Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “transonic buffet”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Simulating Transonic Buffet Aerodynamics for the Boeing Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft

The flow past the Boeing Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircraft is simulated with a Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes Large-Eddy Simulations (HRLES) turbulence modeling approach to study transonic buffet onset and evaluate the predictive capability of the numerical approach. All simulations used structured overset curvilinear grids for the free-air configuration, with all simulations performed using the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) computational framework. Aerodynamic loads and surface pressure obtained from the HRLES solutions are compared to results from unsteady RANS (URANS) and experiments conducted at NASA Ames 11-by 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel. Overall good agreement is obtained in the predicted loads and surface pressure. Unsteady pressure data from HRLES and URANS simulations is utilized to compute power spectral density (PSD) to predict transonic buffet onset and compared to the Kulite data obtained from the experiment. Comparisons of the PSD spectrum also show reasonable agreement with the wind tunnel data, with HRLES and URANS predicting buffet onset at a slightly earlier angle-of-attack than the experiment.

AATT↗
NASA NTRS1991

Some subsonic and transonic buffet characteristics of the twin-vertical-tails of a fighter airplane configuration

Vertical-tail buffet response data were obtained from tests in the Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel using a rigid, 1/6-size, full-span model of an F-18 airplane that was fitted with flexible vertical tails of two different levels of structural stiffness. Response data are presented at Mach numbers from 0.30 to 0.95 over a range of angles of attack from -10 to +40 degrees. These data indicate the following: (1) the buffet response occurs in the first bending mode; (2) the buffet response is a maximum in the angle of attack range from 30 to 40 degrees; (3) the buffet response increases with increasing dynamic pressure, but changes in response are not linearly proportional to the changes in dynamic pressure; (4) the buffet response is larger at M = 0.30 than it is at the higher Mach numbers; and (5) the maximum intensity of the buffeting is described as heavy to severe using an assessment criteria proposed by another investigator.

Moss, Steven W.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Overview of the Space Launch System Transonic Buffet Environment Test Program

Fluctuating aerodynamic loads are a significant concern for the structural design of a launch vehicle, particularly while traversing the transonic flight environment. At these trajectory conditions, unsteady aerodynamic pressures can excite the vehicle dynamic modes of vibration and result in high structural bending moments and vibratory environments. To ensure that vehicle structural components and subsystems possess adequate strength, stress, and fatigue margins in the presence of buffet and other environments, buffet forcing functions are required to conduct the coupled load analysis of the launch vehicle. The accepted method to obtain these buffet forcing functions is to perform wind-tunnel testing of a rigid model that is heavily instrumented with unsteady pressure transducers designed to measure the buffet environment within the desired frequency range. Two wind-tunnel tests of a 3 percent scale rigid buffet model have been conducted at the Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) as part of the Space Launch System (SLS) buffet test program. The SLS buffet models have been instrumented with as many as 472 unsteady pressure transducers to resolve the buffet forcing functions of this multi-body configuration through integration of the individual pressure time histories. This paper will discuss test program development, instrumentation, data acquisition, test implementation, data analysis techniques, and several methods explored to mitigate high buffet environment encountered during the test program. Preliminary buffet environments will be presented and compared using normalized sectional buffet forcing function root-meansquared levels along the vehicle centerline.

Piatak, David J.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Transonic buffet behavior of Northrop F-5A aircraft

Flight tests were performed on an F-5A aircraft to investigate the dynamic buffet pressure distribution on the wing surfaces and the responses during a series of transonic maneuvers called wind-up turns. The conditions under which the tests were conducted are defined. The fluctuating buffet pressure data on the right wing of the aircraft were acquired by miniaturized semiconductor-type pressure transducers flush mounted on the wing. Processing of the fluctuating pressures and responses included the generation of the auto- and cross-power spectra, and of the spatial correlation functions. An analytical correlation procedure was introduced to compute the aircraft response spectra based on the measured buffet pressures.

Hwang, C.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Northrop F-5A aircraft transonic buffet pressure data acquisition and response analysis

Flight tests were performed on an extensively instrumented F-5A aircraft to investigate the dynamic buffet pressure distribution on the wing surfaces and the responses during a series of transonic maneuvers called the windup turns. The maneuvers were performed at three Mach number-altitude combinations with a constant q of approximately 14,360 N/sq m (300 psf). The fluctuating buffet pressure data at 24 stations on the right wing of the F-5A were acquired by miniaturized semiconductor type pressure transducers mounted on the wing. A new transducer mounting and wiring technique was applied where the interference with the natural flow condition was minimized. The data acquired in this manner were found adequate to trace the shock origin, the movement of the shock front and the development of the separated flow (shock-induced or leading-edge induced) on the wing surface. An analytical procedure, called a 'segmentwise stationary procedure', was introduced to compute the aircraft response spectra based on the measured buffet pressures. The analytical response data computed in this manner are correlated with the test response data obtained in the same flights.

