SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “OpNav”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2021

Concept of Operations for OSIRIS-REx Optical Navigation Image Planning

Optical navigation (OpNav) is a critical subsystem of the OSIRIS-REx asteroid sample return mission, which operated in the vicinity of near-Earth asteroid (101955) Bennu from August 2018 through April 2021. A substantial amount of mission resources across multiple subsystems and institutions is required to ensure that the OpNav data are successfully acquired. The KinetX OpNav team, part of the Flight Dynamics System (FDS), is responsible for performing required analysis to develop the OpNav operations plans; requesting, reviewing and verifying the plans; and ultimately using the image data for critical navigation operations. The FDS team, responsible for the mission navigation, is operated by KinetX Aerospace with management and operations support from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. The Science Processing and Operations Center (SPOC), located at the University of Arizona’s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, is responsible for generating the planning products for all science and most OpNav data. These plans are integrated into the spacecraft sequences, tested, and commanded by the Mission Support Area (MSA) at Lockheed Martin Space. To ensure mission-critical navigation image data are successfully acquired, the plan is developed through a waterfall of planning cycles over the course of 3 months prior to onboard plan execution. During the initial strategic planning for a mission phase, detailed analysis is performed by the OpNav team to conceptualize the concept of operations (ConOps) for image data collection. This phase OpNav Narrative is included along with other strategic planning documents for the key ground segment stakeholders to review and provide feedback. The detailed OpNav plans get defined in the tactical planning cycle, which spans 8 to 3 weeks before the week-long integrated sequence is executed on-board the spacecraft. During the tactical cycle, the initial OpNav Request is submitted along with the science requests, kicking off development of the science and OpNav plans. Once the initial plan is drafted, interfaces are exercised so that the plan can be reviewed and iterated, if necessary. A rigorous schedule is followed by the planning teams during the implementation cycle, spanning the last 18 days before uplink, to ensure all the necessary integration, testing, and reviewing can occur on time. The development of the OpNav planning ConOps, including responsibilities, interfaces, timelines, and procedures, took extensive collaboration across mission elements and institutions. The process was robust throughout the 137 weeks of continuous Optical Navigation Operations at Bennu, which concluded on April 9th, 2021.

Coralie D. Adam↗

NASA NTRS2016

Observations of the Geometry of Horizon-Based Optical Navigation

NASA's Orion Project has sparked a renewed interest in horizon-based optical navigation(OPNAV) techniques for spacecraft in the Earth-Moon system. Some approaches have begun to explore the geometry of horizon-based OPNAV and exploit the fact that it is a conic section problem. Therefore, the present paper focuses more deeply on understanding and leveraging the various geometric interpretations of horizon-based OPNAV. These results provide valuable insight into the fundamental workings of OPNAV solution methods, their convergence properties, and associated estimate covariance. Most importantly, the geometry and transformations uncovered in this paper lead to a simple and non-iterative solution to the generic horizon-based OPNAV problem. This represents a significant theoretical advancement over existing methods. Thus, we find that a clear understanding of geometric relationships is central to the prudent design, use, and operation of horizon-based OPNAV techniques.

Christian, John↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Sensitivity of Optimal Midcourse Correction Scheduling for Robust Cislunar Trajectory Design

A new approach to optimal trajectory design is the determination of optimal trajectories that are robust to initial trajectory dispersions, navigation errors, maneuver execution errors, and environment modeling errors. This paper investigates the sensitivity of cislunar robust optimal trajectory design to launch date, duration of navigation measurement passes, and navigation measurement frequency. For a given cislunar trajectory from translunar injection (TLI) to lunar orbit insertion (LOI), the optimal locations of midcourse corrections, also known as trajectory correction maneuvers (TCM) are determined by minimizing the final 3-σ ∆v subject to a final 3-σ position dispersion constraint for a given launch date, specified measurement pass duration prior to each maneuver, and measurement frequency. Optical navigation (OpNav) is assumed, and OpNav field-of-view (FOV) and lighting constraints are employed. These constraints turn out to be important elements of the problem. The sensitivity of the optimal TCM locations are then investigated by varying the launch date, duration of OpNav measurement passes, and the OpNav measurement frequency, and then re-optimizing the locations of the TCMs. Given the problem parameters provided herein, results show that while the optimal TCM locations with respect to TLI vary greatly from one launch date to another, their locations with respect to LOI are nearly invariant over a 2-month launch window. Results also show that in all cases the optimal location of the last TCM is found to be at the point where the OpNav lunar FOV constraint is first violated. For all other TCMs, OpNav measurement pass duration and measurement frequency can have a moderate to large affect on the optimal TCM locations.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗

