Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Transient Testing Reactor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Nuclear fuels for transient test reactors

Transient test reactors with the ability to test fissile specimens under extreme conditions have been crucial tools in the development of nuclear technologies. Less than 10 unique facility designs have ever been constructed, most of which remain operational today and still use the original nuclear fuel constructed for them more than 40 years ago. Historic fuel systems for transient test reactors vary in significant ways which have marked influences on reactor capabilities. Eventually, new fuel will be needed to support the longevity of transient test reactor missions. This paper reviews precedent transient reactor fuel systems in the context of their unique requirements. A few key conclusions are illustrated by comparing and contrasting these transient test reactors. Fuel composites which are mostly graphite can enable transient reactors with very high neutron fluence capability (>2E16 n/cm 2 ) and are amenable to longer “shaped” transients but cannot achieve pulses <10 ms in duration. Reducing the graphite-to-uranium ratio can yield a very narrow pulse capability but delivers less fluence and requires cores with considerably more fissile material. Designs based on uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) make use of readily available materials to create compact cores with narrow pulse width capabilities but with moderate neutron fluence capabilities (~2E15 n/cm 2 ). Uranium zirconium hydride (U-ZrHx) is a well-established fuel system for pulsing reactors which has been intermittently manufactured throughout the decades. U-ZrHx offers similar capabilities to UO 2 designs in terms of nuclear kinetics, but with about half the fluence capability (~1E15 n/cm 2 ). An evolution of the UO 2 system, termed “ternary ceramic” fuel, shows that dispersing UO 2 in zirconium oxide and calcium oxide can increase fluence capability greatly (~7E15 n/cm 2 ), but is not presently a commonly available fuel form. A unique composite of UO 2 and beryllium oxide (UO 2 -BeO) can be used to create a core with similar kinetics and compact core geometry as U-ZrHx designs, but with significantly higher fluence capability (~6E15 n/cm 2 ). Like ternary ceramic fuel, newly fabricated UO 2 -BeO would require reestablishing its historic manufacturing process which would be further complicated by the health hazards associated with beryllium. In conclusion, like most engineering problems, there is no perfect solution, but this paper outlines the advantages and disadvantages of candidate fuel options to help guide detailed evaluations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

A review of cladding failure thresholds in RIA conditions based on transient reactor test data and the need for continued testing

Transient reactor experiments on light water reactor (LWR) fuel pins had been conducted since the beginning of the nuclear era to help determine core coolability and cladding failure thresholds. During one such test in November of 1993 at the CABRI transient test reactor on a test involving a high burnup fuel rod with a corroded Zircaloy-4 cladding it was first observed that cladding failures could occur prior to a departure from nucleate boiling (pre-DNB) at lower-than-expected peak radial average enthalpies. This paper will present an independent review of the publicly available transient reactor test database on higher burnup LWR pins conducted at the CABRI and NSRR reactors as well as review of a selection of published out of pile mechanical testing methods. The purpose of the review is to determine how well the new regulatory limits are supported by experimental data. The review will identify if additional transient reactor tests could provide additional support for the NRC guidance or identify the need for revisions. The evaluation will consider how far the existing database can be extrapolated when considering low hydrogen zirconium alloy claddings (with and without protective coatings) containing very high burnup (> 70 MWd/kgU) UO2 fuel pellets. Finally, the authors will suggest how out of pile mechanical tests can be used in conjunction with a limited number of transient reactor tests to develop cladding specific failure thresholds in RIA type transients.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

A review of cladding failure thresholds in RIA conditions based on transient reactor test data and the need for continued testing

