Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium isotope separation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

A Comprehensive Review of Selected Major Categories of Lithium Isotope Separation Techniques

The ability to generate materials with an enriched isotopic abundance, that is one that differs from natural abundance, is critical in terms of technology. Isotopes are used in a wide range of applications, including radioactive tracers, nondestructive tests, radiotherapy in human medicine, nuclear fuels, and isotope‐substituted compounds for chemistry and biology research, as well as environmental geochemical signature tracers. A commonly discussed research topic is the isotopic separation of various elements—uranium, hydrogen, lithium, and iodine, among many others. Among these isotopes, lithium isotopes are especially important in various applications including strategic areas. These isotopes are light and hence their separation techniques are not very obvious. Herein, all the main categories of Li isotope separation are reviewed in depth with a focus on electrochemical technologies for stable lithium isotope separation.

Murali, Arun↗

Deep Eutectic Solvents as Candidates for Lithium Isotope Enrichment

Nuclear fusion is a phenomenon that is well known within the nuclear physics community as a viable option for alternative energy as many natural gases and fossil fuels are phased out of commercial use. Deuterium and tritium fusion reactions are currently the leading candidates for nuclear fusion, with a major limiting factor being a means to produce tritium on an industrial scale. Lithium-6 is a well-known isotope that can produce tritium and helium following a fission reaction with a neutron. Unfortunately, the lithium-6 enrichment methods are limited to the COLEX process, which leaves behind an alarming amount of mercury waste as a potential environmental contaminant. Deep eutectic solvents are believed to be a potential alternative to lithium isotope separations due to the ease of generation, in addition to the minimum environmental waste generated when these solvents are employed. Previous studies have suggested that deep eutectic solvents are capable of separating lithium isotopes by utilizing a 2-thenoyltrifluoroacetone and trioctylphosphine oxide system that can biphasically react with a buffered solution containing lithium chloride. This system displays a separation factor of 1.068, which when compared to the 1.054 separation within the COLEX process, makes it a potential candidate for lithium-6/7 separation. Within this study, we investigate this system in comparison to two newly synthesized deep eutectic solvents and find that within these acetylacetone-based systems, little isotopic separation is observed. We investigate these systems both experimentally and computationally, showing the different lithium cation affinities, in addition to proposing how the electron-donating or -withdrawing nature can influence these systems.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Modeling Isotope Separation in Electrochemical Lithium Deposition

Naturally occurring Li consists of two stable isotopes, 6 Li with an abundance of about 7.5%, and 7 Li making up the remainder with 92.5%. The development of a 6 Li enrichment technique, in terms of technical reliability and environmental safety to reach 6 Li future requirements, represents a key step in the roadmap for nuclear fusion energy supply worldwide. This paper uses finite element analysis-based models to simulate electrochemical Li isotope separation, which is an attractive method in terms of simplicity, safety, and scalability. In the model, we quantitatively analyze how different electrochemical factors including thermodynamics, charge-transfer kinetics, and diffusivities affect the separation process (separation factor), together with cell parameters, such as cell length and current density. The maximum separation factor of 1.128 could be obtained with the cell under the optimal thermodynamic, kinetic, and diffusive conditions, which is among the highest separation factors ever reported. Furthermore, these results will assist in designing the actual isotope separation setup with large separation factor and appropriate timing for sample collection.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Lithium isotopic analysis in depleted lithium salts

Lithium isotope separation processes require characterization of the isotopic compositions of the different output phases of the process. While considerable effort to develop isotope separation methods has been ongoing for decades, the analytical methods associated with these analyses are rarely provided. Here, in this work three types of mass spectrometers (Q-ICP-MS, MC-ICP-MS, TIMS) were tested for the ability to measure depleted lithium salts that are relevant materials for isotopic separations. Results indicate that, once stabilized, the Q-ICP-MS can provide equal precision for Li isotopic samples compared to TIMS or MC-ICP-MS. However, MC-ICP-MS consistently provides the highest precision for salts across both depleted and natural isotopic abundances. These data demonstrate that Q-ICP-MS is an appropriate choice for analysis of depleted lithium salts, especially when rapid analyses are desired for online process monitoring.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

