Update on R&D Progress by DOE
Update on R&D progress DOE for High Temperature Materials presented for GIF VHTR Materials PMB Meeting Manchester for DOE.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “VHTR materials”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
NDMAS
Overview of Current ART-GCR Data: Fuel Fabrication, Irradiation Monitoring (Fuel & Graphite – near real-time for HDG-1), Post-Irradiation Examination (Fuel & Graphite), Graphite Characterization (Baseline and Irradiated), High Temperature Metals Mechanical Tests, Design, Methods, and Validation Data, Japan Atomic Energy Agency’s High Temperature Test Reactor (HTTR), Argonne National Laboratory’s Natural convection Shutdown heat removal Test Facility (NSTF), Oregon State University’s High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF), Generation IV International VHTR Materials Handbook, Additional related data, and Advanced Test Reactor operations (near real-time).
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Gen IV International Forum Interactions
Gen IV International Forum Interactions and how this applies to working groups for Hi-temp Reactor Systems and specific technical areas for each GIF reactor system. This includes Very-High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) and Material (MAT) and how R&D is shared and managed.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Results of FY 2023 Alloy 617 and Alloy 709 High-Temperature Crack-Growth Testing
This report summarizes the work performed at Idaho National Laboratory under the “Creep, fatigue and creep-fatigue crack growth tests” task of the “Long-Term VHTR Material Qualification – INL” work package. Work was performed this year to validate the crack growth monitoring setup used with the test frames against both continuous crack length monitoring using an optical camera, as well as post-mortem analysis of marker bands on the fracture surface. Delays prevented the use of a gauge to measure load-line displacement for early tests, and so the creep-fatigue crack growth setup was evaluated using the actuator displacement for a load-line displacement setup. While not ideal, this allowed examination of the shortcomings with the current software setup that was originally designed for performing stress corrosion crack growth rate studies. The method for data collection was modified to link the crack growth monitoring software with Instron’s Wave Matrix software. Once the load-line displacement gauge arrived, the crack growth equipment was successfully modified to permit continuous monitoring of both load-line displacement and crack length. This is critical for creep-fatigue and creep crack growth rate studies for ductile material, as it permits the C* and Ct analyses. Test results are shown for Alloy 617 fatigue and creep-fatigue (without the gauge for load-line displacement measurements), as well as creep-fatigue of Alloy 709, which was performed with the completed test setup, allowing for crack length and load-line displacement monitoring.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
TRISO Fuel Performance Evaluation
TRISO Fuel Performance Evaluation outlining design and radionuclide source term, fuel performance during normal operation, fuel performance during core heatup accidents, other accident scenarios, and GenIV VHTR Fuel and Fuel Cycle PMB.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Effects of Geometric Discontinuities on Creep Behavior of Alloy 617
Due to the excellent long-term high-temperature performance of Alloy 617, the Alloy has been identified as the primary structural material for the intermediate heat exchanger of the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR). Both the base and welded alloy has been qualified to be used up to 950 °C up to 100,000 hours by the American Society of Mechanical Engineer (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC). The qualification properties of the material were exclusively determined by uniaxial creep tests. The components may, however, experience multiaxial stress conditions in service due to the reactor geometry. This study used notched creep tests to investigate the effect of geometric discontinuities on creep behavior of both the base and welded Alloy 617. The V-notch tests reveal that the geometric discontinuities do not reduce the creep rupture live under high and intermediate stress conditions. The U-notch tests show that a larger radius notch behave in a similar way as a straight gauge section of a uniaxial test. The creep rupture live of the welded alloy was slightly longer than the base metal.
36 - MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
Status of U.S. DOE Deliverables 0 July 2023
An annual status of the US TRISO fuel qualification program is provided, with a focus on activities linked to the Generation IV International Forum (GIF) Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Fuel and Fuel Cycle (FFC) Project Management Board (PMB).
