Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “fuel and material qualification”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Accelerating Nuclear Fuels and Materials Qualification by Multi-Level Irradiation Experiment Campaign

The advanced reactor technologies feature fuels, coolants, and materials that promise safer operating conditions under normal and accident scenarios. However, the nuclear fuels and materials qualifications require several decades (for example, new reactor fuel qualification from conceptualization requires about 20 years). Therefore, accelerating nuclear fuels and materials qualification is essential, and it can be achieved by combining high through-put materials irradiation and testing, advanced post-irradiation examinations, and Multiphysics modeling. This paper addressed the associated challenges in accelerating nuclear fuels and material qualification for new and advanced reactor designs, which differ based on fuel, coolant, operating conditions, and structural materials. These challenges vary for radiation level, operating conditions (e.g., temperature and pressure), and coolant type (e.g., corrosion environment). In addition, the challenges and limitations in modeling tools, experimental facilities, and licensing guidelines are also discussed, and a general solution path forward is recommended.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Presentation: Accelerating Nuclear Fuels and Materials Qualification by Multi-Level Irradiation Experiment Campaign

The advanced reactor technologies feature fuels, coolants, and materials that promise safer operating conditions under normal and accident scenarios. However, the nuclear fuels and materials qualifications require several decades (for example, new reactor fuel qualification from conceptualization requires about 20 years). Therefore, accelerating nuclear fuels and materials qualification is essential, and it can be achieved by combining high through-put materials irradiation and testing, advanced post-irradiation examinations, and Multiphysics modeling. This paper addressed the associated challenges in accelerating nuclear fuels and material qualification for new and advanced reactor designs, which differ based on fuel, coolant, operating conditions, and structural materials. These challenges vary for radiation level, operating conditions (e.g., temperature and pressure), and coolant type (e.g., corrosion environment). In addition, the challenges and limitations in modeling tools, experimental facilities, and licensing guidelines are also discussed, and a general solution path forward is recommended.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Accelerating Nuclear Fuels and Materials Qualification-Learning from MeV Summer School 2022

This presentation focused on the general overview of the lecture content that related to nuclear fuels and material qualification. The content of this presentation is taken from the lecture notes of MeV Summer School 2022. The sources are cited as per lecture notes. The focus of this presentation is to review the learning from the Modeling, Experiment, and Validation (MeV) Summer School (July 18-29, 2022) for early career researchers and scientists. This year's school was hosted by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and was focused on Accelerating nuclear fuels, and materials qualification by combining high through-put materials irradiation and testing, advanced PIE, and Multiphysics modeling.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Accelerated Irradiation Testing and Post-Irradiation Characterization: U.S.-Based Capabilities for Advanced Nuclear Systems and Radioisotope Production

Irradiation experiments and post-irradiation examinations, together referred to as irradiation testing (IRT), are prerequisites for nuclear fuel and material qualification for the deployment of new and advanced reactors, as well as radioisotope production, thereby ensuring regulatory compliance. Qualified research and test reactors (RTRs) and testing facilities are essential to enable IRT to verify performance and safety under prototypical reactor conditions. In the past, qualification of new fuels or structural materials required about 20 years. Synergist strategies, advanced tools, and qualified methods are needed to greatly reduce this timeframe of IRT and radioisotope production. This study, termed accelerated-IRT, focuses on identifying gaps and leveraging U.S.-based RTRs and material testing capabilities, leveraging the preliminary evaluation and qualification of selected RTRs to provide a generic as well as specific-case solution paths forward, ensuring adherence to stringent regulatory standards. Furthermore, IRT and radioisotope production utilizing qualified RTRs necessarily includes modeling and simulation to support the design (i.e. neutronics, thermal, and structural aspects) and manufacturing of irradiation test specimens, vehicles, capsules, apparatuses, and flow loops. In addition, IRT can be improved by applying advanced manufacturing techniques and in-pile sensors and instrumentation, as discussed in this study.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