ICP-MS For Analysis of Lithium Isotopic Ratios in Materials Highly Enriched in 7 Li (CRADA 626) Final Report

The intent of this project was to determine appropriate methodologies for analysis of lithium isotopes for 1) quasi-online monitoring of isotope separations, and 2) high-precision characterization of end-products, including lithium fluoride and lithium-beryllium fluoride (FLiBe). Traditionally, isotopic analysis requires the use of expensive, sophisticated instrumentation with often relatively long analytical timelines. We determined that the use of cheaper, smaller, and easier-to-operate instruments are sufficient for rapid analysis of lithium isotopes to monitor isotope separation efficiencies. In addition, we found that the analytical precision afforded by these lower-cost instruments is comparable to the more sophisticated (i.e., more expensive) instrumentation when the isotopic composition of lithium becomes highly depleted in 6Li. This finding will ultimately help lower costs of manufacturing of depleted lithium that is required for operation of certain designs of Generation IV nuclear reactors.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Advanced Isotope Separation Technology for Fusion Fuel

Deuterium-tritium fusion is the easiest nuclear fusion reaction among known fusion reactions. Since tritium is extremely rare, it is artificially produced by irradiating lithium metal. The separation, isolation, and storage of the tritium isotope has been a major focus of the Savannah River Site (SRS) for many decades. Thermal diffusion, fractional absorption, and cryogenic distillation have all been used in the past, and each has significant operational and safety challenges. A process known as the Thermal Cycling Absorption Process (TCAP) was invented at SRS, and because of its overwhelming advantages in safety, efficiency, size, and reduced tritium inventory, it has replaced all other hydrogen isotope separation processes at SRS. Here, the working principles and current development of hydrogen isotope separation using TCAP at SRS are explained as a potential advanced isotope separation process for the fusion fuel cycle.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Physics Division Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024

The vision of the Physics Division (PHY) at Argonne National Laboratory is to continue enhancing its role as a world-leading institution in basic nuclear physics research and its applications. Key to this vision is for PHY to continue to safely and effectively operate and evolve the capabilities of the Argonne Tandem Linac Accelerator System (ATLAS) facility to best serve its users. ATLAS is the Department of Energy (DOE) accelerator facility for low-energy nuclear physics research. The research carried out by PHY covers many themes in contemporary science but can be distilled into five areas of focus. These themes are interconnected, with continuously evolving synergies between the various groups and facilities in PHY and the broader Laboratory. This five-year strategic plan serves to illustrate our current capabilities and new directions related to these five areas of focus (ATLAS also develops an independent strategic plan): Accelerator research and design. The goal of this theme is to design, fabricate, test, and implement novel accelerator systems, with a focus on high-intensity ion and electron systems. These R&D activities have led to enhancements in the ATLAS accelerator system. Among others, the division’s accelerator systems are in use or planned for use at Fermilab, the Advanced Photon Source, and in a broad variety of applications at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB). Atom trapping and fundamental symmetries. The goal of this theme is to explore and exploit the uses of advanced laser cooling and trapping techniques to manipulate atoms. There are three main areas of focus. First is in the application of the atom trap trace analysis (ATTA) technique for age determination of groundwater and ice by using radio-krypton dating. The next two trapping-based programs involve tests of fundamental symmetries in nature: the cooling and trapping of radium-225 with the aim of determining limits on an observation of its electric dipole moment and precision measurements of the beta decay properties of helium-6 to set limits on the tensor coupling constant. This is complemented by measurements of similar properties in lithium-8 and boron-8. Nuclear astrophysics. The goal of this theme is to enhance our understanding of how elements are created in the universe via explosive nucleosynthesis and how stars evolve. To meet the challenges of this theme, many of the capabilities of ATLAS are being enhanced, including the development of new beams through a new in-flight separator (RAISOR) and the anticipated neutron-generator upgrade of the Californium Rare Isotope Breeder Upgrade facility (nuCARIBU). These are coupled to state-of-the-art instruments such as the Canadian Penning Trap, Helical Orbit Spectrometer, Gammasphere, GRETINA, Multi-Sampling Ionization Chamber, the Fragment Mass Analyzer, and Argonne Gas-filled Fragment Analyzer, and a new low-background experimental area for decay studies. Nuclear structure. The goal of this theme is to understand the structure of nuclei, both stable and radioactive, in terms of single-particle properties, their shapes, and the dynamics governing reactions between them. These include questions such as what are the limits of nuclear stability and what are the properties of super heavy nuclei. As with the nuclear astrophysics theme, the capabilities of ATLAS, guided by the ATLAS user community, are continuously being enhanced to this end. The Division has strategic initiatives to play a leading role in the development of instrumentation and research programs at the FRIB. Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and hadron physics. The goal of this theme is to lead major research programs focused on revealing the quark and gluon structure of protons, neutrons, nuclei, and short-lived mesons and baryons. These involve major programs at Jefferson Lab, Fermilab, and smaller facilities. They are complemented by theoretical endeavors centered on the question of how hadrons and their properties emerge from QCD. Out of these activities arise strategic initiatives to play a major role in the forthcoming Electron-Ion Collider (EIC).