Transient reactor experiments on light water reactor (LWR) fuel pins had been conducted since the beginning of the nuclear era to help determine core coolability and cladding failure thresholds. During one such test in November of 1993 at the CABRI transient test reactor on a test involving a high burnup fuel rod with a corroded Zircaloy-4 cladding it was first observed that cladding failures could occur prior to a departure from nucleate boiling (pre-DNB) at lower-than-expected peak radial average enthalpies. Thirteen additional tests would be performed in the CABRI reactor over the next decade on fuel rods with higher burnups [1]. Additionally, a larger testing program at the NSRR reactor in Japan with high burnup fuel would uncover a similar trend of pre-DNB ruptures in high burnup test rods at lower-than-expected peak enthalpies [2]. Numerous out of pile testing programs involving a variety of innovative mechanical testing techniques have been employed in an attempt to better quantify the failure thresholds of corroded zirconium alloy cladding in these rapid heating and loading conditions [3][4][5]. While previously interim guidance had been issued, in June of 2020 the NRC officially published updated regulatory guidance to account of these pre-DNB failures in Regulatory Guide 1.236 [6]. This paper will present an independent review of the publicly available transient reactor test database on higher burnup LWR pins conducted at the CABRI and NSRR reactors as well as review of a selection of published out of pile mechanical testing methods. The purpose of the review is to determine how well the new regulatory limits are supported by experimental data. The review will identify if additional transient reactor tests could provide additional support for the NRC guidance or identify the need for revisions. The evaluation will consider how far the existing database can be extrapolated when considering low hydrogen zirconium alloy claddings (with and without protective coatings) containing very high burnup (> 70 MWd/kgU) UO2 fuel pellets. Finally, the authors will suggest how out of pile mechanical tests can be used in conjunction with a limited number of transient reactor tests to develop cladding specific failure thresholds in RIA type transients.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Review of Transient Testing of Fast Reactor Fuels in the Transient REActor Test Facility (TREAT)

The restart of the Transient REActor Test (TREAT) facility provides a unique opportunity to engage the fast reactor fuels community to reinitiate in-pile experimental safety studies. Historically, the TREAT facility played a critical role in characterizing the behavior of both metal and oxide fast reactor fuels under off-normal conditions, irradiating hundreds of fuel pins to support fast reactor fuel development programs. The resulting test data has provided validation for a multitude of fuel performance and severe accident analysis computer codes. This paper will provide a review of the historical database of TREAT experiments including experiment design, instrumentation, test objectives, and salient findings. Additionally, the paper will provide an introduction to the current and future experiment plans of the U.S. transient testing program at TREAT.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

TREAT Transient Test Reactor Restart Status

Transient testing involves placing nuclear fuel or material into the core of a nuclear reactor designed to operate at high power for a short time, and subjecting the nuclear fuel or material to short bursts of intense, high power radiation. After the experiment is completed, the fuel or material is analyzed to determine the effects of the radiation. The results are then used in fuel or material design and/or qualification. Transient testing is required for essentially all nuclear fuel design and qualification efforts to learn how nuclear fuel will respond during accidents involving transient overpower and/or under cooling events. For example, nuclear fuel may fragment when exposed to higher than normal power. This fragmentation can cause unacceptable performance. Transient testing is also needed to validate performance models for nuclear fuel and materials. These models, when validated, will dramatically shorten the development and qualification life cycle for nuclear fuels, supporting rapid development of low emissions, reliable power generation. In the past, transient testing was primarily done in facilities that no longer exist. The U.S. Department of Energy evaluated how to provide the required transient testing capability and, following completion of the National Environmental Policy Act process, they selected the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility to resume transient testing. TREAT is located at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The TREAT reactor was used from 1959 to 1994 to conduct more than 2,500 nuclear fuel transient tests, and was placed in standby in 1994. TREAT is capable of transients in excess of 19 GW. The paper describes the progress towards restart. The restart efforts have revealed that the plant fuel and equipment is acceptable for future operations. The safety basis development, procedures, and training are well under way. Experiment capability preparations are in progress. Reactor startup is anticipated no later than 2018. (author)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Advanced Instrumentation for Transient Reactor Testing