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Evaluating Nuclear Forensic Signatures for Advanced Reactor Deployment: A Research Priority Assessment
The development and deployment of a new generation of nuclear reactors necessitates a thorough evaluation of techniques used to characterize nuclear materials for nuclear forensic applications. Advanced fuels proposed for use in these reactors present both challenges and opportunities for the nuclear forensic field. Many efforts in pre-detonation nuclear forensics are currently focused on the analysis of uranium oxides, uranium ore concentrates, and fuel pellets since these materials have historically been found outside of regulatory control. The increasing use of TRISO particles, metal fuels, molten fuel salts, and novel ceramic fuels will require an expansion of the current nuclear forensic suite of signatures to accommodate the different physical dimensions, chemical compositions, and material properties of these advanced fuel forms. In this work, a semi-quantitative priority scoring system is introduced to identify the order in which the nuclear forensics community should pursue research and development on material signatures for advanced reactor designs. This scoring system was applied to propose the following priority ranking of six major advanced reactor categories: (1) molten salt reactor (MSR), (2) liquid metal-cooled reactor (LMR), (3) very-high-temperature reactor (VHTR), (4) fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR), (5) gas-cooled fast reactor (GFR), and (6) supercritical water-cooled reactor (SWCR).
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Summary Report Of The FY25 Reactor Physics Verification And Validation Exercises In The Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas-cooled Reactor Program
Valdiation and verification of numerical tools is critical for ensuring reasonable predictions for design scoping, licensing, and safety analsyis. In this report, two reactor physics verification and validation exercises are presented. The first of these exercises focuses on burnup analysis with data from the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program. Simulations are performed with Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) and are compared with the experimental measurements for the AGR 1 and 2 experiments that utilize both UCO and UO2 fuel. The second exercises utilizes data from the HTR-Proteus experiments to perform reactor physics validation. Specifications of the experimental facility are provdied, along with a demonstration of initial modeling efforts in Serpent for one of the determistic packing experiments. Both cases are part of the Generation-IV international forum (GIF) Very High-Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Computational Methods, Validation, and Benchmarking (CMVB) program, an international collaborative organization dedicated to the verification and validation of High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) analysis. Participation in the CMVB allows the US Department of Energy (DOE) to leverage these existing validation activities to provide extra value through benchmarking activities with other CMVB members.
and Benchmarking (CMVB) program↗
HDG-1 Graphite Preirradiation Data Package Report
This report documents all pre-irradiation examination material-property measurement data for graphite specimens that are going to be used within the first high dose graphite (HDG) -1 irradiation capsule. The two new HDG capsules signify a major change to the AGC Experiment. HDG-1 and HDG-2 will replace the last two Advanced Graphite Creep (AGC) capsules (AGC-5 and AGC-6) which were designed to irradiate graphite at the extreme upper operational temperatures for a very-high-temperature reactor (VHTR) design, 1100°C. These very high temperature AGC-5 and AGC-6 capsules have been repurposed to re-irradiated specimens (from AGC-2, AGC-3, and AGC-4) at the lower temperatures of 600°C and 800°C. HDG-1 will be irradiated at 600°C and HDG-2 will be irradiated at 800°C. By re-irradiating the previous AGC specimens a total maximum neutron dose of around 15 dpa (displacements per atom) can be achieved for all major graphite grades at irradiation temperatures of 600°C and 800°C. Specimens in the HDG-1 capsule are made up of previously irradiated specimens from the AGC-2 capsule and unirradiated specimens prepared for the now discontinued AGC-5 capsule. Utilizing the irradiated specimens, a maximum neutron dose of around 15 dpa is anticipated. These new maximum dose levels will provide irradiated material property data over a total neutron dose range of 1-15 dpa at a temperature of 600°C when combined with the previous AGC-1 and AGC-2 irradiation data. This will provide quantitative data necessary for predicting the irradiation behavior and operating performance of new nuclear graphite grades for use within high temperature reactor designs. Similar to previous AGC test trains, HDG-1 includes the major graphite grades (IG-110, NBG-17, NBG-18, PCEA, and 2114) as well as adding the very fine-grain grade IG-430 which is of interest to the Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) designs. Also new to the HDG-1 capsule are 90 smaller geometry specimens designated as pencil specimens. These specimens take up only one third the space of a standard creep size specimen. This increased number of specimens will enhance property measurement statistics because they will provide 3 times the control specimen data at a position that would otherwise only have a single measurement.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Informing and Engaging the Future Workforce on Generation IV International Forum Reactor Systems
