SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “vitrification facility”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2019

Overcoming Technical Challenges During Demolition of the West Valley Vitrification Facility - 19387

In February 2019, CH2M Hill BWXT West Valley, LLC will complete demolition and waste disposal of the first vitrification facility in the history of the United States. This project marked the largest and most complex radiological demolition project undertaken at the U.S. Department of Energy-led West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) to date. Provisions put in place during demolition monitored for and mitigated contamination migration during demolition. The work was carried out in a well-planned manner to address specific areas where higher levels of radiological activity were known to exist and where difficult and oversized equipment removal or sensitive items required special handling. Inaccessible contamination on ceiling mounted equipment, controlled removal of two massive steel shield doors, intact removal of lead glass shield windows and a confined demolition boundary area were some of the limiting factors that required special consideration during demolition. This paper contains a discussion of planning and implementation of special handling techniques utilized during some of the more difficult evolutions encountered during open-air demolition of the Vitrification Facility. The work techniques, provisions to mitigate inclement weather and lessons learned have been incorporated into the planning for follow-on radiological demolition work at the WVDP. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Follow-on Report of Analysis of Approaches to Supplemental Treatment of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation (Vol. I)

The Hanford Site, in southeast Washington State, is preparing to disposition approximately 56,000,000 gallons (56 Mgal) of radioactive and chemically hazardous wastes currently stored in underground tanks at the site. Tank wastes will be divided into a high-activity fraction and a low-activity fraction for subsequent treatment and disposition. A waste processing and treatment facility, the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), will include the high-level waste (HLW) vitrification facility (WTP HLW Vitrification Facility) for immobilizing the high-activity fraction and a low-activity waste (LAW) vitrification facility (WTP LAW Vitrification Facility) for immobilizing the low-activity fraction. Both facilities will use vitrification technology to immobilize the Hanford tank wastes in a glass waste form. The volume of LAW to be treated and disposed of following waste retrieval and WTP operations will exceed the planned processing capacity of the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility. ORP-11242,-River Protection Project System Plan, estimates a shortfall in LAW treatment capacity of approximately 56 Mgal, approximately 50% of the projected LAW volume. To maintain the planned tank waste processing mission schedule, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will require additional LAW treatment capacity (termed “supplemental LAW”) external to the WTP process. LAW must be solidified by a treatment technology before the waste can be permanently disposed of in an approved DOE on-site disposal facility or a commercial (state or U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC-licensed]) off-site mixed low-level waste disposal facility. A decision on the approach to supplemental LAW treatment, processing, and disposal has not yet been made

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Follow-on Report of Analysis of Approaches to Supplemental Treatment of Low–Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation (Volumes I & II)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Follow-On Report of Analysis of Approaches to Supplemental Treatment of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation (Volumes I & II)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

Using Best Basis Inventory Data to Direct Strategies for Real-Time Monitoring of Hanford High Level Waste

The proposed Direct Feed High Level Waste (DFHLW) approach for processing high-level tank waste at Hanford is intended to reduce processing time by bypassing the Pretreatment Facility and transferring waste directly from the tank farm to the WTP HLW vitrification facility. This processing strategy could reduce or eliminate the washing and leaching steps that would have occurred in the Pretreatment facility. Operation of the vitrification facility is subject to chemical and radiological limits protecting safety (e.g. Waste Acceptance Criteria, or WACs) and process quality (e.g. Process Control Limits, or PCLs). Without washing and leaching, there is a greater risk of exceeding the WACs and PCLs. Hanford process engineers have devised blending strategies based on known chemical and radiological composition, volumes, and solids loadings of individual layers within each waste tank. These blending campaigns succeed in predicting a processing strategy that does not exceed the WACs and PCLs. However, the calculations do not ascribe uncertainties to the tank analysis data, quantities of material taken from the tanks to make the blend, or potential for mixing of layers within tanks. In order to confirm that a process strategy is working, it would be advantageous to have inline or at-line analytical instrumentation installed in the processing facilities that deliver measurement results in real time.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Iodine Distribution During Evaporation of Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Direct Feed Low Activity Waste Effluent Management Facility Simulant