Hwang, C.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Transonic buffet behavior of Northrop F-5A aircraft

Flight tests were performed on an extensively instrumented F-5A aircraft to investigate the dynamic buffet pressure distribution on the wing surfaces and the responses during a series of transonic maneuvers called the windup turns. The maneuvers to maximum lift were performed at three Mach number-altitude combinations with a constant 'q' of approximately 14,360 N/sq m (300 psf). The fluctuating buffet pressure data at 24 stations on the right wing of the F-5A were acquired by miniaturized semiconductor type pressure transducers mounted on the wing. A new transducer mounting and wiring technique was applied where the interference with the natural flow condition was minimized. The data acquired in this manner were found adequate to trace the shock origin, the movement of the shock front and the development of the separated flow (shock induced or leading edge induced) on the wing surface.

Hwang, C.↗
NASA NTRS2010

Ares Launch Vehicle Transonic Buffet Testing and Analysis Techniques

It is necessary to define the launch vehicle buffet loads to ensure that structural components and vehicle subsystems possess adequate strength, stress, and fatigue margins when the vehicle structural dynamic response to buffet forcing functions are considered. In order to obtain these forcing functions, the accepted method is to perform wind-tunnel testing of a rigid model instrumented with hundreds of unsteady pressure transducers designed to measure the buffet environment across the desired frequency range. The buffet wind-tunnel test program for the Ares Crew Launch Vehicle employed 3.5 percent scale rigid models of the Ares I and Ares I-X launch vehicles instrumented with 256 unsteady pressure transducers each. These models were tested at transonic conditions at the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel at NASA Langley Research Center. The ultimate deliverable of the Ares buffet test program are buffet forcing functions (BFFs) derived from integrating the measured fluctuating pressures on the rigid wind-tunnel models. These BFFs are then used as input to a multi-mode structural analysis to determine the vehicle response to buffet and the resulting buffet loads and accelerations. This paper discusses the development of the Ares I and I-X rigid buffet model test programs from the standpoint of model design, instrumentation system design, test implementation, data analysis techniques to yield final products, and presents normalized sectional buffet forcing function root-mean-squared levels.

Piatak, David J.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Investigation of steady and fluctuating pressures associated with the transonic buffeting and wing rock of a one-seventh scale model of the F-5A aircraft

A wind tunnel test of a 1/7 scale F-5A model is described. The pressure, force, and dynamic response measurements during buffet and wing rock are evaluated. Effects of Mach number, angle of attack, sideslip angle, and control surface settings were investigated. The mean and fluctuating static pressure data are presented and correlated with some corresponding flight test data of a F-5A aircraft. Details of the instrumentation and the specially designed support system which allowed the model to oscillate in roll to simulate wing rock are also described. A limit cycle mechanism causing wing rock was identified from this study, and this mechanism is presented.

Hwang, C.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulations of Transonic Buffet Over a Supercritical Airfoil

A series of scale-resolving simulations of flow over the ONERA OAT15A airfoil have been performed at an angle of attack of 3.5◦, just past the onset of buffet. The focus of this study is to document the sensitivity of the wall-modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES) methodology for curvilinear structured overset grids within the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) framework to mesh spacing, mesh distribution, and domain size. A secondary purpose of the study is to compare the results from WMLES to unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) simulations and hybrid RANS-LES (HRLES) within the same LAVA solver framework. The study provides a unique perspective regarding comparisons between different turbulence modeling approaches, time-integration methods, and computational performance since many of the same numerical routines are used for all three types of simulations. The results are compared with experiments and previous numerical studies of the same geometry and flow conditions.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Buffet Functions using Frequency-Dependent Coherence Factors

Launch vehicle transonic buffet environments produce large fluctuating pressures on the surface of the vehicle. Transonic buffet occurs as a launch vehicle passes through the transonic regime, typically Mach 0.8 to 1.2, where phenomena such as flow separation and shock dynamics produce large fluctuating pressures. The unsteady aerodynamic forces produced by these phenomena can excite both global and local vehicle structural response. The consequences of incorporating poorly characterized buffet forces into the design process can range from inefficient structures that can reduce the vehicle capabilities to undersized structures that, in the worst case scenario, may result in structural failure (Refs. 1, 2, 3). It is thus imperative to appropriately characterize the transonic buffet environment.

buffet↗
NASA NTRS2025

Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research: Phase V – Buffet Test Report