Transient testing involves placing fuel or material into the core of specialized materials test reactors that are capable of simulating a range of design basis accidents, including reactivity insertion accidents, that require the reactor produce short bursts of intense highpower neutron flux and gamma radiation. Testing fuel behavior in a prototypic neutron environment under high-power, accident-simulation conditions is a key step in licensing nuclear fuels for use in existing and future nuclear power plants. Transient testing of nuclear fuels is needed to develop and prove the safety basis for advanced reactors and fuels. In addition, modern fuel development and design increasingly relies on modeling and simulation efforts that must be informed and validated using specially designed material performance separate effects studies. These studies will require experimental facilities that are able to support variable scale, highly instrumented tests providing data that have appropriate spatial and temporal resolution. Finally, there are efforts now underway to develop advanced light water reactor (LWR) fuels with enhanced performance and accident tolerance. These advanced reactor designs will also require new fuel types. These new fuels need to be tested in a controlled environment in order to learn how they respond to accident conditions. For these applications, transient reactor testing is needed to help design fuels with improved performance. In order to maximize the value of transient testing, there is a need for in-situ transient realtime imaging technology (e.g., the neutron detection and imaging system like the hodoscope) to see fuel motion during rapid transient excursions with a higher degree of spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy. There also exists a need for new small, compact local sensors and instrumentation that are capable of collecting data during transients (e.g., local displacements, temperatures, thermal conductivity, neutron flux, etc.).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Conceptual Phase Neutronic and Thermal Analyses for the LEU Conversion of the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT)

The Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) is an experimental reactor designed for transient testing of nuclear reactor fuels and other materials. TREAT is located at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). It was operated from 1959 until 1994, when it was placed on nonoperational standby. Preparations for the restart of TREAT are now underway. Simultaneously, work is being performed to support the conversion of TREAT from its current high enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to low enriched uranium (LEU, defined as uranium with less than 20% {sup 235}U) fuel, under the support of the Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Material Management and Minimization (M{sup 3}) reactor conversion program. Following the pre-conceptual phase of the TREAT conversion project (which included assessments of conversion feasibility, including LEU fuel element fabrication feasibility), conceptual phase work was performed to evaluate potential LEU fuel element designs for TREAT. Simultaneously, activities including scale-up development work for fuel fabrication and mock-up element production were performed by the INL Fuel Engineering and Design (FED) team. Utilizing the lessons learned in the analysis and fabrication work, an LEU conceptual design description was collaboratively established and evaluated in detail. A summary of this work and corresponding example results are presented here. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Baseline Radiological Conditions for the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Restart

The Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility, located on the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), northwest of the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC), has been in programmatic shutdown for more than twenty-three years. Construction of TREAT by the Teller Construction Co., Portland, Oregon, was started in February, 1958, and completed in early November, 1958. The reactor first achieved criticality on February 23, 1959. Operations continued until April 28, 1994, when the reactor was shut down due to the lack of a programmatic mission. Recently, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) identified a need to resume transient testing of new reactor fuels. The Resumption of Transient Testing Program (RTTP) has readied the TREAT facility to resume transient testing operations. The first reactor criticality since the shut down in 1994 was achieved on November 14, 2017. This report details the radiological measurements taken in the TREAT Reactor Building and the surrounding environment prior to and just after its restart in order to characterize the radiological conditions that existed prior to and during the initial restart operations. The authors would like to acknowledge the support from RTTP Management and the TREAT Operations staff for allowing the extensive radiological surveys, as well as the health physics technicians from the INL Radiological Control organization who performed many of the measurements referenced in this report.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Final Report for the Contractor Readiness Assessment of the Transient Reactor Test Facility Resumption of Transient Testing Activity at the Idaho National Laboratory