The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low Activity Waste (LAW) vitrification facility will generate an aqueous condensate recycle stream from the off-gas system. The baseline plan for disposition of this stream during full WTP operations is to send it to the WTP Pretreatment Facility, where it will be blended with LAW, concentrated by evaporation, and recycled to the LAW vitrification facility. However, during the Direct Feed LAW (DFLAW) scenario, planned disposition of this stream involves concentrating the condensate in a new evaporator at the Effluent Management Facility (EMF) and returning it to the LAW melter. The LAW melter condensate stream will contain components, e.g. halides and sulfates, that are volatile at melter temperatures, have limited solubility in glass waste forms, and present a material corrosion concern. Further, some minor constituents in the melter condensate, such as volatile organic compounds and iodine, have been found to be at least partially volatile in the EMF. The condensate from the EMF will be sent to the Hanford Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). The presence of some recalcitrant organics and iodine, as 129I, are expected to be problematic in the ETF. In order to better predict and prepare for the distribution of organics and 129I in the flowsheet, it is key to understand their chemistry and experimentally determine their behavior during evaporation. To do this, modeling and testing were performed to examine the speciation of iodine under relevant conditions, as well as determine partitioning of iodine and the organics in the EMF evaporator. This overall program examines the potential treatment and immobilization of the LAW melter condensate stream to enable alternative disposal. The objective of this task was to (1) perform modeling to determine the speciation and fate of iodine species, (2) prepare a simulant of the LAW Melter Off-gas Condensate expected during DFLAW operations, (3) spike in the key volatile organics and non-radioactive iodine, and (4) demonstrate evaporation in order to predict the final composition of the effluents from the EMF evaporator to aid in planning for their disposition. The results of the modeling of iodine speciation indicate that the iodine is expected to remain in the evaporator pot as iodide and possibly iodate ion if the pH is raised to 11.5-12, which is the planned condition for the EMF. Experimental testing confirmed that the iodide remained in the evaporator concentrate and was below detection limits in all condensate and knock-out pot samples, indicating it was not volatile. The organic nitrile compounds that were added to the simulant were absent from the evaporator feed solution, either lost through evaporation, or more likely, decomposition. The acetone and methylene chloride were below the target values in the feed and condensate samples, and were presumably lost to evaporation or decomposition.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Solid-liquid Separation Testing for the Remediation of Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Low Activity Waste Melter Off-Gas Condensate

The Low Activity Waste (LAW) vitrification facility at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will generate an aqueous condensate stream (LAW Off-Gas Condensate) from the off-gas system. The plan for disposition of this stream during Direct Feed LAW operations is to transfer it to the Effluent Management Facility (EMF), where it will be concentrated by evaporation and recycled to the LAW vitrification facility again. The primary reason to recycle this stream is so that the semi-volatile 99Tc isotope eventually becomes incorporated into the glass. However, this stream also contains non-radioactive salt components that are problematic in the melter, so diversion of this stream to another process would eliminate recycling of these salts and would enable simplified operation of the LAW melter and the Pretreatment Facilities. This diversion from recycling this stream within WTP would have the effect of decreasing the quantity of glass waste produced by allowing further increases in waste loading, resulting in a shortened LAW vitrification mission duration. The concept being tested here involves selectively removing the 99 Tc so that the decontaminated aqueous stream, with the problematic salts, can be disposed as a different waste form and avoid reprocessing through vitrification.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Tank Side Cesium Removal System Project and Technology Maturation Program - 20101

Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is the Tank Operating Contractor (TOC) for the U.S. Department of Energy-Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) on the Hanford Site. The Hanford Site stores an estimated 56 million gallons of mixed radioactive and chemically hazardous waste in large underground tanks. WRPS is in the process of designing the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system to produce a Low Activity Waste (LAW) feed from existing mixed Hanford tank waste. The LAW will be transferred to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW Vitrification Facility, where it will be immobilized in a durable glass waste form for disposal. The TSCR Project demonstrates a tank-side treatment system for providing feed to the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility. This system removes undissolved solids and cesium from tank waste supernatant using non-elutable ion exchange media to meet the applicable waste acceptance criteria for the WTP. In support of the project, technology testing has been performed to answer design questions and reduce risk. The project scope and technology testing approach are presented. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Tank Side Cesium Removal System Project and Technology Maturation Program - 19519

Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is the Tank Operating Contractor (TOC) for the U.S. Department of Energy-Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) on the Hanford Site. The Hanford Site stores an estimated 56 million gallons of mixed radioactive and chemically hazardous waste in large underground tanks. WRPS is in the process of designing the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system to produce Low Activity Waste (LAW) from Hanford tank waste. The LAW will be transferred to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW Vitrification Facility, where the hazardous constituents in the LAW will be immobilized in a durable glass waste form for disposal. The TSCR Project demonstrates a tank-side treatment system for providing feed to the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility. This system removes cesium from supernatant tank waste using non-elutable cesium ion exchange media to meet the applicable waste acceptance criteria for the WTP. In support of the project, a tailored Technology Maturation/Testing Plan (TMP) has been developed to identify principal Technology Elements (TEs) for the proposed process, designate Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), identify gaps in the existing knowledge base and identify the necessary activities to mature the technologies for successful deployment of TSCR. The project scope and technology maturation approach are presented. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Small to Full Height Scale Comparisons of Cesium Ion Exchange Performance with Crystalline Silicotitanate

The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Site houses 56 million gallons of high-level radioactive waste generated from plutonium production from 1944 to 1988. The supernatant waste, currently stored in underground tanks, is intended to be vitrified following filtration and 137 Cs removal at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification Facility. The WTP Pretreatment Facility will not be operational for several years. The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system is a technology demonstration that will remove cesium from tank waste supernate to support directly feeding LAW to the vitrification facility. The 137 Cs removal is important to meet the WTP LAW contract specification and ultimately for creating a contact-handled waste form. The waste acceptance criteria (WAC) limit for the WTP LAW Facility is <3.18E-5 Ci 137 Cs per mole Na. The TSCR system is skid mounted and employs two key technologies: dead end filtration for solids removal and ion exchange (IX) for cesium removal. Filtration is necessary to protect the functionality of the IX columns. The IX process utilizes sodium form crystalline silicotitanate (CST) IX media produced by UOP Honeywell, LLC (Des Plaines, IL) under the product name IONSIV R9140-B, 18 x 50 mesh, in a lead-lag-polish column configuration. Each column contains a CST bed height of 92 inches and a volume of approximately 157 gallons of CST IX media. The full-scale TSCR operation will run at a residence time of 1.9 bed volumes (BV)/h, which results in a superficial velocity of 7.3 cm/min and a flowrate of ~5 gal/min. Column testing at small (2.5% of the full bed height), medium (12% of the full bed height), and full-height scales has been previously conducted to evaluate process variables and scale up performance of Cs exchange onto the CST. Cesium load performances from various sieve cuts at the small scale indicated that a 30-mesh sieve cut be tested to determine if it better reflects the 12% and full-height column performances at the small scale. Two process flowrates were tested in the small-column configuration with <30-mesh CST and simulant solutions. These tests were compared to full-height column tests at the same residence times to assess CST particle size effect on column scaling. Table S.1 summarizes the observed column performance determined for the two flowrates juxtaposed to the previous work with 5.6 M Na simulant at higher scales (used as benchmarks). The WAC breakthroughs between the small and full-height tests at 1.3 BV/h differed by ~59 BVs. The WAC breakthroughs for small, medium, and full-height tests at 1.8 BV/h were consistent at 240 BVs. The 50% Cs breakthroughs were nominally equivalent for all column tests. The common transition zones and onsets of Cs breakthrough at the 1.8 BV/h tests indicated that the Cs mass transfers were equivalent and thus the <30-mesh CST Cs load performance at the small scale successfully modeled that of the full-height system. It is recommended that the <30-mesh CST be used in subsequent 10-mL CST bed tests.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2024

Glass Formulation and Testing with RPP-WTP HLW Simulants (Final Report)

This report presents the results from HLW glass formulation work that was conducted at the Vitreous State Laboratory of The Catholic University of America during Part B1 of the RPP-WTP Project (formally known as TWRS-P) in support of the Privatization contractor, BNFL, Inc. Glass formulation development is required to provide data that are essential for design of the vitrification facility in the near term and for safe and reliable operation of that facility in the longer-term. These data also form the bases from which contractually and technically acceptable immobilized high-level waste (IHLW) products will be devised. Glass formulation therefore impacts many aspects of the vitrification facility design, overall process economics, and contractual compliance. As an integral part of the overall system design, development of glass formulations requires input from many sources including tank waste characterization, pretreatment process definition, flow sheet development, and processing schedules. Accordingly, the glass formulation effort must be responsive to new information as the facility design basis evolves.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Impact of Crystalline Silicotitanate Particle Size on Cesium Removal Efficiency