NASA NTRS2010

Optical Navigation Plan and Strategy for the Lunar Lander Altair

This paper reviews the currently planned Altair Optical Navigation (OpNav) system. The discussion includes description of the OpNav camera manifest. The Altair OpNav plan envisions one, OpNav camera assembly, with perhaps a functional backup that includes a wide angle-imager (of 40 deg to 60 deg field of view - FOV), and a narrow angle imager (of 1 to 3 deg FOV) co-mounted on a 2-degree-of-freedom gimbal. Both imagers are assumed to be relatively wide aperture and large dynamic range to provide excellent short-exposure images at mid-latitudes, and adequate images of longer-exposure near the poles. Landmark modeling and tracking methodology is discussed, including the stereophotoclinometry method assumed to be used to obtain high-accuracy terrain maps at lunar landing sites of 1 - 2 m, and 50 - 100 m elsewhere, using the images expected to be obtained from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). Characteristics of the OpNav navigation system are discussed and architecture and results from landing simulations presented, showing expected landing accuracies of better than 10m.

TAG↗

NASA NTRS2018

On-Ground Calibration and Optical Alignment for the Orion Optical Navigation Camera

The Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle on-board Navigation System will utilize the Optical Navigation measurements of the Moon and Earth during cis-lunar operations. Misalignment or an un-calibrated optical navigation camera may cause large measurement residuals in any on-board attitude determination and navigation system. Therefore, a novel estimation technique to calibrate the internal camera parameters, and a high accuracy optical alignment procedure to estimate the external camera alignment are introduced in this paper. The intrinsic camera parameters such as the focal length, the principle point offsets, and the camera lens distortion parameters will be estimated and evaluated using images of star fields. This calibration estimation technique can be used either on-ground or in flight. The proposed technique in this paper is using the discrepancy between imaged star vectors attained from the OpNav camera, and the matched star vectors from the star catalog to determine the changes in internal camera parameters. This gave rise to the two basic types of calibration the attitude dependent and attitude independent methods. The former utilizes the errors in imaged and cataloged vectors themselves, and the latter using the discrepancy in angles between pairs of vectors from the camera and catalog. The alignment procedure is carried out using Theodolite autocollimator measurements taken off alignment cubes mounted on the Orion frame and also the measurements from the OpNav focal plane. It is assumed that the alignment cubes and OpNav camera are rigidly mounted to the frame so that flexing effects do not significantly alter the orientation of the cubes relative to the OpNav camera.

Samaan, Malak↗

NASA NTRS2017

Precision Asteroid Astrometry

Among the methods used to guide spacecraft to their destinations, Optical Navigation (OpNav) remains an effective option. OpNav makes use of star fields and small body ephemerides to precisely locate spacecraft. To facilitate accurate OpNav, the small body ephemerides must be constantly updated; asteroid orbits accumulate errors each year of a few milliarcseconds. Through extended exposures, taken with strategic offsets, a least-squares solution can be found that determines updated ephemeris data. This updated data can also be used by occultation astronomers to gain further information about the small bodies, including their size and shape. Using the 24-inch telescope at the Caltech Table Mountain Observatory (TMO), we capture two or more 180 second exposures of each target. These images, combined with a file for the predicted background star field and two reference files, are then processed through a series of scripts and programs. Starting with a prediction file and two to five exposures of the asteroid, the data is processed. This original data is about 32MB per observation. Once the data are reduced to only Right Ascension and Declination for each target, the data are ready for delivery. This consists of text only, and for each target takes about 80 bytes; this resulting data reduction is about five orders of magnitude. This method produces observed positions that are refined by about 12 milliarcseconds, a refinement that is accomplished almost nowhere else. The occultation observations that are facilitated by the ephemerides being refined also produce results that are not possible in any other way from ground-based observations.

Dial, Jason↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Optical Navigation Results Using Historical MESSENGER Data

This paper describes new optical navigation (OpNav) results obtained by processing previously collected measurements from the MESSENGER mission to Mercury. This project also serves to mature the tools and capabilities of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in OpNav, using the open source Goddard Image Analysis and Navigation Tool (GIANT). New navigation measurements are obtained during the Mercury flyby and orbital phases, using OpNav measurements generated by GIANT, and these measurements are compared to predictions. The results obtained provide a set of improvements to be made in navigation tools and will pave the way for future missions to navigate near terrestrial bodies using optical measurements.