U-10Mo Monolithic Fuel Qualification Plan

The Material Management and Minimization (M3) Program’s primary objective within the U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration is to achieve permanent threat reduction by minimizing and when possible, eliminating weapon-usable nuclear material around the world. Under M3’s Office of Conversion, the U.S. High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) Project, is pursuing a fuel qualification and licensing effort focused on converting high-performance research reactors in the United States from using highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to using low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The body of this document is focused on defining the activities required for generic qualification of high density, LEU fuel that then allows reactor conversions to proceed for the four high-performance research reactors and the critical assembly that will operate using the U-10Mo monolithic fuel design (see Subsection 1.3): MITR, MURR, NBSR, ATR, and ATRC. Fuel qualification in this report means generic fuel acceptance of the U-10Mo monolithic fuel form by the NRC for use in reactor conversions in the United States, which allows the fuel to be used in subsequent reactor specific licensing requests. The U 10Mo Monolithic Fuel Research, Development, and Qualification Plan utilizes the functions and requirements of the USHPRR Project that was established in the Functions and Requirements Document (F&RD) [1] and expands on these requirements to ensure that planned tests have traceable results that will ensure the requirement has been met. The methods by which data will be collected to show that these requirements have been met are described in this document.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

In-situ thermomechanical measurements during burst testing of Zr claddings using digital image correlation and infrared thermography techniques

Burst testing has long been a relied-on method for assessing fuel cladding materials in light-water reactoraccident scenarios. However, burst testing historically provided minimal in-situ observations beyond a few thermocouple readings, pressure from transducers, and post-test deformation measurements. Acquisition of full cladding thermomechanical data throughout a burst test would be invaluable to fuel system qualification, material model development and fuel performance code validation, such as the BISON fuel performance code. Recently, methodologies for simultaneously applying 2-dimensional digital image correlation and infrared thermography techniques to quantify the relationship between temperature, internal cladding pressure, and deformation during burst testing were developed. This work details results from the application of these techniques to burst testing of Zircaloy-4 cladding segments subjected to loss-of-coolant accident transients in an air environment. Two types of tests were performed with: (a) cladding segments connected to a fixed pressure reservoir as well as (b) closed systems where internal pressure increased during transients. In-situ thermomechanical measurements including strain and thermal gradient data are presented, demonstrating the effectiveness of applying combined surface measurement techniques to burst testing

Bell, Sam↗

An Evaluation and Qualification of U.S.-Based Research Reactors for Irradiation Capabilities Supporting Advanced Nuclear Systems

Irradiation experiments are a prerequisite for evaluating nuclear reactor system designs, analyzing the performance of these systems, and obtaining licenses. Likewise, irradiation facilities are necessary for producing the radioisotopes used in industrial and medical applications. Recent developments in modeling and simulation capabilities and advancements in computational resources have further enabled the design of irradiation experiments for evaluating radiation-induced phenomena and determining nuclear fuel, material, and system design and safety criteria pertaining to both normal and accident scenarios. These computational tools and models require comprehensive experimental datasets acquired under prototypic radiation conditions—for exploring material and system performance under the uniquely harsh environments found in nuclear reactors—to enable verification and validation for qualification and licensing purposes. However, qualification of irradiation experimental facilities, primarily research and test reactors (RTRs), necessitates that their performance be evaluated based on the irradiation environment (e.g. flux, power, testing capabilities) using an appropriate scoring matrix. Although many university campus RTRs are available for research and development (R&D) activities and initiatives, this study focuses on evaluating and qualifying the irradiation facilities (mostly RTRs) within the United States that are suitable for advanced nuclear fuel, material, and system irradiation experiments aimed at establishing operational-performance limits and informing component and fuel designs so as to improve operational efficiencies and mitigate proliferation vulnerabilities, as well as for radioisotope production aimed at multipurpose applications. As a result, the findings of the present study support the acceleration of nuclear fuel and material qualifications, thus hastening new and advanced nuclear energy system demonstrations and radioisotope production efforts by using extended R&D.

irradiation experiment↗

Design and Fabrication of a Temperature-Controlled Fueled Molten Salt Capsule Irradiation Experiment

