Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Solid state battery”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Interface effects on self-forming rechargeable Li/I 2 -based solid state batteries

Solid state batteries are an emerging alternative to traditional liquid electrolyte cells that provide potential for safe and high-energy density power sources. This report describes a self-forming, solid state battery based on the Li/I 2 couple using an LiI-rich LiI(3-hydroxypropionitrile) 2 electrolyte (LiI–LiI(HPN) 2 ). As the negative and positive active materials are generated in situ, the solid electrolyte–current collector interfaces play a critical role in determining the electrochemical response of the battery. Furthermore, we report the investigation of solid electrolyte–current collector interfaces with a self-forming LiI–LiI(HPN) 2 solid electrolyte and the role of varying interface design in reducing resistance during cycling.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Two-layer cathode architecture for high-energy density and high-power density solid state batteries

Solid state batteries with high-energy density and high-power density require the development of thick and energy dense cathodes. Structured cathode electrodes with a double-layer configuration were enabled using a freeze tape casting technique. A bottom dense layer was utilized to enhance the energy density whereas a top porous layer with vertically aligned walls was utilized to enhance the power density. The porous structure of the power layer was achieved by ice templating this layer on top of the densified energy layer of the cathode. This configuration was found to better utilize the active material of the cathodes and was optimized using numerical simulation and computer modeling. Cells with Li metal anode and LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC622) at approximately 5 and 20 mg/cm 2 were cycled at 70 °C at different C-rates. Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with lithium bis-trifluoromethanesulfonimide (LiTFSI) was used for the catholyte and the solid-state electrolyte. The structured cathodes exhibited more than double capacity values as well as better Coulombic efficiency compared to non-structured (single-layer) thick cathodes. In conclusion, synchrotron X-ray tomography and scanning electron microscopy were used to characterize the microstructure of the cathodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2018

Frontiers of solid-state batteries

Solid-state batteries are considered the holy grail of next-generation battery technology, meeting the ever-increasing demand for energy storage that is affordable and safe, with high energy density and long cycle life. Materials and interfaces play a critical role for their eventual success and mass commercialization. This issue of MRS Bulletin focuses on the current state-of-the art of solid-state electrolytes and device architectures and provides a perspective into the various materials and interfacial challenges that limit its performance and stability.

Nanda, Jagjit↗
DOE OSTI2020

Challenges for and Pathways Toward Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries utilizing lithium metal anodes have the potential to enable batteries with a specific energy of >500 Wh/kg and an energy density of >1,500 Wh/L for thousands of cycles. When optimized they will improve the energy efficiency, operating temperature range, sustainability, and safety at a lower cost compared to projections for advanced Li-ion batteries. This improved performance is critical for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles and may enable future applications such as electric aviation. Expectations for solid-state batteries are high, there are significant materials and processing challenges that need to be overcome. Some of these challenges are well known; others are more subtle and are just becoming known. The challenges and their solutions must be clearly identified to realize high-energy solid-state Li metal batteries. In the United States, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) funds the majority of energy storage research and development, including solid state battery research. Web of Science publication analysis shows that worldwide DOE is second largest funder. Work on solid state batteries is distributed across different arms of DOE and is coordinated at headquarters to ensure a broad national portfolio for advanced batteries, including lithium batteries and solid-state battery devices. We note that university and national laboratory researchers in the US with a long-standing interest in solid state batteries is a small, integrated community with recognized impact for publications, patents and startup companies. The opportunity for this group to engage for research with international colleagues is growing, fostered by periodic bilateral meetings supported by DOE and by the recent joint US German research program for lithium battery interface studies. These are valuable opportunities to speed solid-state battery development. The ORNL led virtual workshop, overviewed here, confirms the community’s shared vision of the exciting advances, opportunities, and challenges. Further, we are seeing that this workshop has spawned several new informal collaborations and draft proposals. This encourages us to propose future discussion. On May 11, 2020, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) hosted a 6-hour, on-line national workshop to discuss recent advances and most the prominent obstacles to realizing solid-state Li metal batteries. The workshop included more than 30+ experts from national laboratories, universities, and companies, all of whom have worked on solid-state batteries for multiple years. The participants shared recent advances, many not yet in print, illustrating that the community has gained significant new insights for solid-state Li battery materials over the last 5 years. In this report, the major outcomes of the workshop are organized to identify the gaps in our scientific knowledge for four core materials science areas: (1) Li metal anodes, (2) the solid electrolyte in contact with Li metal, (3) active cathode materials and solid-state composite cathodes, and (4) solid electrolytes. Illustrative examples and discussions are reported with the more comprehensive issues in the report. Discussion of additional challenges related to processing of solid-state battery materials and to the designs and architectures for mechanically robust, long-lived batteries received less attention due to time constraints. These are good themes for deeper discussion at a follow-on workshop, where a complete list of critical research topics can be identified.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2018