The purpose of this review was to verify readiness for the TREAT restart of transient testing activity at the INL and inform the startup authorization authority decision-making for startup authorization by providing a deliberate and managed determination of the state of readiness preparation and determination of whether operations can be performed safely. Verification of readiness included assuring that equipment operability, procedure viability, and personnel knowledge, skills, and performance are adequate for operations. Because the TREAT (including restart of transient testing activity) is a hazard category-2 nuclear facility and because reactor operation and transient testing activities were suspended for programmatic and funding reasons in excess of a year, DOE O 425.1D required that both a contractor and DOE RA be satisfactorily completed prior to startup of the TREAT and restart of transient testing activity. To this end, DOE directed that a CRA and federal RA be conducted. The CRA IP defined the depth of the CRA through the objectives and CRADs, delineated in Appendix A of the IP; established roles and responsibilities for CRA team activities; and established processes, practices, and protocols for preparation, conduct, documentation, and reporting of the CRA. The approaches and methodologies identified in the IP were used to verify that the BEA management team has established SSCs, developed personnel capabilities and competencies, and implemented safety features, programs, and procedures in a manner that provides reasonable assurance for adequate protection of workers, the public, and the environment in preparation for and execution of the TREAT restart of transient testing activity. This CRA was intended to confirm that (1) the facility is in a state of readiness to safely conduct operations in accordance with the safety basis; and (2) the management control programs are in place to ensure safe operations can be sustained. This equated to mature implementation of the integrated safety management (ISM) in conjunction with implementation of the individual facility authorization basis. This CRA was structured to verify the readiness to conduct restart of transient testing activity safely, and that facility programs were in place to support the restart of transient testing activity.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Multiphysics Simulation of the NASA SIRIUS-CAL Fuel Experiment in the Transient Test Reactor Using Griffin

After approximately 50 years, NASA is restarting efforts to develop nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) for interplanetary missions. Building upon nuclear engine tests performed from the late 1950s to the early 1970s, the present research and testing focuses on advanced materials and fabrication methods. A number of transient tests have been performed to evaluate materials performance under high-temperature, high-flux conditions, with several more experiments in the pipeline for future testing. The measured data obtained from those tests are being used to validate the Griffin reactor multiphysics code for this particular type of application. Griffin was developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) using the MOOSE framework. This article describes the simulation results of the SIRIUS-CAL calibration experiment in the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT). SIRIUS-CAL was the first transient test conducted on NASA fuels, and although the test was performed with a relatively low core peak power, the test specimen survived a temperature exceeding 900 K. Griffin simulations of the experiment successfully matched the reactor’s power transient after calibrating the initial control rod position to match the initial reactor period. The thermal-hydraulics model largely matches the time-dependent response of a thermocouple located within the experiment specimen to within the uncertainty estimate. However, the uncertainty range is significant and must be reduced in the future.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Refined BISON-Griffin Workflow For Designing Targeted TRISO Transient Experiments In The Transient Reactor Test Facility

U.S. industry is expected to deploy tristructural isotropic (TRISO) particle fuel technologies for commercial reactors within the next decade. In our previous work, we defined a preliminary transient design space for TRISO fuels, identified potential gaps in the available data, and began to develop multiphysics modeling tools that could be applied to design targeted Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) experiments to fill these gaps. This work builds on that foundation by (1) updating BISON fuel performance and Griffin reactor physics models to reflect the current TREAT experiment tube and capsule designs,(2) coupling the codes to improve the accuracy and usability of the transient design analyses, and (3) demonstrating their use over an expanded design space that includes fuel burnup. The simulated mechanical responses of the TRISO particles were complex functions of fission product accumulation, fission gas release, and irradiation-induced dimensional change in the pyrolytic carbon layers. Predicted tangential stresses in particle silicon carbide layers were least compressive for preheated tests involving fresh fuels but remained compressive throughout the ranges of temperature, heat rate, and burnup considered in this work. Finally, comparisons between the potential TREAT transients and historical test reactor irradiations showed that the TREAT tests would produce significantly lower average energy deposition rates, yielding less severe transients with greater relevance to near-term commercial applications. Use of these predictive capabilities has the potential to increase the value of each test, improving the overall efficiency and cost effectiveness of transient testing for TRISO and other advanced fuels.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Reactivation of the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Neutron Radiography Program