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is developing a Molten salt Research Temperature-controlled Irradiation (MRTI) experimental capsule for the Neutron Radiography (NRAD) reactor. The experiment is envisaged to be versatile and able to host a variety of salt-wall material combinations. The first test is designed to contain actinide-bearing chloride salt, which previously has not been subjected to a neutron field. The main objectives of the experiment are to produce irradiated salt samples for Post Irradiation Examination (PIE), to evaluate salt behavior under irradiation, and to test in-situ sensors/instrumentation. The final design for the experiment completed in 2022, and fabrication of the experiment is underway. The salt is double encapsulated providing insulation and redundancy in the case of leakage. A gas-gap between the inner capsule and the outer container enables tuning of thermal conduction to the NRAD coolant by altering its thickness and its gas-mixture. An inert gas mixture ratio in the gas-gap ensures the configurations reached a targeted average salt temperature of 600oC, while avoiding salt freezing or exceeding material limits. A resistive heater placed within a thermowell and controls the temperature of the experiment (both when the reactor is on or off). The selected configurations can contain over 10 cm3 of fuel-bearing chloride salt, which is sufficient for the purposes of the post-irradiation examination (PIE) and provides sufficient volume for two submerged thermocouple probes to monitor salt temperature. The capsule wall material is Inconel 625, and weld qualifications for the assembly have been developed. A glove-box laser weld technique was refined as part of this process to ensure a leak-tight assembly for the salt-bearing assembly and reduce the risks of impurities permeating into the salt. This work was supported through the INL Laboratory Directed Research & Development (LDRD) Program under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ENYGF 2023 - Design of Temperature-controlled Fuel-salt Irradiation Experiment

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is developing a Molten salt Research Temperature-controlled Irradiation (MRTI) experimental capsule for the Neutron Radiography (NRAD) reactor. The experiment is envisaged to be versatile and able to host a variety of salt-wall material combinations. The first test is designed to contain actinide-bearing chloride salt, which previously has not been subjected to a neutron field. The main objectives of the experiment are to produce irradiated salt samples for Post Irradiation Examination (PIE), to evaluate salt behavior under irradiation, and to test in-situ sensors/instrumentation. The final design for the experiment completed in 2022, and fabrication of the experiment is underway. The salt is double encapsulated providing insulation and redundancy in the case of leakage. A gas-gap between the inner capsule and the outer container enables tuning of thermal conduction to the NRAD coolant by altering its thickness and its gas-mixture. An inert gas mixture ratio in the gas-gap ensures the configurations reached a targeted average salt temperature of 600oC, while avoiding salt freezing or exceeding material limits. A resistive heater placed within a thermowell and controls the temperature of the experiment (both when the reactor is on or off). The selected configurations can contain over 10 cm3 of fuel-bearing chloride salt, which is sufficient for the purposes of the post-irradiation examination (PIE) and provides sufficient volume for two submerged thermocouple probes to monitor salt temperature. The capsule wall material is Inconel 625, and weld qualifications for the assembly have been developed. A glove-box laser weld technique was refined as part of this process to ensure a leak-tight assembly for the salt-bearing assembly and reduce the risks of impurities permeating into the salt. This work was supported through the INL Laboratory Directed Research & Development (LDRD) Program under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

MOOSE ProbML: Parallelizable Probabilistic Machine Learning and Uncertainty Quantification Capabilities

The Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) is a widely used open- source finite element software for performing multiphysics multiscale simulations in a massively parallel fashion. Recently, the computational team at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has implemented Probabilistic Machine Learning (ProbML) capabilities in MOOSE—in a parallelized fashion—and enable active learning with large-scale computational models for tasks such as surrogate model development, scale bridging, forward/inverse uncertainty quantification (UQ), Bayesian optimization, etc. This presentation summarizes these developments in MOOSE along with demonstrations on several real applications relevant to nuclear energy. At the fundamental level, samplers like Monte Carlo/Latin Hypercube, variance reduction, parallelized Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) support uncertainty propagation in both forward and inverse settings. These samplers can be integrated with the Gaussian processes (GP) suite in MOOSE, which offer several variants like scalar GPs, multi-output GPs, and deep GPs, to enable active learning. These GPs can be tuned using gradient-based optimization methods like Adam and its variants or gradient-free methods like the elliptical slice sampler (a variant of MCMC adept under Gaussian settings) for more complex covariance kernels or likelihoods whose gradient computations can be cumbersome. A variety of batch acquisition functions permit parallelized evaluation of the computational model and support different learning objectives with high efficiency like Bayesian inference, global surrogate development, optimization, etc. Furthermore, libtorch integration supports training, evaluation, and re-training of neural networks and other complex machine learning models in active learning settings. The impacts of these developments are shown on several real applications: (1) nuclear fuel inverse UQ and model inadequacy assessment using the Kennedy O’Hagan framework; (2) uncertainty aware surrogate modeling for additive manufacturing to predict field quantities; (3) nuclear reactor rare events analysis; and (4) complex fluid flow prediction using a global surrogate with quantified prediction uncertainty. Finally, the outlook of MOOSE ProbML is discussed for both outer-loop and inner-loop computations in the broad view to accelerate fuels and materials qualification, address gaps in knowledge and data, and assess new reactor/fuel systems.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Retractable Sensors for In-Core Use in Material Test Reactors - conf paper