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Comparison of Fuel Cycles for Lead-Lithium and Pure Lithium Liquid Metal Walls in a Magnetized Target Fusion Power Plant

General Fusion (GF) is developing an adaptable, commercial fusion power plant based on magnetized target fusion (MTF). The GF approach involves forming a spherical torus of deuterium-tritium plasma in a large (~4 m diameter) cavity formed in liquid metal, and then collapsing that cavity with an array of pneumatic piston drivers. The liquid metal is constantly flowing through the fusion chamber and out to processing systems where tritium and heat will be extracted using tritium extraction technologies and heat exchangers, respectively. Here, this study focuses on two candidate designs for the liquid metal blanket and first wall material for the General Fusion Magnetized Target Fusion (GF MTF) power plant and assesses their impact on the tritium fuel cycle. The first candidate is the lead lithium eutectic (LLE) and the second candidate is pure lithium (Li). It was found that the main differences between LLE and Li designs are the extraction technologies required to remove tritium from the blanket and the amount of tritium and its distribution within the facility. More than 80% of the in-process tritium inventory for the LLE design is contained in the isotope separation system, while for the Li design, over 60% of the in-process tritium inventory is contained within the blanket material. This is due to significant tritium retention by Li. For the Li blanket, the burden of tritium processing rests on the blanket extraction technology rather than the traditional exhaust processing route. Thus, the blanket extraction technology is a main driver of tritium inventory in the Li system and determines the subsequent interface with the tritium processing plant.

General Fusion↗

Savannah River National Laboratory – General Fusion 2023 INFUSE Report (Rev.1)

This report describes the results from an INFUSE research project, where Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) in collaboration with General Fusion (GF) used process modeling to understand and optimize commercial power plant (CPP) fuel cycle designs based on parameters provided by GF. The study primarily focused on two candidate fuel cycles with different blanket materials, one with a lead lithium eutectic (LLE) blanket and the other with a pure lithium (Li) blanket. LLE benefits from a low melting point, favorable neutronics, and lower reactivity, but liquid lithium has the potential for higher tritium breeding ratios (TBR) and does not poison the plasma as a high Z contaminant. It was found that the main differences between LLE and Li designs are the extraction technologies required to remove tritium from the blanket and the amount of tritium and its distribution within the facility. More than 80% of the in-process tritium inventory for the LLE design is contained in the isotope separation system, while for the Li design, over 60% of the in-process tritium inventory is contained within the blanket material. This is due to significant tritium retention by Li. For the Li blanket, the burden of tritium processing rests on the blanket extraction technology rather than the traditional exhaust processing route. Thus, the blanket extraction technology is a main driver of tritium inventory in the Li system and determines the subsequent interface with the tritium processing plant.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Parametric Study of Used Nuclear Oxide Fuel Constituent Dissolution in Molten LiCl-KCl-UCl 3