This test report summarizes work performed by the Boeing Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) team in the Phase V Transonic Truss-Braced Wing contract task. The task was awarded in September 2020, and ended at the end of September 2022. As a part of the SUGAR Phase V contract task, Boeing developed a wind tunnel test plan, model requirements, then fabricated and conducted a dedicated transonic buffet wind tunnel test. The test focused on the investigation of buffet onset, and the ability to accurately predict buffet onset for the TTBW configuration. This report summarizes the results and post-test analysis of the 9% scale, semispan, Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) transonic buffet model tested at the NASA Ames Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (UPWT) 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel (11-Ft TWT) facility located at Moffett Field, CA. It was tested from January 24, 2022, through February 18, 2022. The wind tunnel test was successful in capturing buffet onset at the model design dynamic pressure. Multiple configurations were tested starting in the wing-body-strut configuration and ending with the full configuration including wing-body-strut-nacelle/pylon, and flap hinge. The test also measured the effect of control surface deflections (ailerons and spoilers), as well as the effect of an outboard strut flap. Steady data collected during the test included standard force and moment measurements, as well as wing, strut, nacelle, and body (fuselage) static pressures. These data were collected in a standard pitch-pause mode. Unsteady data captured in the test, collected in continuous pitch mode, included wing and strut dynamic pressures, accelerations, and strains. According to test data, previous concerns regarding critical buffet onset on the strut (at low vehicle lift coefficient) and in the wing-strut channel have been mitigated. Buffet onset on the TTBW appears to follow conventional wing-induced buffet onset mechanisms. However, the critical station where buffet onset first occurs has moved inboard to the wing-strut juncture span location (55-60% span) from the typical ~70% span location. Test data obtained by unsteady pressure transducers provided a good match to expected buffet onset modes. An assessment of different tools and methodologies for predicting buffet onset was conducted. Reasonable agreement was found for buffet boundary predictions between most of the methods examined when using a forward trip location, with the greatest discrepancies from the pitching moment break and trailing edge pressure divergence methods. When an aft trip location was used the buffet boundary predictions diverged more significantly from unsteady pressure measurements. In addition, good agreement between the buffet onset trends were found when the Reynolds number, configuration, or spanload was changed.

strut↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Parametric Study of the Forward Attachment Geometry for the Space Launch System Next Generation Booster

Launch vehicle transonic buffet environments can generate large dynamic structural loads and vibratory responses. For the Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle, the highest transonic buffet environments have been observed in the multibody region between the core and solid rocket boosters, particularly downstream of the booster forward attachment. The buffet environment is particularly sensitive to the outer mold line (OML) of the forward attachment, and even relatively minor geometry changes can have large impacts on buffet and other aerodynamic environments. The SLS program is redesigning the booster for the Block 2 vehicle to support updated mission goals. This redesign necessitated changes in the forward attachment geometry, which raised concerns about the buffet and vibroacoustic environments. A preliminary study was conducted that developed multiple forward attachment geometries that satisfied the programmatic requirements, but the aerodynamic environment impacts were unclear. In March 2022, a wind-tunnel test was conducted at the NASA Ames 11- by 11-foot Transonic Wind Tunnel to study these environments generated from each of the configurations in order to select the most viable candidate. This paper will discuss this test campaign, the results from the parametric study, as well as general observations regarding OML features that impact the buffet environment. Buffet environments will be presented and compared for each configuration and comparisons presented where applicable.

buffet↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Parametric Study of the Forward Attachment Geometry for the Space Launch System Next Generation Booster

Launch vehicle transonic buffet environments can generate large dynamic structural loads and vibratory responses. For the Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle, the highest transonic buffet environments have been observed in the multibody region between the core and solid rocket boosters, particularly downstream of the booster forward attachment. The buffet environment is particularly sensitive to the outer mold line (OML) of the forward attachment, and even relatively minor geometry changes can have large impacts on buffet and other aerodynamic environments. The SLS program is redesigning the booster for the Block 2 vehicle to support updated mission goals. This redesign necessitated changes in the forward attachment geometry, which raised concerns about the buffet and vibroacoustic environments. A preliminary study was conducted that developed multiple forward attachment geometries that satisfied the programmatic requirements, but the aerodynamic environment impacts were unclear. In March 2022, a wind-tunnel test was conducted at the NASA Ames 11- by 11-foot Transonic Wind Tunnel to study these environments generated from each of the configurations in order to select the most viable candidate. This paper will discuss this test campaign, the results from the parametric study, as well as general observations regarding OML features that impact the buffet environment. Buffet environments will be presented and compared for each configuration and comparisons presented where applicable.

buffet↗