Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium−sulfur batteries”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Fe-single atom catalysts facilitate fast electron transfer with MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes in lithium–sulfur batteries

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) emerge as promising next-generation energy storage systems offering cost-effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and high theoretical energy density. The practical implementation of LSBs faces significant hindrances due to the shuttle effect and sluggish redox reactions. To address these challenges, single-atom catalyst (SAC) based combination materials from d-block elements can offer increased active catalytic sites, rapid charge transfer, accelerated electron migration, and fast sulfur redox conversion kinetics of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). In this study, we fabricated three different LSB cathodes: pure S, S@MoS 2 /SnS 2 , and S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 . These cathodes were then used to explore the cycle life, capacity, rate capability, and redox kinetic reactions of LiPSs while assessing the influence of Fe-SACs on their performance. As a result, LSBs with S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes demonstrate an extended cycle life of 1000 cycles at a C-rate of 0.2C, maintaining a capacity close to 500 mA h g −1 , the highest initial discharge capacity of 1622 mA h g −1 and 1066 mA h g −1 at 0.05C and 0.2C, and excellent rate capabilities of 708 mA h g −1 and 558 mA h g −1 at 1C and 2C, respectively. The synergistic effect of the Fe-SAC-based combination cathode (S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 ) creates plentiful adsorptive and highly active catalytic sites, resulting in substantially enhanced capacity for adsorbing soluble long-chain LiPSs. This facilitates ultra-fast redox kinetics, surpassing the performance of the S@MoS 2 /SnS 2 and pure S cathodes. In the ex situ analysis, results from powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) to observe the new phase, soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to investigate the electronic structure, and hard X-ray photoelectron microscopy (HAXPES) with different energies (900 eV, 2000 eV, and 6000 eV) to track the chemical-state evolution of Fe-SACs in MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes displayed notable electrochemical reversibility involving S 8 ⇄ LiPSs ⇄ Li 2 S conversion even after 1000 cycles. Additionally, in situ, operando Raman analysis can unveil a novel catalytic mechanism of Fe-SACs in MoS 2 /SnS 2 “facilitating rapid electron transfer” during the discharge and charge processes of LSBs involving the conversion of S 8 ⇄ long-chain LiPSs ⇄ Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S. This study elucidates the working mechanism of Fe-SAC cathodes, offering insights into overcoming the shuttle effect and facilitating sulfur redox kinetics to advance commercial LSBs.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Development of Electrolytes under Lean Condition in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries stand out as one of the promising candidates for next-generation electrochemical energy storage technologies. A key requirement to realize high-specific-energy Li–S batteries is to implement low amount of electrolyte, often characterized by the electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratio. Low E/S ratio aggravates the known challenges for Li–S batteries and introduces new ones originated from the high concentration of polysulfides in limited electrolyte reservoir. Here, in this review, the connections between the fundamental properties of electrolytes and the electrochemical/chemical reactions in Li–S batteries under lean electrolyte condition are elucidated. The emphasis is on how the solvating properties of the electrolyte affect the fate of polysulfides. Built upon the mechanistic analysis, different strategies to design lean electrolytes to improve the overall process of Li–S reactions and Li anode protection are discussed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Effect of Antagonistic Binder–Catalyst Interactions on Catalytic Activity in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are a promising next-generation energy storage solution, as they can reduce reliance on critical transition metals while offering high energy densities. However, their deployment is hindered by low sulfur utilization and the formation/diffusion of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). While transition-metal catalysts and polymeric binders have been independently developed to enhance redox kinetics and LiPS adsorption, their mutual compatibility has remained largely unexplored. We show here that binder-catalyst interactions can significantly impact catalytic performance. Employing TiO 2 as a generic catalyst, the electrochemical performance is shown to depend strongly on the binder environment. TiO 2 paired with lithiated polyacrylic acid (LiPAA) shows benign interactions, resulting in enhanced cycle life. In contrast, pairing TiO 2 with protonated PAA produces antagonistic interactions that hinder Li 2 S growth. A mechanistic analysis unveils that the carboxylic H atom in PAA promotes COO − coordination to Ti sites, occupying catalytic centers and suppressing LiPS adsorption, increasing charge transfer and diffusion resistances. This phenomenon is observed across multiple catalysts, indicating that COOH-functionalized binders may broadly hinder catalytic activity. Overall, this study underscores the need for holistic cathode design and identifies binder-catalyst compatibility as an important parameter for high-performance Li-S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Metal–Organic Framework-derived Atomic Metal Sites Promoting Sulfur Cathode for All-Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