Washington River Protection Solutions is working on a Tank-Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system to remove Cs from Hanford tank waste supernate. Removal of 137 Cs from tank waste supernate by TSCR results in a low-activity waste (LAW) form that can be fed directly to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW vitrification facility, where the supernate can be vitrified into a glass form. Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media, manufactured by Honeywell UOP, LLC (product IONSIV TM R9140-B), was selected for use as the ion exchange media to remove Cs at TSCR. The particle size used in testing is expected to impact the kinetic performance of the ion exchange media. Therefore, two single-column systems were tested with CST Lot 2002009604. One column contained <25 mesh sieve cut fraction and the other column contained <35 mesh sieve cut fraction. Flowrate through both test systems was adjusted to match the CST contact time expected for the full-scale operation, i.e., matched bed volumes per hour (BV/h) at 1.83 BV/h. The feed was processed downflow through the columns until ~1000 BVs of feed were processed. The waste acceptance criteria (WAC) limit for the WTP LAW vitrification facility is <3.18E-5 Ci 137 Cs per mole Na. For a tank waste containing 156 µCi/mL 137 Cs and 5.6 M Na, up to 0.114% of the influent 137 Cs concentration may be delivered to the WTP (based on 137 Cs content in AP-107 tank waste); this required a Cs decontamination factor of 876. The WAC limit was used as one of the relevant process parameters, along with the 50% breakthrough point, Cs loading per gram of CST, and the mass transfer zone.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Technical Gaps in Hanford High-Level Waste Solids Settling Behavior and Settling Time Evaluation for Direct Feed High-Level Waste (DFHLW) Operations

Settling of high-level waste (HLW) solids in process vessels is a key conceptual process step in providing HLW feed directly to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) HLW Vitrification Facility. Direct Feed High-Level Waste (DFHLW) is a potential approach to initiating HLW vitrification prior to completing of the WTP Pretreatment Facility. Settling would be used with subsequent supernatant decant to concentrate HLW feed. To support planning for DFHLW, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) requested support from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to evaluate the current data set available to predict the time needed for HLW solids to settle, to identify gaps in the understanding and predictive capability of HLW solids waste settling times, and to provide scoping estimates of the potential settling time. Eight technical gaps were identified for predicting settling times and characteristics of the formed sediment layers including: Gap 1: In-Tank Settling Rates Faster than Settling of Laboratory Samples, Gap 2: Effect of Sludge Leaching/Washing on Predicted Settling Times, Gap 3: Predicting Waste Settling from Waste Chemistry (Waste Type), Gap 4: Predicting Waste Settling from Particle Size and Density Distributions (PSDDs), Gap 5: Insufficient Laboratory and In-Tank Settling Data to Represent Hanford Waste, Gap 6: Methods for Real-Time, In-Tank Tracking of Settling, Gap 7: Prediction of Sediment Erosion Resistance as a Function of Settling Time, and Gap 8: Prediction of Sediment Solids Content as a Function of Settling Time. In addition to the data gaps, an overarching observation of the settling rate and settled layer data is the significant variation in behavior. At similar solids concentrations, settling rates can vary by as much as 3 orders of magnitude depending on the source waste tank, and significantly different settling rates are noted between laboratory and in situ tests for the same waste tank. The range of average solids concentration in existing HLW sediment, which may have been quiescent for decades, can vary from less than 7 wt% to greater than 74 wt% solids. The shear strengths (or yield stresses) measured on laboratory samples range from less than 27 Pa to greater than 6400 Pa. These variations can challenge process planning for the application of a settle/decant process for DFHLW. This report describes the significance of the gaps to the settle/decant process and presents uncertainties by way of examples. Potential technical approaches for resolving these gaps are described and the estimated difficulty in resolving these gaps is evaluated. Based on the significance of the gap and the difficulty of resolution, recommendations are made to address specific gaps. Scoping estimates of the potential settling times for DFHLW solids have been made based on the existing data set with its associated gaps. Depending on the process vessel depth and final sediment concentration, substantial fractions of the scoping estimate results for settling times for characterized HLW exceed the 2-week period that has been previously assumed for process planning. There is also significant disparity, potentially greater than a factor of 5000 difference, in the estimated settling times depending on process vessel depth and final sediment solid concentration. This variation in results underscores the significance of the identified gaps and uncertainties with respect to process planning for utilizing settle/decant operations for DFHLW.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Robust and High-Waste Loaded Glass Formulations for Hanford Low-Activity Waste - 19050