Prior work identified dissolution of used nuclear oxide fuel constituents from a uranium oxide matrix into molten LiCl-KCl-UCl 3 at 500°C, prompting a subsequent series of three progressive studies (including an initial scoping study, an electrolytic dissolution study, and a chemical-seeded dissolution study) to further investigate associated parameters and mechanisms. Thermodynamic calculations were performed to identify possible reaction mechanisms and their propensities in used oxide fuel constituent dissolution. Used nuclear oxide fuels with varying preconditions from fast and thermal test reactors were separately immersed in the subject salt system to assess fuel constituent migration from the bulk fuel matrix to the salt phase in an initial scoping study. Dissolution of expected fuel constituents, including alkali, alkaline earth, lanthanide, and transuranium oxides, into the chloride salt phase varied widely, ranging from 12% to 99% in the initial study. Uranium isotope blending between the salt phase and bulk fuel matrix was also observed, which was attributed to reducing conditions in the fuel matrix. Electrolytic and chemical-seeded dissolution studies were subsequently performed to effect reducing conditions in the fuel. Other parameters, including temperature (at 500°C, 650°C, 725°C, and 800°C) and uranium trichloride concentrations (at 6, 9, and 19 wt% uranium), were investigated in the latter two studies, resulting in fuel constituent dissolution above 90%. Extents of dissolution were based on initial and final fuel constituent concentrations in the oxide fuels following operations in the salt and subsequent removal of the salt via distillation. Finally, in this series of progressive studies, oxide fuel preconditioning and in situ reducing conditions, along with elevated temperature and uranium trichloride concentrations, were the primary parameters promoting used nuclear oxide fuel constituent dissolution in accordance with identified reaction mechanisms.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ENDF/B-VIII.1: Thermal Neutron Scattering Sublibrary

The thermal neutron scattering law (TSL) sublibrary aims to describe the interaction of incident neutrons at thermal or sub-thermal energies with different compound materials such fuels, moderators and special-purpose materials. In ENDF/B-VIII.1 there was a large number of new and updated TSL evaluations, including traditional moderators (light water, Beryllium metal, Beryllium Oxide, Calcium Hydride, plastics (Polystyrene and Lucite), graphite (reactor-grade and crystalline), anhydrous Hydrogen Fluoride, and heavy paraffinic oil); exotic moderators (Beryllium Carbide, Zirconium Hydride, Yttrium Hydride, Lithium-7 Hydride and Deuteride), FLiBe molten salt, structural materials and cladding (Silicon Carbide, Silicon Dioxide, Zirconium Carbide), fuels (Plutonium Dioxide, Uranium Carbide, Uranium metal, Uranium Nitride, Uranium Dioxide, Uranium Hydride), and special purpose materials. In ENDF/B-VIII.1 we also distribute alongside the evaluated files, a comma-separated file (CSV), named TSL_MAT_numbers.csv, which lists all evaluated files in the current release and their corresponding unique MAT number.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Accelerator commissioning and rare isotope identification at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams

In 2008, Michigan State University was selected to establish the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB). Construction of the FRIB accelerator was completed in January 2022. Phased accelerator commissioning with heavy ion beams started in 2017 with the normal-conducting ion source and radio-frequency quadrupole. In April 2021, the full FRIB driver linear accelerator (linac) was commissioned, with heavy ion beams accelerated to energies above 200 MeV/nucleon by 324 superconducting radiofrequency (SRF) resonators operating at 2 K and 4 K with liquid-helium cooling. Further, in preparation for high-power operation, a liquid lithium charge stripper was commissioned with heavy ion beams up to uranium-238, followed by the simultaneous acceleration of multiple-charge-state heavy ion beams to energies above 200 MeV/nucleon. In December 2021, selenium-84 was produced with the FRIB target using a krypton-86 primary beam, demonstrating FRIB’s capability for scientific discovery.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