Reactivation of the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Neutron Radiography Program The Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility is a 19,000 MW reactor located at the Idaho National Laboratory designed to perform transient testing on nuclear fuel experiments and materials. A neutron radiography facility was installed with the first radiograph being produced in 1967 that utilized the indirect (or transfer) method of neutron radiography to examine irradiated nuclear fuels and experiment test loops. The TREAT neutron radiography facility performed approximately 5,000 radiographs by the spring of 1977. The original radiography facility was upgraded in 1974-1975 to correct previous deficiencies and to improve capabilities. In 1986, an upgraded aperture was installed to increase the resolution of images followed by a major reactor upgrade completed in 1988. Overall, the existing neutron radiography system was in good working order. Originally built in 1958, the TREAT Facility was in operation until it was placed in a shutdown status in 1994. Following the Fukishima disaster and seeing a need for enhanced accident tolerant fuels, the United Stated Department of Energy decided to restart the TREAT facility and resume transient operations. In November 2017, the TREAT reactor was successfully restarted and is currently performing operational testing in preparation for initial experiment irradiations and transient testing. This paper reports on efforts to reactivate the TREAT neutron radiography station. A few minor shielding and system improvement upgrades have been completed along with the installation of a dedicated room for computed radiography equipment. Detailed beam characterization work was not performed following the last reactor upgrade. To characterize the neutron beam, gold foil activation measurements were made to determine an average neutron flux and flux profile. Additional multi-foil activation measurements will be made to calculate the energy spectrum. An open beam image will be taken that will provide the information about variations in the beam profile. A series of system qualification shots will also take place to accurately determine the effective image quality and image acquisition parameters. Full operational status of the TREAT neutron radiography system is scheduled for late summer of 2018.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Assessment of Thermal Stratification in Versatile Test Reactor Transients

The Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) is a fast-spectrum test reactor currently being developed in the United States under the direction of the US Department of Energy. The conceptual design of the 300 MWth pool-type sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) has been led by the US National Laboratories in collaboration with General Electric-Hitachi and Bechtel National Inc. Safety performance analysis for the VTR conceptual design is being performed with the systems thermal-hydraulics (SYSTH) module of the SAS4A/SASSYS-1 liquid-metal reactor safety analysis code system. Since the current model of the VTR employs a simple perfect mixing model for large plena like the hot pool, it is not able to predict temperature variations that may develop during the transient. Prior work simulating the response of SFRs to postulated events like the Protected Station Blackout (PSBO) has shown that the phenomenon of thermal stratification, where stable thermal layers accumulate in the hot pool, may delay the transition to natural circulation and thus impact the predicted transient progression. Thus, an effort has begun to model this transient by integrating a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model of the hot pool into the SAS4A/SASSYS-1 model of the Primary Heat Transport System during the simulation of the PSBO event. A three-dimensional Volume-Of-Fluid CFD model of the VTR hot pool has been developed for the co-simulation of SAS4A/SASSYS-1 with CFD. In this work, the standalone SAS4A/SASSYS-1 calculation and the standalone CFD calculation based on the SAS4A/SASSYS-1 calculation result were produced on the Idaho National Laboratory High Performance Computing cluster, SAWTOOTH. At this time, only the standalone CFD and SAS4A/SASYS-1 simulation results are provided.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) Startup Status

Transient testing is critical for understanding how new fuels perform in accident conditions such as transient overpower and/or under cooling events. In February of 2014, The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was appropriate for the resumption of transient testing of nuclear fuels and materials. At that point, work began on the restart of the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT), which was the DOE preferred alternative for reestablishing transient testing capability for nuclear fuels and materials in the U.S. Significant progress has been made in the restart of TREAT for transient testing since the FONSI in 2014. The progress made since 2014 towards restarting TREAT and the current status is documented in this summary. (author)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Safety Analysis Challenges With Restart of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility

