Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “composite solid electrolyte”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Self‐Templated 3D Sulfide‐Based Solid Composite Electrolyte for Solid‐State Sodium Metal Batteries

Abstract Rechargeable solid‐state sodium metal batteries (SSMBs) experience growing attention owing to the increased energy density (vs Na‐ion batteries) and cost‐effective materials. Inorganic sulfide‐based Na‐ion conductors also possess significant potential as promising solid electrolytes (SEs) in SSMBs. Nevertheless, due to the highly reactive Na metal, poor interface compatibility is the biggest obstacle for inorganic sulfide solid electrolytes such as Na 3 SbS 4 to achieve high performance in SSMBs. To address such electrochemical instability at the interface, new design of sulfide SE nanostructures and interface engineering are highly essential. In this work, a facile and straightforward approach is reported to prepare 3D sulfide‐based solid composite electrolytes (SCEs), which utilize porous Na 3 SbS 4 (NSS) as a self‐templated framework and fill with a phase transition polymer. The 3D structured SCEs display obviously improved interface stability toward Na metal than pristine sulfide. The assembled SSMBs (with TiS 2 or FeS 2 as cathodes) deliver outstanding electrochemical cycling performance. Moreover, the cycling of high‐voltage oxide cathode Na 0.67 Ni 0.33 Mn 0.67 O 2 (NNMO) is also demonstrated in SSMBs using 3D sulfide‐based SCEs. This study presents a novel design on the self‐templated nanostructure of SCEs, paving the way for the advancement of high‐energy sodium metal batteries.

Guo, Xiaolin↗
NASA NTRS1994

Composite Solid Electrolyte For Lithium Cells

Composite solid electrolyte material consists of very small particles, each coated with thin layer of Lil, bonded together with polymer electrolyte or other organic binder. Material offers significant advantages over other solid electrolytes in lithium cells and batteries. Features include high ionic conductivity and strength. Composite solid electrolyte expected to exhibit flexibility of polymeric electrolytes. Polymer in composite solid electrolyte serves two purposes: used as binder alone, conduction taking place only in AI2O3 particles coated with solid Lil; or used as both binder and polymeric electrolyte, providing ionic conductivity between solid particles that it binds together.

Peled, Emmanuel↗
DOE OSTI2020

A Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of Cation and Anion Dynamics in Polymer–Ceramic Composite Solid Electrolytes

Polymer–ceramic composite electrolytes are promising for the application of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries with high energy density and improved safety. In this work, we employ temperature-dependent 7 Li and 19 F NMR to examine the chemical environment and the dynamics of Li + cation and triflate anion in poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)–lithium triflate (LiTf) polymer electrolyte and a composite electrolyte containing 55 vol % doped lithium aluminum titanium phosphate (LICGC). The line shape analysis and spin–lattice relaxation (T 1 ) measurements suggest both the Li + cations and the Tf – anions reside in two distinct environment: a mobile environment and an immobile environment. In the semicrystalline state, a large ratio (>70%) of immobile Li + and Tf – is observed. In the melt state, the ratio of mobile cations and anions significantly increases. With the presence of LICGC ceramic, an increased ratio of immobile Li + and Tf – and reduced mobility of the mobile components are observed, indicating that the ceramic negatively impacts the transport of both the cations and the anions. NMR characterizations are corroborated by conductivity results, which reveal that the intrinsic ionic conductivity of the polymer phase of the composite electrolyte was only 0.15 of the ceramic-free polymer electrolyte at room temperature. These results shed light on the challenges inherent to composite electrolytes with the goal of achieving both enhanced Li + transference number and ionic conductivity.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS1994

Method for forming thin composite solid electrolyte film for lithium batteries

A composite solid electrolyte film is formed by dissolving a lithium salt such as lithium iodide in a mixture of a first solvent which is a co-solvent for the lithium salt and a binder polymer such as polyethylene oxide and a second solvent which is a solvent for the binder polymer and has poor solubility for the lithium salt. Reinforcing filler such as alumina particles are then added to form a suspension followed by the slow addition of binder polymer. The binder polymer does not agglomerate the alumina particles. The suspension is cast into a uniform film.

Nagasubramanian, Ganesan↗
NASA NTRS1997

Method for forming thin composite solid electrolyte film for lithium batteries

A composite solid electrolyte film is formed by dissolving a lithium salt such as lithium iodide in a mixture of a first solvent which is a cosolvent for the lithium salt and a binder polymer such as polyethylene oxide and a second solvent which is a solvent for the binder polymer and has poor solubility for the lithium salt. Reinforcing filler such as alumina particles are then added to form a suspension followed by the slow addition of binder polymer. The binder polymer does not agglomerate the alumina particles. The suspension is cast into a uniform film.

