Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “isothermal annealing experiments”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Development of a grain growth model for U 3 Si 2 using experimental data, phase field simulation and molecular dynamics

The purpose of this work is to develop a model for normal grain growth in U 3 Si 2 . The average grain boundary energy was determined from previously published molecular dynamics simulations. The grain growth kinetics were quantified at various temperatures by annealing nanocrystalline samples. Here, the mobility was determined by comparing phase field grain growth simulations to the experimental data.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Evaluation of Sb-Nd and Te-Nd phases within the U-Zr fuel matrix and their interactions with HT9 alloy

Antimony (Sb) and tellurium (Te) were investigated as potential additives for U-10Zr (wt.%) metallic fuel to limit the fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) with HT-9 alloy. Neodymium (Nd) was utilized to simulate the formation of lanthanide-based solid fission products which are known to play a detrimental role in FCCI. Fuel alloys of U-Zr-Sb-Nd and U-Zr-Te-Nd were evaluated in their annealed condition and compared against their as-cast conditions. Isothermal diffusion couple experiments were performed between U-Zr-Nd, U-Zr-Sb-Nd, and U-Zr-Te-Nd against the cladding alloy HT9 to evaluate the effectiveness of the additives to stabilize Nd within the fuel alloys, as well as investigate the interaction regions that form between the different fuel alloys and HT9. Further, SbNd and Sb 3 Nd 4 , and TeNd are found to be the primary neodymium-based phases formed in the U-Zr-Sb-Nd and U-Zr-Te-Nd alloys, respectively. The zirconium-based phase, Zr 2 Sb, is also found to form within the former alloy. All phases were found to remain stable through the diffusion experiments and exhibited no interaction with HT9 constituent elements. Preferential interaction between Nd with additivities Te and Sb compared to constituting elements in HT9 was further verified based on density functional theory (DFT) calculated enthalpy of mixing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Comparison of Irradiated and Unirradiated Graphite Oxidation Performance

This work examines the oxidation behavior of NBG-25 graphite using irradiated specimens and (not irradiated) companion specimens from the Advanced Graphite Creep (AGC) Experiment. Irradiated and companion specimens were quartered, split into four small samples, to enable four oxidation test runs for each (0.5 inch diameter by 0.25 inch tall) piggyback button obtained from the AGC Experiment inventory. These split samples were oxidized in air in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) and benchmarked against observations with separately sourced same-grade specimens of three geometries oxidized either in the TGA or in a vertical furnace built and operated to satisfy the specifications of ASTM D7542. The study considers both irradiation damage and relief of damage by thermal annealing. A range of isothermal oxidation temperatures were tested for specimens exposed to a similar irradiation environment, nominally 6.5 dpa at 650°C. To assess the dose dependency of observed oxidation behavior, specimens with a range of irradiation exposures (up to 6.8 dpa) were tested at the single oxidation temperature of 650°C. In the conventional analysis (rate determined over the 5-10% mass loss range) any annealing effects appear to be negligible, while irradiation to ~6.5 dpa may double or triple the subsequent oxidation rate. However, examination of rate with extent of reaction (over incremental ranges from initial onset up to 5% mass loss) illustrates that (at least for ~6.5 dpa) irradiation initially inhibits oxidation. Slower rates of oxidation than companion split samples are clearly indicated across all oxidation temperatures tested up to ~0.5% mass loss. Over the range of 0.5-1% mass loss, regardless of normalization strategy, there is no statistically meaningful difference in oxidation rate. However, beyond 0.5% mass loss oxidation of the irradiated sample becomes progressively faster than the companion sample (up to the 10% mass loss level observed).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