Optical Navigation↗

NASA NTRS2024

Demonstration of the Orion Optical Navigation System on Artemis I

The Orion Optical Navigation (OpNav) System is a first-of-its-kind navigation capability that was demonstrated in space on the Artemis I mission. The OpNav System was tested under a variety of conditions, resulting in over one thousand images of Earth, Moon, and starfields. Pairing the images with ground tracking information, not only did Artemis I provide a basis to evaluate the performance of the Orion OpNav system, but produced a valuable set of imagery/data that can be used to further development and testing of other optical navigation systems.

optical navigation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optical Deep-Space Instrument for Navigation (ODIN)

The Optical Deep-Space Instrument for Navigation (ODIN) is a proposed multiple camera, multiple field of view, optical navigation (OPNAV) instrument currently under development. ODIN aims to create a self-sufficient system which can perform imaging target acquisition, star field based attitude estimation, and position estimation using horizon-based OPNAV of known celestial bodies. ODIN will complete these tasks autonomously, thereby contributing to the advancement of OPNAV as an option for truly autonomous mission operations.

Optical Navigation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optical Deep-Space Instrument for Navigation (ODIN)

Optical Navigation↗

NASA NTRS2024

Demonstration of the Orion Optical Navigation System on Artemis I

Optical Navigation↗

NASA NTRS1996

An Automomous Optical Navigation and Control System for Interplanetary Exploration Missions

The first fully autonomous deep-space navigation system ever implemented is planned to guide the New Millenium Deep Space-1 mission to an asteroid and comet beginning in mid-1998. This system is based to a large extent on Optical Navigation (OPNAV) technology developed for the NASA/JPL interplanetary exploration probes Voyager and Galileo. This paper describes the structure and algorithmic content of the Autonomous OPNAV system. The system has several major autonomous functions: picture planning, image analysis, orbit determination, manuever design and general interaction with other onboard autonomous systems.

optical navigation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optical Navigation Attitude Estimation and Calibration Performance Improvement using Outlier Rejection

Spacecraft optical navigation (OpNav) systems process a sequence of images of celestial bodies against a starfield background to estimate the position and velocity of the vehicle. While attitude is sometimes available from an onboard star tracker, it is often desirable to recognize the background stars in the OpNav images to better align the image. While many image processing algorithms exist for finding stars, efficiency and reliability remain key issues in the presence of extended bodies(e.g. the Moon, Earth), especially when attempting to solve the full lost-in-space problem. Some star outliers(stars identified with high residuals)could appear in the camera field of view, however using them in the attitude estimation or camera calibration would lead to less accurate results. Therefore, we require new and robust approaches to remove these outliers before any further processing. The emphasis of the work is on developing a simple and robust iterative technique to detect and reject the outliers which could be found in any frame during the lost in space attitude determination or during the camera calibration. These outliers are determined based on the residuals of the centroids of the detected stars and the corresponding location using the star catalog. If the residuals exceed a predetermined threshold value, the object will be detected as an outlier and will be removed before another attitude determination and calibration iteration is performed. The performance for both attitude determination and on-orbit camera calibration are improved by an almost two-fold increase in accuracy when applying this outlier rejection technique.

OpNav↗

NASA NTRS2024

Artemis I Optical Navigation System Performance

This paper summarizes the assessment of the Optical Navigation Flight Test Objective (FTO) during the flight of Artemis I. The Optical Navigation (OpNav) System was tested under a variety of range, target, and lighting conditions to evaluate the performance compared to the pre-flight predicted error models. In general, OpNav performed very well – successfully processing over a thousand images of starfields, Earth, and Moon. The performance of the algorithm when processing Moon images matched the pre-flight expected error models. The errors when processing Earth images were notably higher than the pre-flight models predicted, however this was found to be due to an over-estimation of the atmosphere bias used in the tuning of the algorithm. After the bias was re-tuned and the images reprocessed, performance significantly improved.