Nagasubramanian, Ganesan↗
DOE OSTI2020

Review—Polymer/Ceramic Interface Barriers: The Fundamental Challenge for Advancing Composite Solid Electrolytes for Li-Ion Batteries

Composite-solid electrolytes, in which ion-conducting polymers are combined with superionic ceramics, could revolutionize electrochemical-energy-storage devices enabling higher energy density, providing greater stability during operation and enhanced safety. However, the interfacial resistance between the ceramic and polymer phases strongly suppresses the ionic conductivity and presents the main obstacle to the use of these materials. Here, we emphasize the need for a distinct focus on reducing energy barriers to interfacial ion transport and improving the cation transference number. To achieve this goal, it is essential to develop a fundamental understanding of the parameters that influence the interfacial barriers to ion transport in composite electrolytes, and to understand the effect of the type of ceramic ("active" and "inert") and its content on ion-transport phenomena. We suggest that adapting the polymer chemistry, mainly directed on polymerized ionic liquids, (PolyILs), and combined with functionalization of the surface of ceramic nanoparticles is a promising route for overcoming the high-energy-barrier challenge. Owing to high content of ion-conducting ceramics and high t+ of PolyILs, the fractional contribution of the migrating cationic species to the total ionic conductivity of polymer-in-ceramic electrolytes via an interfacial percolation path, will be close to unity, thus eliminating complications that might arise from emerging concentration gradients during the operation of solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS2006

Composite Solid Electrolyte Containing Li+- Conducting Fibers

Improved composite solid polymer electrolytes (CSPEs) are being developed for use in lithium-ion power cells. The matrix components of these composites, like those of some prior CSPEs, are high-molecular-weight dielectric polymers [generally based on polyethylene oxide (PEO)]. The filler components of these composites are continuous, highly-Li(+)-conductive, inorganic fibers. PEO-based polymers alone would be suitable for use as solid electrolytes, were it not for the fact that their room-temperature Li(+)-ion conductivities lie in the range between 10(exp -6) and 10(exp -8) S/cm, too low for practical applications. In a prior approach to formulating a CSPE, one utilizes nonconductive nanoscale inorganic filler particles to increase the interfacial stability of the conductive phase. The filler particles also trap some electrolyte impurities. The achievable increase in conductivity is limited by the nonconductive nature of the filler particles.

Appleby, A. John↗
DOE OSTI2024

Flux Synthesis of A-site Disordered Perovskite La 0.5 M 0.5 TiO 3 (M$=$Li, Na, K) Nanorods Tailored for Solid Composite Electrolytes

Inorganic fillers play an important role in improving the ionic conductivity of solid composite electrolytes (SCEs) for Li-ion batteries. Among inorganic fillers, perovskite-type lithium lanthanum titanate (LLTO) stands out for its high bulk Li + conductivity on the order of 10 -3 S cm -1 at room temperature. According to a literature survey, the optimal LLTO filler should possess the following characteristics: i) a single-crystal structure to minimize grain boundaries; ii) a small particle size to increase the filler/polymer interface area; iii) a 1D morphology for efficient interface channels; and iv) cubic symmetry to facilitate rapid bulk Li + diffusion within the filler. However, the synthesis of single crystal, 1D LLTO nanomaterials with cubic symmetry is challenging. Herein, a flux strategy is developed to synthesize La 0.5 M 0.5 TiO 3 (LMTO, M$=$Li, Na, and K) single-crystal nanorods with an A-site-disordered, cubic perovskite phase. The flux media promotes the oriented growth of nanorods, prevents nanorods from sintering, and provides multiple alkali metal ion doping at M sites to stabilize the cubic phase. SCEs compositing the Li + -conducting LMTO nanorods as fillers and poly[vinylene carbonate- co -lithium sulfonyl(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide methacrylate] matrix exhibit more than twice the conductivity of the neat polymer electrolyte (30.6 vs 14.0 µS cm -1 at 303 K).

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
NASA NTRS1993

Composite Solid Electrolyte for Li Battery Applications

The electrochemical, bulk and interfacial properties of the polyethylene oxide (PEO) based composite solid electrolyte (CSE) comprising LiI, PEO, and Al2O3 have been evaluated for Li battery applications. The bulk interfacial and transport properties of the CSEs seem to strongly depend on the alumina particle size. For the CSE films with 0.05 micron alumina while the bulk conductivity is around 10(exp -4) (mho/cm) at 103 C, the Li ion transport number seems to be close to unity at the same temperature. Compared to the PEO electrolyte this polymer composite electrolyte seems to exhibit robust mechanical and interfacial properties. We have studied three different films with three different alumina sizes in the range 0.01-0.3 micron. Effects of Al2O3 particle size on the electrochemical performance of polymer composite electrolyte is discussed. With TiS2 as cathode a 10 mAh small capacity cell was charged and discharged at C/40 and C/20 rates respectively.