Generation IV reactors are six nuclear reactor designs, Sodium Fast reactor (SFR), Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR), Gas cooled Fast Reactor (GFR), Molten Salt Reactor (MSR), Lead Fast Reactor (LFR), and Supercritical Water Reactor (SCWR), that are considered to be the most promising in light of various criteria based on the following objectives: • continuation of the progress made by Generation III water reactors in terms of competitiveness and safety; • more effective use of uranium resources; • less radioactive waste, especially high-level, long-lived waste; • greater protection against malicious acts and the diversion or theft of nuclear materials. The GIF Education and Training Working Group (ETWG) launched two major initiatives in 2016 and in 2021 to not only inform and educate but also to engage the future workforce in support of these reactor systems. This paper will present an overview of the GIF EWTG webinar series as well as the 2021 Pitch your Gen IV Research Competition which is followed by the 2023 Pitch your Gen IV Research. Competition
Paviet, Patricia D.↗
Baseline Characterization Database Verification Report - NBG-18 Billet 635-14
The purpose of this Engineering Calculations and Analysis Report is to present the data being collected in the Baseline Graphite Characterization program, which is directly tasked with supporting the Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL’s) research and development efforts on the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP)/Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR)/Advanced Reactor Technology (ART). This program is populating a comprehensive database that will reflect the baseline properties of nuclear-grade graphite regarding individual grade, billet, and position within individual billets. The physical and mechanical property information being collected will be transferred to the NGNP Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS), and from that database will help populate handbook of property data available to member nations of the Generation IV International Forum (GIF).
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Complete Survey of Fuel Candidates for Microreactor Purposes
This report summarizes various fuel types that may be applicable to several microreactor concepts, which are defined as (1) very high temperature reactors (VHTR), (2) sodium fast reactors (SFR), (3) system for nuclear auxiliary power (SNAP) reactors, (4) gas fast reactors (GFR), and (5) molten salt reactors (MSR). The fuel systems that were assessed include: uranium mononitride (UN), uranium monocarbide (UC), uranium dioxide (UO 2 ), uranium oxycarbide (UCO) Tristructural Isotropic (TRISO), UN TRISO, mixed oxide (MOX), metallic fuels, and metal hydrides. While UCO TRISO has undergone significant testing through the advanced gas reactor (AGR) program, the very high cost necessitates consideration of other fuel types. UN and UC were identified as fuels that should receive further investigation due to their thermophysical and mechanical properties. Minimal irradiation performance data shows that these fuels are good candidate fuels for microreactors.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
An Assessment of Nuclear Fuel Options for Microreactors
A design options trade-off study was conducted for various nuclear fuel system options. This study developed requirements for ideal fuel system characteristics and weighted ranking criteria specifically for microreactor designs. A semiquantitative method of consensus ranking on a numeric scale was used with input from several nuclear fuel experts. The purpose of this study was to assess options and provide recommendations for further nuclear fuel technology development to better support small reactor cores. Modern microreactor designs have only recently begun emerging and have little in common except their diminutive size. The purpose of this study was not to determine which reactor type is best (e.g., coolant type and/or neutron energy spectrum), but rather to assess fuel system options within five broad categories of reactor types inspired by: 1) Very High Temperature Reactors (VHTR), 2) Sodium Fast Reactors (SFR), 3) System for Nuclear Auxiliary Power (SNAP) reactors, 4) Gas Fast Reactor (GFR), and 5) Molten Salt Reactors (MSR). The order in which these reactor types were listed generally represents the amount of current interest and technological maturity in the microreactor development community (in descending order). As such, the conclusions drawn for each reactor type category have varying levels of certainty, but there is confidence in the general conclusion that known fuel technologies can support small reactors, but that microreactors will be able to maximize their performance potential if these fuel systems were further optimized. These optimization opportunities were found to revolve around increasing uranium loading and improving behaviors/understanding for long time-at-temperature conditions. Further details about these recommendations can be found in the concluding section of this report.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Space and Terrestrial Power System Integration Optimization Code BRMAPS for Gas Turbine Space Power Plants With Nuclear Reactor Heat Sources