All-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs) offer high energy density and intrinsic safety; however, they still face major challenges, including sluggish redox kinetics and poor sulfur utilization. Incorporating conductive materials into sulfur cathodes is an effective strategy to mitigate these limitations. Here, a highly conductive cobalt–nitrogen–doped carbon (Co–NC) derived from a metal–organic framework (MOF) is introduced to accelerate charge transfer and promote reversible sulfur conversion. Co−NC provides atomically dispersed Co–N sites and conductive carbon pathways that correlate with improved charge transfer, sulfur utilization, and rate capability. Co–NC@S cathode delivers 1499 mAh g–1 at C/20 with a high sulfur loading (5 mg cm–2) and retains 1292 mAh g–1 after five cycles (vs 443 mAh g–1 without Co–NC). Moreover, Co–NC derived ASSLSB achieves 903 mAh g–1 at 5C at 60 °C. This work provides a practical and effective approach to develop high energy, high-rate ASSLSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Deciphering the Dynamic Balance Between Solvation Strength and Polysulfides Reaction Heterogeneity in Practical Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries

Achieving stable interfacial chemistry in lithium–sulfur batteries under practical conditions remains a key barrier to commercialization. Here, we demonstrate that interfacial dynamics can be effectively regulated by coupling solvation-power control with intrinsic heterogeneity of sulfur redox chemistry through the introduction of a weakly solvating fluorinated cosolvent, LIB 1200ET (1200ET). Compared with conventional fluorinated ethers, 1200ET efficiently shifts Li + solvation environment toward a more non-coordinated configuration at low volume fractions, enabling substantial solvation modulation without significantly impairing sulfur redox kinetics. This solvation transition weakens Li + –solvent interactions while strengthening Li + –anion and Li + –lithium polysulfide (LPS) coordination, suppressing LPS solubility and promoting reconstruction of solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI). Regulated LPS chemistry, together with 1200ET, leads to formation of a S 4+ -rich, LiF-reinforced SEI with enhanced ionic conductivity and mechanical robustness. Spatially resolved sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy on pouch cells reveals pronounced current-density-dependent chemical heterogeneity, distinguishing kinetically dominated and solvation-controlled regions. Under practical conditions (3.7 mg cm −2 sulfur loading, E/S = 6 µL mg −1 ), a single-layer pouch cell delivers 527 mAh g −1 over 200 cycles at C/3, while an Ah-level multilayer pouch cell achieves an energy density of 358 Wh kg −1 . These results establish non-coordinating cosolvent-driven solvation engineering as a scalable strategy for practical Li–S batteries.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Holistic Stabilization of the Anode in Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries Through a Ternary Alloy Fusion

The anode in lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) is plagued by not only inhomogeneous lithium (Li) deposition, but also by parasitic side-reactions. Often, a thick anode (∼400 µm) is used to compensate for these drawbacks, lowering gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. In this work, we demonstrate a ternary alloy anode fabricated via scalable thermal fusion of Li with aluminum (Al) and tellurium (Te) to cohesively address these issues. The Al–Li skeleton serves to homogenize Li deposition as well as reinforce the anode, allowing it to be rolled down to low thicknesses. Te incorporation suppresses the reaction of Li with polysulfides (Li 2 Sn) to form lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) and electrolyte degradation. It can also facilitate the formation of polytellurosulfides (Li 2 Te x Sy), which are far more conducive to Li + -ion diffusion. Even under a lean electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratio of 8 µL mg −1 and a low negative/positive (N/P) ratio of 3, capacities over 900 mA h g −1 at a C/5 rate are obtained in cells with Li–Te–Al anodes with a capacity retention of 80% after 70 cycles. In comparison, the baseline lithium-metal anode retains only 35% after 50 cycles. Furthermore, the Li–Te–Al anodes confer a 24% boost to gravimetric energy density at the pouch cell level.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

High‐Loading Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries with Solvent‐Free Dry‐Electrode Processing

Abstract Lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries, with their high energy density, nontoxicity, and the natural abundance of sulfur, hold immense potential as the next‐generation energy storage technology. To maximize the actual energy density of the Li‐S batteries for practical applications, it is crucial to escalate the areal capacity of the sulfur cathode by fabricating an electrode with high sulfur loading. Herein, ultra‐high sulfur loading (up to 12 mg cm −2 ) cathodes are fabricated through an industrially viable and sustainable solvent‐free dry‐processing method that utilizes a polytetrafluoroethylene binder fibrillation. Due to its low porosity cathode architecture formed by the binder fibrillation process, the dry‐processed electrodes exhibit a relatively lower initial capacity compared to the slurry‐processed electrode. However, its mechanical stability is well maintained throughout the cycling without the formation of electrode cracking, demonstrating significantly superior cycling stability. Additionally, through the optimization of the dry‐processing, a single‐layer pouch cell with a loading of 9 mg cm −2 and a novel multi‐layer pouch cell that uses an aluminum mesh as its current collector with a total loading of 14 mg cm −2 are introduced. To address the reduced initial capacity of dry‐processed electrodes, strategies such as incorporating electrocatalysts or employing prelithiated active materials are suggested.