Nagasubramanian, G.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Solvent-Mediated Synthesis of Amorphous Li 3 PS 4 /Polyethylene Oxide Composite Solid Electrolytes with High Li + Conductivity

Solvent-mediated routes have emerged as an effective, scalable, and low-temperature method to fabricate sulfide-based solid-state electrolytes. However, tuning the synthesis conditions to optimize the electrolyte’s morphology, structure, and electrochemical properties is still underexplored. Here, we report a new class of composite solid electrolytes (SEs) containing amorphous Li 3 PS 4 synthesized in situ with a poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) binder using a one-pot, solvent-mediated route. The solvent and thermal processing conditions have a dramatic impact on the Li 3 PS 4 structure. Conducting the synthesis in tetrahydrofuran resulted in crystalline β-Li 3 PS 4 whereas acetonitrile led to amorphous Li 3 PS 4 . Annealing at 140 °C increased the Li + conductivity of an amorphous composite (Li 3 PS 4 + 1 wt % PEO) by 3 orders of magnitude (e.g., from 4.5 × 10 –9 to 8.4 × 10 –6 S/cm at room temperature) because of: (i) removal of coordinated solvent and (ii) rearrangement of the polyanionic network to form P 2 S 7 4– and PS 4 3– moieties. The PEO content in these composites should be limited to 1–5 wt % to ensure reasonable Li+ conductivity (e.g., up to 1.1 × 10 –4 S/cm at 80 °C) while providing enough binder to facilitate scalable processing. Here, the results of this study highlight a new strategy to suppress crystallization in sulfide-based SEs, which has important implications for solid-state batteries.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2021

A stable cathode-solid electrolyte composite for high-voltage, long-cycle-life solid-state sodium-ion batteries

Rechargeable solid-state sodium-ion batteries (SSSBs) hold great promise for safer and more energy-dense energy storage. However, the poor electrochemical stability between current sulfide-based solid electrolytes and high-voltage oxide cathodes has limited their long-term cycling performance and practicality. Here, we report the discovery of the ion conductor Na 3-x Y 1-x Zr x Cl 6 (NYZC) that is both electrochemically stable (up to 3.8 V vs. Na/Na + ) and chemically compatible with oxide cathodes. Its high ionic conductivity of 6.6 × 10 –5 S cm –1 at ambient temperature, several orders of magnitude higher than oxide coatings, is attributed to abundant Na vacancies and cooperative MCl 6 rotation, resulting in an extremely low interfacial impedance. A SSSB comprising a NaCrO 2 + NYZC composite cathode, Na 3 PS 4 electrolyte, and Na-Sn anode exhibits an exceptional first-cycle Coulombic efficiency of 97.1% at room emperature and can cycle over 1000 cycles with 89.3% capacity retention at 40 °C. These findings highlight the immense potential of halides for SSSB applications.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Structural effects of composition tuning in A-site disordered perovskite La0.5Li0.5−xMxTiO3 (M = Na, K) nanorods for fast interfacial transport for solid composite electrolyte design

Polymer-ceramic composite electrolytes (CPE) have emerged as promising replacements for currently used liquid organic electrolytes, which pose as safety hazards, in Li-ion batteries. Limits in conductivity enhancement in CPEs is often attributed to a high resistance for Li-ion transport along the interface due to the incompatibility of the polymer and ceramic phases. A clear understanding of the interfacial structure and how this impacts interfacial Li-ion transport is needed in order to efficiently design a CPE with optimal ionic conductivity. In this study, density functional theory (DFT) calculations, in conjunction with scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), are used to unveil the bulk and surface structure of La0.5Li0.5−xMxTiO3 (M = Na, K) (LMTO) nanorods, a newly-reported ceramic system with promising applications in CPEs, and the LMTO interactions with the poly(lithium sulfonyl (trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide methacrylate) (p(MTFSILi)) polymerized ionic liquid. Substitution of lithium for sodium and potassium onto the A-site perovskite lattice is shown to increase the stability of the preferred pseudocubic perovskite phase because of their increased cation size which allows them to reduce the TiO6 octahedral rotations in the bulk and at the surface. STEM and EELS results show that LMTO nanorods with differing compositions have Ti-enriched (110)-oriented surfaces. Increased sodium and potassium compositions in LMTO is also shown using the DFT calculations to weaken the binding of the lithium atom to the MTFSI unit when LiMTFSI is adsorbed to the LMTO surface. This weakening of lithium binding to the polymer at the LMTO interface indicates that the lithium mobility is increased, correlating to an increase in interfacial Li-ion transport. Overall, this work provides insights into how to tune the interfacial interactions between the polymer (p(MTFSI)) and ceramic (LMTO) for optimal CPE design.