Material Test Reactors (MTRs) such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) are used to irradiate nuclear fuels and materials to evaluate their performance after high levels of exposure to a reactor in-core environment. The most critical tests are equipped with instrumentation leads, which allow real-time data collection. However, because of the very harsh environment inside high-power MTR experiments, there are very few sensors that can survive and maintain their calibrated readings for the time periods required to obtain the high neutron doses needed for new fuels and materials qualification. As a result, sometimes sponsoring programs are forced to accept low reliability of sensors, collecting useful data for only part of the experiment duration. The work described herein is based on the observation that MTRs normally run at constant power and the corresponding conditions within reactor experiments typically evolve relatively slowly. Therefore, even one or two measurements per day would provide a complete and representative data set. With this in mind, INL has embarked on a program to develop a mechanism capable of pushing a very small-diameter sensor (typically a thermocouple or optical fiber) into the location to be measured, leave the sensor for roughly 60 seconds to allow it to reach equilibrium and transmit the signal, then pull it up and away from the high neutron flux and high-temperature region. Small-diameter capillary tubes, up to 8 m long, are used to guide the sensors to the appropriate locations. These capillary tubes serve as essentially very deep, thin-walled thermowells. The distance a thermocouple or optical fiber would need to traverse is on the order of 40 - 80 cm. By adopting this infrequent cycling strategy, the thermocouple or optical fiber would spend only a few hours in the high-neutron flux/high-temperature environment over the duration of even the longest irradiation experiment. To date, INL has developed two styles of drive mechanisms. The first is based on friction drive wheels which drive the sensors in a manner similar to a small MIG welder. This has the advantage of being able to accommodate a very long insertion length. The second is based on a ball screw drive and has the advantages of positive attachment and being able to move more than one sensor at a time. Both drive mechanisms have been fabricated and tested in a laboratory setting. Both systems can handle hard mineral insulated cable (such as thermocouples) or optical fibers encased in small diameter tube. The sizes tested to date are 1 - 1.6 mm diameter. Work in this area is ongoing with an eye toward demonstration in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's MITR reactor, followed by deployment in an ATR irradiation experiment.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Retractable Sensors for In-Core Service in Material Test Reactors

Material Test Reactors (MTRs) such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) are used to irradiate nuclear fuels and materials to evaluate their performance after high levels of exposure to a reactor in-core environment. The most critical tests are equipped with instrumentation leads, which allow real-time data collection. However, because of the very harsh environment inside high-power MTR experiments, there are very few sensors that can survive and maintain their calibrated readings for the time periods required to obtain the high neutron doses needed for new fuels and materials qualification. As a result, sometimes sponsoring programs are forced to accept low reliability of sensors, collecting useful data for only part of the experiment duration. The work described herein is based on the observation that MTRs normally run at constant power and the corresponding conditions within reactor experiments typically evolve relatively slowly. Therefore, even one or two measurements per day would provide a complete and representative data set. With this in mind, INL has embarked on a program to develop a mechanism capable of pushing a very small-diameter sensor (typically a thermocouple or optical fiber) into the location to be measured, leave the sensor for roughly 60 seconds to allow it to reach equilibrium and transmit the signal, then pull it up and away from the high neutron flux and high-temperature region. Small-diameter capillary tubes, up to 8 m long, are used to guide the sensors to the appropriate locations. These capillary tubes serve as essentially very deep, thin-walled thermowells. The distance a thermocouple or optical fiber would need to traverse is on the order of 40 - 80 cm. By adopting this infrequent cycling strategy, the thermocouple or optical fiber would spend only a few hours in the high-neutron flux/high-temperature environment over the duration of even the longest irradiation experiment. To date, INL has developed two styles of drive mechanisms. The first is based on counter-rotating wheels which drive the sensors in a manner similar to a small MIG welder. This has the advantage of being able to accommodate a very long insertion length. The second is based on a ball screw drive and has the advantages of positive attachment and being able to move more than one sensor at a time. Both drive mechanisms have been fabricated and tested in a laboratory setting. Both systems can handle hard mineral insulated cable (such as thermocouples) or optical fibers encased in small diameter tube. The sizes tested to date are 1 - 1.6 mm diameter. Work in this area is ongoing with an eye toward demonstration in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's MITR reactor, followed by deployment in an ATR irradiation experiment.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Retractable Sensors for In-Core Service in Material Test Reactors

