Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “sytems”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

AmeriFlux FLUXNET-1F US-HWB USDA ARS Pasture Sytems and Watershed Management Research Unit- Hawbecker Site

This is the AmeriFlux Management Project (AMP) created FLUXNET-1F version of the carbon flux data for the site US-HWB USDA ARS Pasture Sytems and Watershed Management Research Unit- Hawbecker Site. This is the FLUXNET version of the carbon flux data for the site US-HWB USDA ARS Pasture Sytems and Watershed Management Research Unit- Hawbecker Site produced by applying the standard ONEFlux (1F) software. Site Description - Hawbecker farm is owned by Penn State University. The farming that took place was performed by their Farm Operations Division. The ground is rolling terrain, next to wooded areas, the Beef and Sheep Reasearch Farm, The University Airport, and other large fields maintained by Farm Operations. At the time of this collection period, the site housed another Meteorological Site, a Phenocam, and the GraceNet plots. Crop Rotation during period was 2 years Alfalfa, 1 year Corn for grain and 1 year Wheat.

Goslee, Sarah↗
DOE OSTI2021

AmeriFlux US-HWB USDA ARS Pasture Sytems and Watershed Management Research Unit- Hawbecker Site

This is the AmeriFlux version of the carbon flux data for the site US-HWB USDA ARS Pasture Sytems and Watershed Management Research Unit- Hawbecker Site. Site Description - Hawbecker farm is owned by Penn State University. The farming that took place was performed by their Farm Operations Division. The ground is rolling terrain, next to wooded areas, the Beef and Sheep Reasearch Farm, The University Airport, and other large fields maintained by Farm Operations. At the time of this collection period, the site housed another Meteorological Site, a Phenocam, and the GraceNet plots. Crop Rotation during period was 2 years Alfalfa, 1 year Corn for grain and 1 year Wheat.

Goslee, Sarah↗
DOE OSTI2020

Development and Characterization of 3D-Printed Cementitious Sytems for Innovative Nuclear Systems

The Transformational Challenge Reactor (TCR) is being developed to demonstrate a revolutionary approach to deploying new nuclear power systems by building and operating an additively manufactured microreactor. This initiative provides a unique opportunity to investigate the possibility of taking advantage of the recent development of the 3D-printed concrete system using the Sky Big Area Additive Manufacturing (SkyBAAM) printer at the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Two pathways have been pursued in parallel since the end of the second quarter of FY19: 1. Development of methods to characterize the performance of additive manufacturing concrete using traditional Portland-cement based solution, and 2. Investigation of the opportunity to develop innovation of printable materials with higher irradiation-resistance performance using nontraditional concrete solutions in favor of carbonated cementitious materials (CCMs). This report describes the results achieved to date for both pathways. The main results are listed below: 1. A test protocol has been established to characterize the fracture properties of 3D-printed concrete; this protocol will be used to assess the performance of printed traditional and nontraditional cementitious materials, with a focus on performance of the interfaces inherent to the additive manufacturing process. 2. A state-of-the-art review of the mechanisms, fabrication method, and performance of CCMs was conducted. CCMs appear to be a viable, highly innovative, more performant alternative to Portland-based cementitious solution for the erection of biological shield pending some materials development.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Resilience Development for Electric Energy Delivery Sytems (ResDEEDS): A Tool for Power System Resilience Planning (Rev. 1)

The INL Resilience Framework is built to be customized to a particular system’s characteristics, resilience goals, and hazards that it is likely to face. The challenge with a framework that is built to be customized is that it requires more effort from the user to understand the framework and apply it correctly to a particular system. The goal of the web application described here is to automate the framework application as much as possible. Inputs from users are standardized into a common format, but the modeling platform used is a modular framework built to adapt to any system. Baseline effects from common hazards are programmed with stochastic variables to allow for quick exploration of hazard impacts, but can be customized down to component-level impact if a user desires a high level of detail and specificity.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Formulation of Three-Phase State Estimation Problem Using a Virtual Reference

State Estimation (SE) is the backbone of modern Energy Management System (EMS) due its capability of processing real time measurements and provide reliable information to system operators. Since its introduction to power systems in the 70’s, SE has been widely used in transmission networks. Distribution grids on the other hand lack sufficient number of real time measurements, and for that reason SE has not been widely implemented on these systems. The recent increase in the number of renewable energy sources connected to the grid at lower voltage levels, the advent of Distribution Automation (DA) and Smart Grids necessitate closer monitoring of distribution networks and thus forcing utilities to upgrade their operations and deploy Advanced Distribution Management Sytems (ADMS). Therefore, Distribution System State Estimation (DSE) is paramount to provide real time monitoring of active distribution grids. This papers investigates the formulation of the three-phase distribution state estimation where in the most general case, none of the system buses may have balanced three phase voltages. In such a case, the choice and definition of the slack bus need to be revisited. Most of the existing work arbitrarily assign the root bus of the distribution feeder as the balanced three-phase reference which may not be realistic for today’s active distribution systems. This paper addresses this shortcoming of the existing SE formulations by introducing a virtual reference bus. Here, the proposed approach is effectively validated by simulations carried out on distribution test systems.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
DOE OSTI2023

PacWave South SeaRAY k2 Risk Registers

The SeaRAY is a deployable power system for maritime sensors, monitoring equipment, communications, unmanned underwater vehicles, and other similar payloads. This project is to design, deliver, and test a prototype low-power WEC that lowers the total cost of ownership and provides robust, new capabilities for customers in the maritime environment. Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) is conducted to systematically identify all potential failure modes and their effects on the system, and to analyze the criticality of each risk based on the likelihood of the event and the severity of the impact. Actions may then be recommended to mitigate the criticality of a risk, either by reducing the likelihood of the risk or the severity of its impact. Risk assessment is executed iteratively as an integral part of the design process. By incorporating risk assessment early in the development cycle, mitigation of risk can be achieved cost effectively. The actions recommended to mitigate risk may be subsequently executed, and as the design progresses the risk assessment is reviewed and revised. Review of the risk assessment is integrated into structured design reviews, ensuring that critical risks are comprehended and that the Project will not progress to e.g. fabrication while intolerable risks remain. The risk assessment process results in the population and maintenance of Risk Registers (RRs). Each major system (and as needed, subsystem) will have a distinct RR. This allows each system or subsystem to be assessed individually, rendering the RRs to a manageable size for review.

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