Shepard, Lauren B [Pennsylvania State University, ↗
DOE OSTI2022

Transport and mechanical behavior in PEO-LLZO composite electrolytes

Abstract Composite solid electrolytes (CEs), wherein ion-conducting polymer and ceramic/glass is mixed, are promising candidates for all-solid-state batteries due to their promise of acceptable ionic conductivity and mechanical properties compared to their individual constituents. While numerous studies have focused on improving the performance of CEs, it is still unclear what the material targets are that can result in improved macroscopic performance especially in light of the coupled needs for high transport and high mechanical strength in these materials. In this study, a two-dimensional (2D) mathematical model is developed to investigate electrochemical and mechanical characteristics of CEs. The model is compared to CEs consisting of poly-ethylene-oxide (PEO) polymer and lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO) ceramic material with examination of the impact of varying LLZO volume fractions. The potential drop at the PEO-LLZO interface is evaluated using the junction potential theory. Using experimental data from the literature, the model estimates the ionic conductivity, effective transference number, and mechanical stiffness of the CEs. While the mechanical stiffness improves with increasing volume fraction of LLZO, the impact on conductivity and transference number depends on interfacial resistance at the interface. Finally, the study reports CE’s potential to enhance Li-ion transport and mechanical properties to inhibit lithium (Li) dendrite growth.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Process for fabrication of enhanced β″-alumina solid electrolytes for energy storage devices and energy applications

A dense β″-alumina/zirconia composite solid electrolyte and process for fabrication are disclosed. The process allows fabrication at temperatures at or below 1600° C. The solid electrolytes include a dense composite matrix of β″-alumina and zirconia, and one or more transition metal oxides that aid the conversion and densification of precursor salts during sintering. The composite solid electrolytes find application in sodium energy storage devices and power-grid systems and devices for energy applications.

Lu, Xiaochuan↗
DOE OSTI2022

Hydrogen bonds enhanced composite polymer electrolyte for high-voltage cathode of solid-state lithium battery

Polymer electrolyte is one of the important components for developing advanced solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs). However, the narrow electrochemical stability window restricts the practical application with high-voltage cathodes. In this study, a series of composite solid electrolytes (CSEs), possessing both wide electrochemical stability window (up to 5.0 V vs. Li + /Li) and high ionic conductivity (over 1.35×10 -3 S/cm at 25 °C), were reported by integrating SiO 2 nanoparticles into poly(vinyl ethylene carbonate) polymer electrolyte. The enhanced anti-oxidation performances are mainly caused and confirmed by the local intermolecular interactions of hydrogen bonds in CSE. Based on this CSE, the SSLBs with LiCoO 2 cathode present good cycle stability at high voltage, and the capacity retention with 4.5 V cut-off voltage is about 94% after 200 cycles. This work not only proves the importance of intermolecular interactions in CSE, but also provides an effective method for achieving high-energy SSLBs with enhanced interface compatibility between polymer electrolyte and highvoltage cathodes

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Solid-state prealkylation of electrode architectures to tune solid electrolyte interphase composition

Efficient electrochemical cycling of certain Si anodes is limited by irreversible Li consumption to form and continually reform the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) due to Si expansion/contraction and fracture. Prelithiation can compensate for these losses; however, the starting open circuit potential (VOC) becomes highly reducing and, therefore, the electrolyte reduction chemistry that influences the SEI composition can change. Herein, we compare SEI formation for electrodes prelithiated using Solid State Prealkylation of Electrode Architectures (SPEAR) versus traditional electrochemically lithiated architectures (ECLAR), focusing on SEI compositional changes as a function of stoichiometry (0.28 ≤ x ≤ 1.38 in LixSi). Increasing SPEAR prelithiation decreased the initial VOC of Si anodes vs. Li/Li+ from ∼3 V (Li0.28Si) to < 0.5 V for Li1.38Si, enabling simultaneous competitive reduction of EC, EMC, and LiPF6 at low potentials. Ex situ7Li and 29Si cross-polarization NMR and XPS reveal that SPEAR drives thicker SEI formation with substantially increased P/F contributions and a predominantly inorganic insoluble SEI (71.4% inorganic for Li1.38Si), consistent with accelerated LiPF6-derived POx/LiPFx/LiF formation relative to ECLAR analogs which exhibit carbonate-rich organic SEI compositions. Symmetric-cell EIS further indicates SPEAR-specific impedance features consistent with pore reduction (filling) during LixSi formation. In full cells, SPEAR prelithiation increases the initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) and accelerates SEI formation and stabilization with Li1.38Si reaching 99.4% coulombic efficiency (CE) by cycle 2.

Musgrove, Amanda [ORNL] (ORCID:0009000220910389)↗