Architectural design and fabrication approaches for solid-state batteries

Solid-state batteries are promising candidates for energy storage due to their potential advantages in safety, working temperature range, and energy density compared to traditional liquid-electrolyte-based batteries. Rational battery architecture design and a scalable fabrication approach are critical to realize solid-state batteries. In this article, we present the architecture, fabrication procedure, and related challenges of sulfide and oxide electrolyte-based solid-state batteries. Approaches toward intimate solid–solid contact, thin solid-electrolyte fabrication, and scale-up production are discussed. Lastly, we discuss the future research directions of solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

ARJUNA: An Electrochemical Interface Mapping Probe for Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) are promising candidates for next-generation energy storage, although their performance can be compromised by interfacial heterogeneity within the electrolyte. Furthermore, ensuring the quality of large form-factors electrolyte film is crucial for establishing a robust manufacturing platform for solid-state batteries. Herein, we report on the use of ARJUNA, an electrochemical interface mapping system, to characterize heterogeneities at solid electrolyte interfaces and to serve as a quality control system for SSB manufacturing. In addition to spatial mapping, the proposed system can also probe the interface behavior as a function of pressure and temperature. We present the operating principle, design, instrumentation, and evaluation of the system alongside a typical hybrid solid electrolyte produced using two common manufacturing processes. This report showcases the capability of ARJUNA to probe the heterogeneity and quality of processed solid electrolyte films.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Challenges for and Pathways toward Li-Metal-Based All-Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries utilizing Li metal anodes have the potential to enable improved performance (specific energy >500 Wh/kg, energy density >1500 Wh/L), safety, recyclability, and potentially lower cost (<$100/kWh) compared to advanced Li-ion systems.1,2 These improvements are critical for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) and trucks and could create a short-haul electric aviation industry.1-3 Expectations for solid-state batteries are high, but there are significant materials and processing challenges to overcome.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Atomic- and Molecular-Scale Interphase Engineering for High-Performance Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) promise a decisive advance beyond conventional Li-ion systems, yet their development remains constrained by persistent solid–solid interfacial instabilities that degrade performance and durability. Interfaces between solid electrolytes and both cathodes and Li metal often exhibit poor wettability, limited physical contact, and high charge–transfer resistance, leading to chemical decomposition, mechanical failure, and impedance growth. Overcoming these limitations requires interphase engineering with atomic-scale precision—capabilities that conventional coating methods cannot reliably deliver. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) and molecular layer deposition (MLD) uniquely meet this need by enabling ultrathin, conformal, and composition-tunable films that stabilize reactive surfaces, suppress parasitic reactions, and regulate Li-metal morphology. Importantly, this Perspective highlights ALD/MLD systems that have already demonstrated effectiveness in liquid-electrolyte cells and discusses how these validated strategies can be deliberately translated to solid-state architectures. By grounding future directions in experimentally proven concepts rather than speculative hypotheses, we outline how atomic- and molecular-scale design principles can accelerate the development of robust, high-performance SSB technologies.