In view of the difficult times the US and global economies are experiencing today, funds for the development of advanced fission reactors nuclear power systems for space propulsion and planetary surface applications are currently not available. However, according to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 the U.S. needs to invest in developing fission reactor technology for ground based terrestrial power plants. Such plants would make a significant contribution toward drastic reduction of worldwide greenhouse gas emissions and associated global warming. To accomplish this goal the Next Generation Nuclear Plant Project (NGNP) has been established by DOE under the Generation IV Nuclear Systems Initiative. Idaho National Laboratory (INL) was designated as the lead in the development of VHTR (Very High Temperature Reactor) and HTGR (High Temperature Gas Reactor) technology to be integrated with MMW (multi-megawatt) helium gas turbine driven electric power AC generators. However, the advantages of transmitting power in high voltage DC form over large distances are also explored in the seminar lecture series. As an attractive alternate heat source the Liquid Fluoride Reactor (LFR), pioneered at ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) in the mid 1960's, would offer much higher energy yields than current nuclear plants by using an inherently safe energy conversion scheme based on the Thorium --> U233 fuel cycle and a fission process with a negative temperature coefficient of reactivity. The power plants are to be sized to meet electric power demand during peak periods and also for providing thermal energy for hydrogen (H2) production during "off peak" periods. This approach will both supply electric power by using environmentally clean nuclear heat which does not generate green house gases, and also provide a clean fuel H2 for the future, when, due to increased global demand and the decline in discovering new deposits, our supply of liquid fossil fuels will have been used up. This is expected within the next 30 to 50 years, as predicted by the Hubbert model and confirmed by other global energy consumption prognoses. Having invested national resources into the development of NGNP, the technology and experience accumulated during the project needs to be documented clearly and in sufficient detail for young engineers coming on-board at both DOE and NASA to acquire it. Hands on training on reactor operation, test rigs of turbomachinery, and heat exchanger components, as well as computational tools will be needed. Senior scientist/engineers involved with the development of NGNP should also be encouraged to participate as lecturers, instructors, or adjunct professors at local universities having engineering (mechanical, electrical, nuclear/chemical, and/or materials) as one of their fields of study.
Juhasz, Albert J.↗
Summary Report Of The FY25 Computational Fluid Dynamics Verification And Validation Exercises In The Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas-cooled Reactor Program
Verification and Validation (V&V) of numerical tools is critical for ensuring reasonable predictions during design, safety analysis, and licensing. Recent work in the Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas-cooled Reactor (ART-GCR) program has focused on V&V of common Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tools that are used within the Untied States. This report presents an update on these CFD V&V activities. These Generation IV Forum (GIF) Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Computational Methods, Validation, and Benchmarking (CMVB) is an international organization dedicated to the verification and validation of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) simulation tools. Participation in the CMVB provides additional value to the V&V activities, as it allows for access to a wider range of data, and provides valuable benchmarking exercises. Three HTGR phenomena are targeted: Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS) performance, core bypass flow, and lower plenum mixing. Simulations of the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW-Madison) RCCS facilities are performed with Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) in StarCCM+. Results are compared for both forced and natural convection conditions, with both exhibiting good agreement with experimental measurements. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) matched index of refraction (MIR) and Korean Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) bypass flow expeirments are used to validation CFD predictions of bypass flow. Simulations are performed with RANS in StarCCM+ and with Large Eddy Simulation (LES) in NekRS. Finally, preliminary simulations of the Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) lower plenum mixing facilities are presented. Initial work has developed models with LES, RANS, and porous media models. These preliminary models are presented and compared to each other to gauge differences in predictions with each of the three methods.
and Benchmarking (CMVB)↗