Material Test Reactors (MTRs) such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) are used to irradiate nuclear fuels and materials to evaluate their performance after high levels of exposure to a reactor in-core environment. The most critical tests are equipped with instrumentation leads, which allow real-time data collection. However, because of the very harsh environment inside high-power MTR experiments, there are very few sensors that can survive and maintain their calibrated readings for the time periods required to obtain the high neutron doses needed for new fuels and materials qualification. As a result, sometimes sponsoring programs are forced to accept low reliability of sensors, collecting useful data for only part of the experiment duration. The work described herein is based on the observation that MTRs normally run at constant power and the corresponding conditions within reactor experiments typically evolve relatively slowly. Therefore, even one or two measurements per day would provide a complete and representative data set. With this in mind, INL has embarked on a program to develop a mechanism capable of pushing a very small-diameter sensor (typically a thermocouple or optical fiber) into the location to be measured, leave the sensor for roughly 60 seconds to allow it to reach equilibrium and transmit the signal, then pull it up and away from the high neutron flux and high-temperature region. Small-diameter capillary tubes, up to 8 m long, are used to guide the sensors to the appropriate locations. These capillary tubes serve as essentially very deep, thin-walled thermowells. The distance a thermocouple or optical fiber would need to traverse is on the order of 40 – 80 cm. By adopting this infrequent cycling strategy, the thermocouple or optical fiber would spend only a few hours in the high-neutron flux/high-temperature environment over the duration of even the longest irradiation experiment. To date, INL has developed two styles of drive mechanisms. The first is based on counter-rotating wheels which drive the sensors in a manner similar to a small MIG welder. This has the advantage of being able to accommodate a very long insertion length. The second is based on a ball screw drive and has the advantages of positive attachment and being able to move more than one sensor at a time. Both drive mechanisms have been fabricated and tested in a laboratory setting. Both systems can handle hard mineral insulated cable (such as thermocouples) or optical fibers encased in small diameter tube. The sizes tested to date are 1 – 1.6 mm diameter. Work in this area is ongoing with an eye toward demonstration in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s MITR reactor, followed by deployment in an ATR irradiation experiment.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

A review of neutronics and thermal hydraulics–based screening methods applied to accelerated nuclear fuel qualification

This paper reviews the state-of-the-art engineering approach for using thermal hydraulic (TH) and neutronics modeling and simulation (M&S) tools to perform rapid screening studies of novel nuclear fuel concepts within the context of accelerated fuel qualification. Global research efforts have introduced nuclear fuel and material concepts that mark a significant departure from traditional reactor materials. The number of new technologies being considered for development for light water reactors and advanced reactor types has created the need for an accelerated fuel qualification procedure. A key component of this procedure is the rapid identification of the most promising fuel concepts using computational screening studies. Advanced TH and neutronic M&S tools should be leveraged to efficiently determine whether the reactor performance and safety characteristics of a given concept warrant additional studies or whether the concept requires modification or elimination. This paper reviews best practices for performing these TH and neutronics screening studies at various stages during a fuel concept's progression through the qualification procedure. The motivation behind standardizing this approach is to minimize time and resources spent on qualification activities for fuel concepts that could be quickly refined or eliminated from consideration based on their reactor physics and TH characteristics. Adoption of this screening procedure—which focuses primarily on nuclear fuels but may be applicable to other reactor materials—will also help accelerate new material qualification by generating boundary conditions crucial to fuel performance evaluations and highlighting needed areas of separate effects experimentation. This article reviews the motivation behind the introduction of novel nuclear fuel concepts, provides incentive for utilizing TH- and neutronics-based screening studies, describes the screening approach and methodology, and includes discussion on how to interpret screening results to provide recommendations for the continued development of a given concept.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Advances in Metallic Fuel Database Development and Data Qualification