Chemistry↗

Lithium–Sulfur Batteries Enabled by Fluorine-Free Electrolytes with a Compressed Solvation Structure

In this paper, a fluorine-free aromatic cosolvent strategy is presented to regulate electrolyte solvation chemistry in Li-S batteries with sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) cathodes. Assisted by the Uni-ELF AI tool and experimental validation, toluene is identified as an optimal weakly solvating cosolvent. Its incorporation compresses the Li⁺ solvation sheath and induces an anion-dominated solvation structure, thereby enhancing interfacial ion transport and sulfur redox kinetics through controlled π-π interactions with polysulfides. Consequently, Li || Li symmetric cells exhibit stable cycling for over 1,000 cycles at a current density of 1 mA cm⁻². Meanwhile, Li-S cells employing high-loading SPAN cathodes retain more than 75% of their initial capacity after 250 cycles at -10 °C. Additionally, a practical pouch cell with high SPAN loading and a low electrolyte-to-SPAN ratio of 3 µL mg⁻¹ delivers an initial capacity of around 600 mAh gSPAN⁻¹, underscoring the potential of fluorine-free electrolytes for practical metal-sulfur batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Fluorinated Glyme Solvents to Extend Lithium-Sulfur Battery Life (Final Technical Report, Unlimited)

This project investigated a number of partially fluorinated glymes (PFGs) as electrolyte cosolvents to improve the performance of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. A major issue in Li-S cells is the electrochemical reaction of sulfur in the cathode to form lithium polysulfides (LPS) that dissolve in the electrolyte. Those LPS are electrochemically and chemically reactive at the lithium anode, resulting in lithium sulfide deposition on the anode and also electrochemical reaction at both the anode and cathode, leading to a “polysulfide shuttle” and reduced coulombic efficiency (CE) and self-discharge of the cell. PFGs reduce the solubility of LPS while maintaining good solubility of lithium salts such as LiTFSI. By adjusting the amount of PFG as cosolvent in the electrolyte, we showed that the solubility of LPS in the electrolyte can be tuned. (It is not desirable to completely eliminate LPS in the electrolyte, as they facilitate electrochemical reaction of the electrically insulating S 8 and Li 2 S within the cathode by shuttling charge between them and the conductive carbon.) Another issue in Li-S cells is degradation of the Li anode over many cycles of stripping (discharge) and plating (charge). We showed that PFGs have a beneficial effect on the physical morphology of the Li anode, SEI formation, and the CE of a Li-Li cell. Among the many PFGs tested, we found the best performance from PFGs designated PFG2 and PFG5, and these two PFGs were thoroughly studied. A systematic coin-cell study of electrolyte solvents of 90:10, 80:20, or 70:30 DME:PFG (DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane) revealed some systematic trends: a higher percentage of PFG solvent led to substantially longer cycle life, but at the same time reduced specific capacity (mAh/g(S)) and cell capacity at higher rates. These studies used LiFSI as the electrolyte salt, as it was found to extend cycle life compared to LiTFSI. Finally, the addition of a small amount of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) to the electrolyte was found to be beneficial. The overall optimal electrolyte solution was found to be 0.6 M LiFSI + 0.5 M LiNO 3 in 75:5:20 DME/DOL/PFG (either PFG2 or PFG5).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

High Sulfur Loading and Capacity Retention in Bilayer Garnet Sulfurized‐Polyacrylonitrile/Lithium‐Metal Batteries with Gel Polymer Electrolytes

The cubic‐garnet (Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 , LLZO) lithium–sulfur battery shows great promise in the pursuit of achieving high energy densities. The sulfur used in the cathodes is abundant, inexpensive, and possesses high specific capacity. In addition, LLZO displays excellent chemical stability with Li metal; however, the instabilities in the sulfur cathode/LLZO interface can lead to performance degradation that limits the development of these batteries. Therefore, it is critical to resolve these interfacial challenges to achieve stable cycling. Here, an innovative gel polymer buffer layer to stabilize the sulfur cathode/LLZO interface is created. Employing a thin bilayer LLZO (dense/porous) architecture as a solid electrolyte and significantly high sulfur loading of 5.2 mg cm −2 , stable cycling is achieved with a high initial discharge capacity of 1542 mAh g −1 (discharge current density of 0.87 mA cm −2 ) and an average discharge capacity of 1218 mAh g −1 (discharge current density of 1.74 mA cm −2 ) with 80% capacity retention over 265 cycles, at room temperature (22 °C) and without applied pressure. Achieving such stability with high sulfur loading is a major step in the development of potentially commercial garnet lithium–sulfur batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Army position on lithium battery safety

User requirements for lithium sulfur batteries are presented. They include careful analysis of design and quality control, along with certain equipment specifications. Some of the specifications include: hermetically sealed cells; lithium limited cells with stoichiometry of lithium to sulfur dioxide as a ratio of one; low moisture content in the cells; and battery capacity.

