Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “anode-free manufacturing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Li Stripping Behavior of Anode‐Free Solid‐State Batteries Under Intermittent‐Current Discharge Conditions

Anode‐free manufacturing holds promise to enable high energy densities and lower Lithium (Li)‐metal solid‐state batteries (LMSSBs). Nevertheless, in contrast to thick Li foil (>50 µm), the stripping capacity of in situ‐formed Li (10–30 µm) is limited due to diminished creep flow, resulting in reduced accessible capacity. This study explores the correlation between stripping capacity and surface roughness of garnet Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) solid electrolyte. The results reveal that stripping capacity can be enhanced through the surface modification of solid electrolytes. Additionally, this study scrutinizes the stripping behavior of in situ Li under intermittent‐current discharge conditions, which are more relevant to the operational conditions of electric vehicles (EVs). It is demonstrated that, when compared to constant‐current stripping, intermittent‐current stripping effectively suppresses void formation and enhances the stripping capacity of in situ Li by 40%. It is considered that the intermittent current inhibits the accumulation of Li vacancies, thereby delaying the void formation. These findings provide valuable insights into the development of high‐performance anode‐free LMSSBs for EVs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Sulfide-Based Anode-Free Solid-State Batteries: Key Challenges and Emerging Solutions

Sulfide-based anode-free solid-state batteries (AFSSBs) have emerged as a transformative technology for next-generation energy storage, offering compelling advantages in energy density, safety, and manufacturing scalability. However, these batteries face significant challenges, particularly rapid capacity degradation that currently limits their practical implementation. This comprehensive review critically examines three fundamental issues affecting AFSSBs: nonuniform lithium nucleation on bare current collectors, unstable interfaces between plated lithium and sulfide electrolytes, and formation of interfacial voids during cycling. We systematically evaluate recent strategic advances in addressing these challenges, including metal seed coatings, conversion reaction-based compounds, and carbon-based interlayers. The review also analyzes the crucial role of advanced characterization techniques, from cryo-FIB-SEM to operando methods, in understanding failure mechanisms and validating improvement strategies. Finally, we present a forward-looking perspective on research directions necessary for commercialization. This work provides a thorough framework for understanding and advancing sulfide-based AFSSBs toward practical applications in next-generation energy storage systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Visualizing diverse lithium growth and stripping behaviors in anode-free solid-state batteries with operando X-ray tomography

Anode-free solid-state batteries (SSBs), which eliminate the need for lithium metal use during cell assembly, have the potential to enable high energy densities and simplified manufacturing. However, the factors that control lithium growth/stripping at the anode current collector are not well understood. Here, we use operando X-ray microcomputed tomography to comprehensively image and quantify lithium deposition and stripping under various conditions in three different Li|Li 6 PS 5 Cl|current collector cells, revealing diverse behavior that depends on interface morphology, cell resistance, and solid-state electrolyte (SSE) microstructure. A cell with high resistance exhibits extensive lithium filament growth across the entire current collector interface, with filaments that grow around pre-existing pores in the SSE rather than lithium filling these pores. Lithium filament formation is partially reversible, with the cracks shrinking as lithium metal is stripped. Uniform lithium deposition is achievable at low current densities in low-resistance cells, whereas higher current densities in these cells cause an increase in interfacial roughness, which is correlated with subsequent filamentary growth at the edges of the cell. These results provide insight into filamentary vs. planar lithium growth and highlight that the evolution of lithium is sensitively dependent on SSE microstructure and electrochemical processes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Non-fluorinated electrolyte for high-voltage anode-free sodium metal battery