GNC↗

NASA NTRS2011

Methods of Optical Navigation

Optical navigation is the use of onboard imaging to aid in the determination of the spacecraft trajectory and of the targets' ephemerides. Opnav techniques provide a direct measurement of the direction from a spacecraft to target bodies. Opnav data thus complement both radiometric tracking data (for instance, Doppler and range) and the groundbased astrometry which is used to determine the a priori ephemeris of the targets. We present the geometry and camera models which form the mathematical basis for optical navigation and some of the image processing techniques by which one can extract the optical observables--that is, the sample and line coordinates of images--from pictures.

spacecraft navigation↗

NASA NTRS2011

Ground Optical Navigation for the Stardust-Next Mission to Comet 9P/TEMPEL1

Ground-based optical navigation (OpNav) using pictures taken by the Naviga-tion camera on the Stardust spacecraft provided the target-relative information needed to design maneuvers during its approach to comet Tempel 1. Hardware problems, limited downlink bandwidth, and changes in the flight profile affected the OpNav picture schedule, sometimes in near-real time. The Stardust naviga-tion camera and attitude control presented challenges. Picture-processing techniques were developed during approach that included background estimation, co-addition, and co-registration. These techniques, along with adaptive picture scheduling, successfully addressed the challenges.

9P/Temple 1↗

NASA NTRS2016

An Independent Orbit Determination Simulation for the OSIRIS-REx Asteroid Sample Return Mission

After arriving at the near-Earth asteroid (101955) Bennu in late 2018, the OSIRIS-REx spacecraft will execute a series of observation campaigns and orbit phases to accurately characterize Bennu and ultimately collect a sample of pristine regolith from its surface. While in the vicinity of Bennu, the OSIRIS-REx navigation team will rely on a combination of ground-based radiometric tracking data and optical navigation (OpNav) images to generate and deliver precision orbit determination products. Long before arrival at Bennu, the navigation team is performing multiple orbit determination simulations and thread tests to verify navigation performance and ensure interfaces between multiple software suites function properly. In this paper, we will summarize the results of an independent orbit determination simulation of the Orbit B phase of the mission performed to test the interface between the OpNav image processing and orbit determination software packages.

Orbit↗

NASA NTRS2018

Orion Optical Navigation Progress Toward Exploration: Mission 1

Optical navigation of human spacecraft was proposed on Gemini and implemented successfully on Apollo as a means of autonomously operating the vehicle in the event of lost communication with controllers on Earth. It shares a history with the "method of lunar distances" that was used in the 18th century and gained some notoriety after its use by Captain James Cook during his 1768 Pacific voyage of the HMS Endeavor. The Orion emergency return system utilizing optical navigation has matured in design over the last several years, and is currently undergoing the final implementation and test phase in preparation for Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1) in 2019. The software development is being worked as a Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) project delivered as an application within the Core Flight Software of the Orion camera controller module. The mathematical formulation behind the initial ellipse fit in the image processing is detailed in Christian. The non-linear least squares refinement then follows the technique of Mortari as an estimation process of the planetary limb using the sigmoid function. The Orion optical navigation system uses a body fixed camera, a decision that was driven by mass and mechanism constraints. The general concept of operations involves a 2-hour pass once every 24 hours, with passes specifically placed before all maneuvers to supply accurate navigation information to guidance and targeting. The pass lengths are limited by thermal constraints on the vehicle since the OpNav attitude generally deviates from the thermally stable tail-to-sun attitude maintained during the rest of the orbit coast phase. Calibration is scheduled prior to every pass due to the unknown nature of thermal effects on the lens distortion and the mounting platform deformations between the camera and star trackers. The calibration technique is described in detail by Christian, et al. and simultaneously estimates the Brown-Conrady coefficients and the Star Tracker/Camera interlock angles. Accurate attitude information is provided by the star trackers during each pass. Figure 1 shows the various phases of lunar return navigation when the vehicle is in autonomous operation with lost ground communication. The midcourse maneuvers are placed to control the entry interface conditions to the desired corridor for safe landing. The general form of optical navigation on Orion is where still images of the Moon or Earth are processed to find the apparent angular diameter and centroid in the camera focal plane. This raw data is transformed into range and bearing angle measurements using planetary data and precise star tracker inertial attitude. The measurements are then sent to the main flight computer's Kalman filter to update the onboard state vector. The images are, of course, collected over an arc to converge the state and estimate velocity. The same basic technique was used by Apollo to satisfy loss-of-comm, but Apollo used manual crew sightings with a vehicle-integral sextant instead of autonomously processing optical imagery. The software development is past its Critical Design Review, and is progressing through test and certification for human rating. In support of this, a hardware-in-the-loop test rig was developed in the Johnson Space Center Electro-Optics Lab to exercise the OpNav system prior to integrated testing on the Orion vehicle. Figure 2 shows the rig, which the test team has dubbed OCILOT (Orion Camera In the Loop Optical Testbed). Analysis performed to date shows a delivery that satisfies an allowable entry corridor as shown in Figure 3.

Holt, Greg N.↗