of the cards within the case. To verify the analysis, an experiment was set up and conducted to simulate the operation of the cards within the enclosure. Four tests were conducted. The tests varied the position of the cold plate and evaluated the use of a thermal compound to reduce the contact resistance between the joints within the thermal path between the cards and the cold plate. Three of the four cases examined showed very good agreement between the analysis and the experiment with a less than 1-percent variation in the predicated temperatures determined through the analysis and the experimentally derived temperatures. In the remaining case, the difference between the analysis and experiment was approximately 12 percent. Both the experiment and analysis showed that the modular power conditioning cards can be maintained within their desired maximum operating temperature range of 40 to 45 °C through thermal conduction to a cold plate when operating with their estimated maximum heat output of 16 W per card.

Colozza, Anthony J.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Advanced modular power supplies for Space Station Freedom

Viewgraphs and discussion on advanced modular power supplies for Space Station Freedom are presented. Topics covered include concept and characteristics; user power supply applications; and bulk converter application.

Krauthamer, S.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Nickel-cadmium batteries for the Modular Power Subsystem

Nickel-cadmium batteries of 20 and 50 ampere-hour (AH) capacity have been developed and qualified. These batteries provide an energy storage capability of 40 to 150 AH for the Modular Power Subsystem, which is the power source for NASA's Multimission Modular Spacecraft. Battery fabrication is rigidly controlled to assure uniform performance from battery to battery. A unique feature of the battery design is that cells from various manufacturers can be used for battery assembly without modification. Both 20 and 50-AH batteries have been delivered, and an MPS module with three 20-AH batteries is currently operating satisfactorily in low earth orbit. Design characteristics and performance of the batteries are described.

Mueller, V. C.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Thermal grease replacement for the modular power subsystem

A comparative thermal conductance test was conducted to evaluate thermal interface materials for use on the Modular Power Subsystem. Materials tested included three thermal pads, four RTV adhesives, bare metal, and one thermal grease. The tests were conducted in a bell jar at vacuum conditions using a 1400 square centimeter footprint and two relatively low contact pressures, 207 kPa and 620 kPa. Power inputs ranged from 100 to 500 watts, and the thermal interface conductance values ranged from 100 to 1700 W/m2 C for the interstitial materials tested. In general, the thermal pads performed a little better than bare metal, while the RTV adhesives performed significantly better than the bare metal and comparable to the thermal grease.

Lapinski, John R., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Modular Power Standard for Space Explorations Missions

Future human space exploration will most likely be composed of assemblies of multiple modular spacecraft elements with interconnected electrical power systems. An electrical system composed of a standardized set modular building blocks provides significant development, integration, and operational cost advantages. The modular approach can also provide the flexibility to configure power systems to meet the mission needs. A primary goal of the Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Modular Power System (AMPS) project is to establish a Modular Power Standard that is needed to realize these benefits. This paper is intended to give the space exploration community a "first look" at the evolving Modular Power Standard and invite their comments and technical contributions.

Exploration↗
DOE OSTI2024

Planar Transformer Systems for Modular Power Electronics in Long-Haul, Low-Cost PV Systems

This project successfully developed and verified a new approach for medium voltage (MV) planar transformers for use in emerging, utility-scale, modular PV systems. This approach simplifies their manufacture, improves their isolation capability, lowers their cost, and reduces their volume and loss, while also creating flexibility in the materials that can be used.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nuclear Electric Propulsion Modular Power Conversion Model

This work builds upon a previously examined single loop power conversion cycle for nuclear electric propulsion systems. The intent of this model is to enable examination of trends within the system and extract system parameters that could be used in a mass model to understand how technology performance may impact overall system mass.Several model upgrades were made since the previous work which included physics-based sizing of the turbomachinery and pressure loss inside the radiator. A higher fidelity and modular fluid property code was also developed to help understand the impact of variable fluid properties more accurately and allow for the analysis of different fluids in the same model. The upgraded model features radiator and reactor loops with separate fluids from the Brayton cycle to understand advantages and disadvantages of using multiple working fluids as well as the capability of simulating off nominal system performance. The latter provides a steppingstone for modeling the transient performance of the power conversion system.

NEP↗
NASA NTRS2020

Advanced Modular Power System Fully Populated Electronics Enclosure Thermal Testing

A thermal test of an enclosure housing the AMPS electronics cards was performed. The enclosure was fully populated with 17 nonfunctioning AMPS electronics cards. Heaters were applied to the cards to simulate their operation. A cold plate was installed on the top of the case. The case was then insulated to simulate its installation within an electronics rack with the face and rear of the enclosure left open. The cold plate was connected to a chiller which provided cooling water at a fixed input temperature to the cold plate. Flow rates from the chiller of 0.0 L/min, 1.4 L/min and 1.8 L/min were tested. The test was operated at each flow rate over a range of heater power levels until the steady state temperature of the electronics cards was reached. Heater power levels from 2.5 W/card to 45 W/card were tested. The data collected was used to determine the steady state operating temperature of the cards, the temperature distribution between the cards, the time to reach steady-state temperature, the change in steady state temperature with change in heater power, the temperature distribution between the cards at the steady state condition and the heat lost to the surrounds by the enclosure. One of the main goals of the testing was to determine how much waste heat the cards could generate and still maintain a touch temperature at or below 40°C. Based on this requirement, for the 3 cooling rates tested, the maximum card waste heat that could be generated by each individual card was 3.9 W, 16.3 W and 17.6 W respectively. An analysis was also set up to provide an analytical model to estimate the card temperature under different cold plate flow rates and card heater power levels. The results off the analysis was compared to that of the experiment of the range of flow rates and power levels tested.

Anthony Colozza↗