atomic and molecular layer deposition↗
DOE OSTI2025

Chemo-Mechanical Behavior and Stability of High-Loading Cathodes in Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries can offer higher energy density and improved safety compared to lithium ion batteries, which use flammable liquid electrolytes. Increasing the ratio of cathode active materials in composite cathodes enhances the energy density and reduces manufacturing costs. Changes in the ratio of cathode active materials alter the microstructure and chemo-mechanical response of a cathode during operation. Understanding the relationship between composition, microstructure, and chemo-mechanical interactions is critical for optimizing solid-state cathodes. Here, in this study, we engineered composite cathodes with varying ratios of LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 and Li 6 PS 5 Cl to systematically investigate the role of microstructural evolution in long-term chemo-mechanical transformations. Chemo-mechanical stresses resulting from the volume changes of the cathode active materials led to degradation mechanisms, such as fracture and interfacial delamination. Active material fracture and delamination led to underutilization of active material and significant capacity decay during cycling. Coatings that suppress active material-active material interactions during cycling may aid in suppressing the generation of local stress hotspots.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Fundamental Understanding of Dynamic Interfacial Phenomena in Solid State Batteries

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) are considered as one of the most promising battery technologies for resolving the intrinsic limitations of current lithium-ion batteries, such as safety and insufficient energy density. However, the degradation associated with interfaces in SSBs is still a critical issue leading to short cycle life. To get fundamental understanding of the failure mechanism of the interfaces, we first developed a comprehensive set of in situ diagnostic techniques combined with atomic/continuum modeling schemes to investigate and understand the coupled mechanical/chemical degradation associated with dynamic interfacial phenomena in SSBs. Specifically, we focused on in situ observations and characterizations of lithium plating-stripping processes, lithium dendrite formation, interphase formation, and the induced interfacial stresses, as well as the mechanical and electrochemical properties of interfaces and interphases. The final project report first gives an overview of the project background, objectives, technical approaches, and final deliverables for all the budget periods; then follows with a summary on main accomplishments based on main tasks. We particularly would like to highlight some capabilities developed from this project which can also be implemented to our advanced battery development.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Synergistic effects of chlorine substitution in sulfide electrolyte solid state batteries

All-solid-state battery is considered as one of the most promising competitors to Li ion batteries. Two widely known performance metrics for solid electrolytes, among others, are ionic conductivity and stability. In this study, it is found that both can be improved by the synergistic effects of chlorine substitution in sulfide-based solid electrolytes. Particularly, instabilities arising from both bulk decompositions and interfacial reactions to electrodes can be better inhibited in the chlorine substituted sulfide solid electrolytes through the increased susceptibility to the mechanical constriction induced enhancement of voltage stability. As a result, the stability window of some chlorine-rich Li-argyrodites can be systematically higher than some other chlorine-deficient or chlorine-free electrolytes, especially under the implementation of the mechanical constriction battery assembly and test conditions. Thus, a solid-state battery system of 4 V to 5 V-class cathodes paired with lithium metal anode is demonstrated using these chlorine-rich Li-argyrodites without additional coatings. Furthermore, since Cl composition modulates the stability and instability of Li-argyrodite at low voltages, it allows us to design a multilayer configuration with a hierarchy of Li metal stabilities to demonstrate the stable cycling at relatively high current densities for solid-state batteries. It is found that a moderate Cl composition in the electrolyte is the best to inhibit Li dendrite penetration as the central electrolyte layer, emphasizing a slightly increased “instability” as the hidden performance metric of relevance here, in addition to the two well-known metrics of stability and ionic conductivity. The understanding of the chlorine substitution effect in sulfide electrolytes provides an important design principle for all-solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Fracture Dynamics in Silicon Anode Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) with silicon anodes could enable improved safety and energy density compared to lithium-ion batteries. However, degradation arising from the massive volumetric changes of silicon anodes during cycling is not well understood in solid-state systems. Here, we use operando X-ray computed microtomography to reveal micro- to macro-scale chemo-mechanical degradation processes of silicon anodes in SSBs. Mud-type channel cracks driven by biaxial tensile stress form across the electrode during delithiation. We also find detrimental cracks at the silicon/ solid electrolyte interface that form due to local reaction competition between neighboring domains of different sizes. Continuum phase-field damage modeling quantifies stress-driven channel cracking and shows that the lithiated silicon stress state is critical for determining the extent of interfacial fracture. This work reveals the mechanisms that govern SSBs compared to conventional lithium-ion batteries and provides guidelines for engineering chemomechanically resilient electrodes for high-energy batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Pressure-Tolerant 3D Anodes Enable Short-Circuit Prevention and Low Heat Generation in Argyrodite Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) offer a safer, higher-energy-density alternative to lithium-ion batteries, yet commercialization is hindered by incompatibility with lithium metal. Here, to overcome these challenges, we developed a cost-effective, commercially available prelithiated micro carbon fiber framework (Li-Cf) anode featuring a high-pressure-tolerance, for use with argyrodite solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). This 3D structure accommodates uniform lithium deposition, simplifies cell assembly under elevated pressure, inhibits dendrite growth toward SSEs, reduces heat generation, and enhances overall compatibility. Notably, our architecture enables the cell to tolerate pressures up to 400 MPa without short-circuiting during assembly. Meanwhile, the 3D framework serves as a preferential pathway for lithium deposition, thereby reducing lithium growth toward the SSEs and mitigating the risk of dendrite formation in SSEs. Operando calorimetry and distribution of relaxation times analysis reveal that lithium morphology degradation at the interface with the SSEs is a key failure mechanism in lithium metal argyrodite SSBs, leading to increased diffusion resistance and heat generation. In contrast, the Li-Cf anode mitigates these issues by reducing both heat flux and charge transfer resistance. Full cells with LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 /Li 6 PS 5 Cl/Li-Cf retain ~79% capacity after 600 cycles, demonstrating significantly improved cycling stability and strong potential for practical energy storage applications.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Decoupling first-cycle capacity loss mechanisms in sulfide solid-state batteries