Abundant sodium (Na) batteries are a sustainable alternative to resource-constrained lithium-ion batteries, offering huge cost advantages. However, developing high-voltage anode-free sodium metal batteries (SMBs) to narrow the energy density gap with lithium-ion batteries is hindered by a critical challenge: existing electrolytes cannot simultaneously achieve ultra-high Na coulombic efficiency and anodic stability. Here, in this study, we present a rationally designed non-fluorinated electrolyte (1.0 M NaPF 6 in 1,2-diethoxyethane/1,2-di-tert-butoxyethane) to address this key limitation, achieving Na coulombic efficiency of >99.95% and anodic stability of >4.8 V. For coin cells (2.0 mAh cm −2 , N/P = 1.7), our electrolyte design enables 4.0 V Na | |Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (NVP) at 5 C and 4.3 V Na | |NaNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC622) at 0.3 C for 5,000 and 500 cycles with a capacity retention >80%. Remarkably, the 50 mAh anode-free pouch cells 4.0 V Al | |NVP and 4.3 V Al | |NMC622 also achieve 500 and 300 cycles (retention >75%) with a specific energy of >360 Wh kg (electrode) −1 . This work focuses on electrolyte optimization and conceptual advances, whereas critical aspects such as safety, large-scale manufacturability and practical feasibility of SMBs require further investigation. The electrolyte design using non-fluorinated solvents enhances the anodic stability without sacrificing Na efficiency, laying groundwork for advancing low-cost, high-energy SMBs and supporting the transition to sustainable battery technologies.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Metallic Cu Surface Enables Reversible Na Metal Anodes and Stabilizes Anode-Free Sodium Metal Batteries

Anode free Na metal batteries are promising for future energy storage because they not only provide the highest energy densities but also eliminate the need of handling hazardous Na metals during battery manufacturing. However, they suffer from much faster degradation due to strong sensitivities even to trace levels of side reactions. In view of the crucial roles of surface chemistry on modulating electrochemical plating, this work systematically investigated a series of Cu surfaces for Na plating and stripping in the 1.0 M NaPF 6 diglyme electrolyte. Our results suggest that Na plating and stripping on pure Cu surface without Cu oxide species exhibits much better reversibility and smaller overpotentials across a wide range of current densities, especially for the first plating/stripping cycle. The high performance includes consistently higher than 99.8% Faradaic efficiencies, much more stable interfacial resistance, and negligible formation of mossy Na after 500 cycles. This improved performance can be explained based on the stronger Na-Cu affinity compared with the Na-CuO affinity. Anode-free Na metal batteries equipped with high-capacity sodium vanadium phosphate cathodes and pure Cu current collector exhibited at least 70% capacity retention for 100 cycles.

Electrochemistry↗

Impact of Salt Chemistry and Interlayer Architecture on Solid Electrolyte Interphase Composition and Performance

Reversible lithium metal anodes require interphases that are chemically stable, mechanically robust, and compatible with scalable processing. Here, we use slot-die-coated, salt-rich PEO interlayers to design SEI nanolayers on Cu current collectors and isolate how salt anion chemistry controls interphase composition and lithium plating/stripping behavior in architectures relevant to Li plating and anode-free cells. Mesoscale modeling shows that dendrite initiation at SEI defects is governed by a tradeoff among interphase thickness, ionic conductivity, and stiffness through defect-driven current focusing, motivating controlled formation from thin precursor layers. Using UHV-transferred XPS and ToF-SIMS depth profiling after controlled Li deposition, we find that fluorinated sulfonylimide salts (LiTFSI, LiFSI) form mixed inorganic/organic interphases containing LiF and PEO-derived alkoxides, with LiFSI producing a more LiF-dominant Li-facing surface than LiTFSI under identical conditions. In contrast, LiNO 3 -containing interlayers yield a comparatively thick nitrate-derived interphase that reduces upon Li contact to an N-rich inorganic layer (Li–N/N 3− , LiN x O y ). In Cu| |Li cells, these designed interlayers reduce interfacial resistance and improve Coulombic efficiency (CE) and critical current density (CCD) relative to uncoated controls, with LiFSI- and LiNO 3 -based interlayers providing the highest CE/CCD. Overall, the results demonstrate a manufacturing-relevant approach to engineer SEI nanolayers by salt chemistry, providing pathways to improve reversible lithium metal anodes while reducing reliance on LiTFSI.

anion chemistry↗