Safety Analysis Challenges With Restart of the Idaho National Laboratory Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Dr. James Parry David Broussard Anthony LaPorta Douglas Gerstner Battelle Energy Alliance Idaho National Laboratory P.O. Box 1625/MS6194 Idaho Falls, ID 83415 The Transient Reactor Test Facility, commonly referred to as TREAT, is an air-cooled, thermal spectrum test reactor facility designed to: • Induce intense fission heating in the nuclear fuel being tested. • Test nuclear reactor fuels under severe reactor-accident conditions. • Study fuel meltdowns, metal-water reactions, interactions between overheated fuel and coolant, and the transient behavior of fuels for high-temperature systems. • Provide nondestructive test data through neutron radiography of fuel samples. • Allow for the detailed monitoring of the experiments during the test. TREAT was specifically designed to test prototypic-sized reactor fuel pins and bundles under transient power conditions. During its 35 year operating history, it conducted thousands of transient experiments. Today, these capabilities are required for predicting safety margins for next generation fuels and advanced reactor design safety. Even though TREAT has not operated since 1994, return to operable conditions and resumption of testing will occur in FY 2018. This paper discusses the unique challenges with performing and documenting the safety analyses that demonstrate that the TREAT restart may be performed safely. This includes a discussion of 1) the TREAT capability, design, and operations, 2) identification of the format and content of the required safety basis document changes, and 3) demonstration that the consequences of potential accidents during TREAT operations meet the consequence guidelines.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) Update for the Fuel Conversion Effort at the Transient Reactor Test Facility

Over the lifetime of the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) reactor from 1959 to 1994, a series of historical tests disclosed certain material specific requisites for irradiation testing variables resulted in negligible structural damage after exposure to the reactor and multiple experiments. Comparable fuel design, material testing, and qualifications needs to occur for the high-enriched uranium (HEU) to low enriched uranium (LEU) fuel conversion (<20% U235) of TREAT. This includes, retaining a uniform precipitate dispersion of fueled UO2 micron-size particles throughout a graphite-moderating matrix, where high-density graphite is in direct contact with the fuel and acts as a moderator. On that note, the design of future LEU reactor TREAT fuel core will consider the relative sizing and spacing of fuel as well as the retention of graphite in accordance with the expected thermal, neutron, and energy portfolio for future conversion. In light of the above, LEU conversion fuel blocks currently being manufactured must undergo critical materials testing, irradiation, and examination to determine effects on the manufactured replacement fuel blocks at the millimeter to sub-micron size scale. Herein, we will report and update the community on value-added studies focusing on spark plasma sintering as an alternative technique to fabricate high density graphite dispersion fuel.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2017

Modeling the Transient Reactor Test Loop in TRACE for PWR Critical Heat Flux Benchmarking

Understanding transient critical heat flux (CHF) resulting from a Reactivity Insertion Accident (RIA) in nuclear systems is an extremely undeveloped field. Though many experiments have been done for CHF, remarkably few have been done for rods at PWR operating temperature and pressure (300 deg. C, 2200 psia) with a short time constant ramp in power. This leads to many concerns regarding understanding how RIA scenarios develop and evolve in commercial nuclear reactors. With a limited understanding of the phenomenology governing transient CHF, there is little hope in being able to accurately model these scenarios using today's thermal hydraulic codes. The Accident Tolerant Fuels (ATF) Program established by the Department of Energy (DOE) is seeking out new fuel and cladding systems that can be used to reduce the probability and consequences of severe accidents. To better understand this phenomenon, the DOE is restarting the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). TREAT will be able to provide representative neutronic boundary conditions for testing coupled thermal hydraulics on the Transient Water Environment Recirculating Loop (TWERL) to study transient CHF with the best representation possible. To support this task, Oregon State University (OSU) is designing and building a representative flow loop that will be able to mimic the conditions of TWERL (sans the neutronic boundary conditions) to create a benchmark study for existing lumped parameter thermal-hydraulic codes such as RELAP5 and TRACE. This flow loop, the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TRTL), will support the ATF program by providing much needed NQA-1 data for transient CHF at operating temperature and pressure.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Updates to the Generation of Physics Data Inputs for MAMMOTH Simulations of the Transient Reactor Test Facility - FY2016

The INL is currently evolving the modeling and simulation (M&S) capability that will enable improved core operation as well as design and analysis of TREAT experiments. This M&S capability primarily uses MAMMOTH, a reactor physics application being developed under Multi-physics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework. MAMMOTH allows the coupling of a number of other MOOSE-based applications. This second year of work has been devoted to the generation of a deterministic reference solution for the full core, the preparation of anisotropic diffusion coefficients, the testing of the SPH equivalence method, and the improvement of the control rod modeling. In addition, this report includes the progress made in the modeling of the M8 core configuration and experiment vehicle since January of this year.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