Reiss, E.↗

Catalytic disproportionation on carbon superstructures enables long-life, high-loading Li–S batteries

Electrocatalysis has been widely explored as an effective strategy to accelerate polysulfide (PS) conversion and suppress the shuttle effect in lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive, and electrocatalytic reactions are inactive during cell resting. In this work, we reveal and quantitatively analyze a previously unrecognized sulfur reduction route (SRR) driven by catalytic disproportionation at the carbon cathode surface—fundamentally distinct from conventional electrocatalysis. Unlike conventional stepwise pathways, this SRR enables high-order polysulfides (Sₓ²⁻, x = 5–8) to directly convert into S₈ and Li₂S₂, bypassing low-order intermediates. This sulfur-reduction shortcut is systematically elucidated through high-performance liquid chromatography, revealing the intrinsic catalytic contribution of carbon frameworks and the dynamic evolution of PS species. We demonstrate that carbon superstructures (CSS-0.5), assembled from nanosheet subunits with abundant N/O functionalities and interconnected charge-migration channels, synergistically promote this catalytic process. Benefiting from these features, CSS-0.5 delivers superior electrochemical performance under practical conditions, enabling high sulfur loading (6.0 mg cm⁻²) pouch cells with 80.5% capacity retention over 210 cycles. This study provides the first quantitative evidence of electrocatalytic disproportionation in Li–S batteries, offering mechanistic insights and design principles for advanced sulfur cathodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Particle Tracking Methods for Battery Precipitation Reactions

Precipitation and deposition reactions at solid–liquid interfaces play a key role in a number of battery chemistries, including Li-ion, so-called “anode free” batteries, zinc-based battery chemistries, and lithium–sulfur, among others. Although models with heterogeneous nucleation and growth phenomena are present in the literature, papers have not to date provided much detail on the numerical algorithms used to track the temporal evolution of the particle size distribution of deposits on electrode surfaces. In this paper we examine several approaches to discretize and track the particle size distribution, demonstrating that common approaches lead to anomalous flattening of the particle size distribution. We conclude by presenting an algorithm that preserves the appropriate particle size distribution during particle growth.

Algorithms↗

Cathode-Confined Polysulfide Retention-Release Reprograms Li 2 S Deposition in High-Loading Li–S Batteries

High-loading lithium-sulfur (Li-S) cells operated with lean electrolyte are limited by polysulfide crossover to Li metal and by transport-limited liquid-solid conversion that forms passivating Li 2 S films. Here, we show that a cathode-facing separator coating of carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes acts as a cathode-confined polysulfide reservoir with intermediate binding. Early in discharge it captures newly generated polysulfides at the separator interface, suppressing shuttle reactions. As polysulfides are consumed, the reservoir buffers concentration gradients and feeds reactants back to the cathode, shifting Li 2 S deposition from burst-like film growth to progressive, three-dimensional, porous formation. Synchrotron XRD and S K-edge XANES, together with Scharifker–Hills nucleation analysis and depth-of-discharge EIS/DRT, substantiate this coupled transport–reaction control. With 4.3 mg S cm -2 and E/S = 5, cells reach 4.2 mAh cm -2 and retain 90% capacity over 100 cycles at 20 °C.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Dry Pressed, High Areal Loading Electrode Architectures Enabled by Holey Graphene

For future electric aviation, advanced battery cell chemistry beyond lithium ion batteries are required to meet mission requirements. High energy density battery concepts such as lithium-sulfur (Li-S) and lithiumoxygen (Li-O2) chemistries are being intensively investigated to realize their extraordinary theoretical promise in terms of energy density. Most fabrication methods of cathodes for these novel battery chemistries followed a conventional approach. In this approach, the active material is mixed with a polymer binder and a conductive carbon in a high-boiling organic solvent to form a slurry, followed by casting onto a current collector and solvent evaporation. The process is usually lengthy and poses environmental hazards due to the use of organic solvents.

Lin Yi↗

The 2000 NASA Aerospace Battery Workshop

This document contains the proceedings of the 33nd annual NASA Aerospace Battery Workshop, hosted by the Marshall Space Flight Center on November 14-16, 2000. The workshop was attended by scientists and engineers from various agencies of the U.S. Government, aerospace contractors, and battery manufacturers, as well as international participation in like kind from a number of countries around the world. The subjects covered included nickel-hydrogen, lithium-ion, lithium-sulfur, and silver-zinc technologies.

Brewer, J. C.↗