The Fuels Irradiation and Physics Database (FIPD [1]) is a comprehensive repository of data and documents related to Uranium-Zirconium based metallic fuel test pins. This database stores operational conditions of these pins, calculated using a suite of Argonne National Laboratory analysis codes developed during the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) program. Key calculated data include axial distributions of power, temperature, fluence, burnup, and isotopic densities. Additionally, the FIPD holds post-irradiation examination (PIE) data such as fission gas release, gas chemistry measurements, and axial distributions derived from profilometry, gamma scanning, and neutron radiography. Complementing these data is an extensive archive of documents related to various pins and experiments. These include raw PIE records, design details, safety analyses, and operational reports. More detail about FIPD can be found in ref. [2]. The database development is an ongoing effort covering metallic fuel experiments from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) and the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). The recent improvements to the database and the data QA status are summarized in this paper.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Prospects for additive manufacturing of nuclear fuel forms

Additive manufacturing (AM) is viewed as a critical enabling technology for achieving superior performance and improved economics across many sectors. Although the past decade has seen increased application of AM methods to nuclear reactor cladding and structural materials, exploration of AM as applied to the uranium-bearing nuclear fuel forms has been limited. The two major families of nuclear fuel forms (monolithic, particle/dispersion) are utilized with their own set of core objectives in mind, and their differences require distinct fabrication infrastructures. These reference fabrication methods impose many limitations on nuclear fuels. Further, both currently operating reactors and future concepts have the potential for improved performance if these accepted limitations are relaxed or removed entirely. The primary limitations of reference fabrication processes for the common nuclear fuel forms are outlined in this paper. This groundwork is then used to identify avenues of fuel performance specific to each of these fuel architectures that could be exploited if the restrictions of conventional fuel fabrication are removed. Moreover, multiple targets for AM studies are laid out for each of the major nuclear fuel variants. Finally, key strategic components to guide research activities in AM of nuclear fuels are outlined, with an emphasis on use of modeling and simulation to motivate research aims and embrace of an accelerated testing methodology to screen and quality new fuel forms.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Transport Modeling of As-Run ATR Cycles to Support U-10Mo Research Reactor Fuel Qualification Experiment

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Materials Management and Minimization has been tasked with converting the five remaining United States High Performance Research Reactors (U.S. HPRR) from highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR), Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR), and National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR); and DOE regulates the High Flux Isotope Reactor and Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). To meet the high demands of these reactors, the U.S. HPRR program has chosen to use 90% uranium - 10% molybdenum (U-10Mo) monolithic fuel. This plate-type fuel will undergo multiple irradiation experiment campaigns in ATR, from mini-plates to full element tests, over a large range of operating conditions. This will provide data in support of the fuel qualification of each reactor. This summary focuses on the as-run neutronic analysis of the first series of mini-plate (MP-1) experiments, which have been irradiated in the ATR. MP-1 experiment’s main goal is to demonstrate the fabrication process and meet the fuel irradiation performance requirements with primary focus on the fuel plates associated with the three NRC reactors, with a small focus on the low power requirements of the ATR fuel. The MP-1 experiments are planned to be the basis of the monolithic U-10Mo fuel for qualification through the NRC.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Transport Modeling of As-Run ATR Cycles for U-10Mo Fuel Qualification Experiment

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Materials Management and Minimization has been tasked with converting the five remaining United States High Performance Research Reactors (U.S. HPRR) from highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR), Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR), and National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR); and DOE regulates the High Flux Isotope Reactor and Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). To meet the high demands of these reactors, the U.S. HPRR program has chosen to use 90% uranium - 10% molybdenum (U-10Mo) monolithic fuel. This plate-type fuel will undergo multiple irradiation experiment campaigns in ATR, from mini-plates to full element tests, over a large range of operating conditions. This will provide data in support of the fuel qualification of each reactor. This summary focuses on the as-run neutronic analysis of the first series of mini-plate (MP-1) experiments, which have been irradiated in the ATR. MP-1 experiment’s main goal is to demonstrate the fabrication process and meet the fuel irradiation performance requirements with primary focus on the fuel plates associated with the three NRC reactors, with a small focus on the low power requirements of the ATR fuel. The MP-1 experiments are planned to be the basis of the monolithic U-10Mo fuel for qualification through the NRC.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