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) promise more energy-dense storage than liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, first-cycle capacity loss is higher in SSBs than in LIBs due to interfacial reactions. The chemical evolution of key interfaces in SSBs has been extensively characterized. Electrochemically, however, we lack a versatile strategy for quantifying the reversibility of solid electrolyte (SE) redox for established and next-generation SSB electrolytes. In this work, we perform tailored electrochemical tests and operando X-ray diffraction to disentangle reversible and irreversible sources of capacity loss in positive electrodes composed of Li 6 PS 5 Cl SE, Li(Ni 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 )O 2 (NMC), and carbon conductive additives. We leverage an atypically low voltage cutoff (2.0 V vs. Li/Li + ) to quantify the reversibility of SE redox. Using slow (5.5 mA g NMC −1 ) cycling paired with >100 h low-voltage holds, our cells achieve a surprising 96.2% first-cycle coulombic efficiency, which is higher than previously reported (mean: 72%, maximum: 91.6% across surveyed literature). We clarify that sluggish NMC relithiation kinetics have been historically mistaken for permanently irreversible capacity loss. In conclusion, through systematic decoupling of loss mechanisms, we uncover the unexpected reversibility of SE redox and isolate the major contributors to capacity loss, outlining a strategy for accurate assessment of next-generation SE materials and interface modifications.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2025

Characterizing Electrode Materials and Interfaces in Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) could offer improved energy density and safety, but the evolution and degradation of electrode materials and interfaces within SSBs are distinct from conventional batteries with liquid electrolytes and represent a barrier to performance improvement. Over the past decade, a variety of imaging, scattering, and spectroscopic characterization methods has been developed or used for characterizing the unique aspects of materials in SSBs. These characterization efforts have yielded new understanding of the behavior of lithium metal anodes, alloy anodes, composite cathodes, and the interfaces of these various electrode materials with solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the characterization methods and strategies applied to SSBs, and it presents the mechanistic understanding of SSB materials and interfaces that has been derived from these methods. This knowledge has been critical for advancing SSB technology and will continue to guide the engineering of materials and interfaces toward practical performance.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