The Hanford Low-Activity Waste (LAW) vitrification facility will receive LAW batches with abruptly changing compositions that span relatively broad ranges. In particular, the concentration ratios of sodium-to-sulfate, -chloride, -chromate, -phosphate, -potassium, and -aluminate create challenges in glass formulation. Glass compositions that simultaneously satisfy several processability, product quality, and composition constraints with sufficient confidence must be formulated for each LAW batch in near-realtime to enable desired throughput. A method for developing glass compositions while maximizing the waste loading and the process robustness was developed. This method compiled the glass composition-property data collected over nearly two decades, primarily by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, and Savannah River National Laboratory, in support of both the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant project and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Enhanced Waste Glass project. These data were used to develop models that link the melter feed composition to the resulting glass properties. Mathematical constructs were developed to optimize glass compositions for each waste batch in real-time that will simultaneously satisfy processability, product quality, and composition constraints with sufficient statistical confidence. Property prediction and various process uncertainties were reflected in the formulation. The formulation approach directly lends itself to adjustment of glass formulation to achieve program goals. This presentation will summarize the formulation approach and supporting data. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Impact of dilution-induced precipitates on the filtration of Hanford liquid tank wastes

To facilitate its vitrification, a portion of the radioactive wastes currently stored at the Hanford Site will be staged and treated using tank-side operations to render their chemistry compliant with the requirements of Hanford’s low-activity waste vitrification facility. Initial sampling of staged feeds indicates that process-water dilution, used to reduce waste feed sodium content to levels acceptable for vitrification (5–6 M Na), may cause precipitation of fine, difficult to settle solids that could affect downstream tank-side filtration and ion-exchange. However, dilution-induced precipitation has not been demonstrated under controlled, rigorous laboratory conditions. This paper presents a set of qualitative and quantitative assessments of dilution-induced precipitation using a nonradioactive, Hanford Tank AP-105 simulated waste. Further, these studies found that dilution of AP-farm waste simulants induced precipitation of up to 150 ppm solids, regardless of whether dilution was done with process water (which contains, among other analytes, naturally occurring Ca and Mg) or deionized water. Naturally occurring process-water analytes appeared to accelerate the rate (and possibly extent) of precipitation. Filtration of diluted waste simulants also found that the precipitated solids challenged prototypic tank-side filter operations; however, the impact to filtration performance was readily managed through waste staging settle/decant operations.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Waste Glass Property Database and Data Qualification Plan

The U.S. Department of Energy vitrification facilities currently employ glass property-composition models to ensure processability of waste streams and acceptability of the final glass products. The efficiency (e.g., process flexibility, reduced down time, and reduced cost) of waste vitrification is directly tied to the size of the waste processing envelope. To increase the size of the processing envelope, a larger database was developed. The database will improve the prediction accuracy of glass properties, leading to higher waste loadings, higher waste throughput, broader process flexibility, and reduced mission life. Some of the data in this expanded database has insufficient quality assurance (QA) rigor for use in nuclear facility operation and glass qualification. A plan was developed to qualify high-value data under the appropriate QA rigor for use at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant’s High-Level Waste (HLW) Facility. This qualification plan first compares the data coverage over the composition region of interest to Hanford HLW by property. Those studies that significantly improve the data coverage in the Hanford HLW glass composition region were prioritized for qualification activities. Qualification methods including QA equivalence, peer review, data corroboration, and confirmatory testing have been assigned to each high-priority study.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2024

Numerical modeling of Joule heated ceramic melter

Computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer models of waste glass melters are being developed to support the vitrification campaign at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) as part of the United States nuclear waste stewardship and environmental protection programs. The WTP mission aims to achieve the stable and durable processing of vitrified waste in the safest, most efficient, and economical manner possible. Hanford’s tank waste is far more complex and varied than the waste treated by other vitrification facilities and both startup and long-term operational challenges are likely to be even greater than prior experience has shown. There are thousands of different waste compositions, which makes processing the waste a complex and challenging task. Models of test melters, pilot-scale, and full-scale melters have been developed to provide understanding and insight into the various physical and chemical phenomena occurring during vitrification. So the results of these modeling activities will be used to support the WTP operations to process legacy nuclear waste into a stable form for disposal.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

FY22 Development of Improved Grout Waste Forms for Supplemental Low Activity Waste Treatment

About 54 to 56 million gallons of radioactive mixed waste is currently stored in underground tanks at the United States Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford site in the State of Washington. This waste will be separated into low- and high activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High Level Waste (IHLW) products for subsequent disposal. The ILAW product will be disposed of in an engineered facility at the Hanford site while the IHLW product is designed for acceptance into a national deep geological disposal facility for high level nuclear waste. Treatment of the tank waste will take place in the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), which is under construction. However, since the WTP Low Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification Facility was not designed to process the entire inventory of Hanford LAW, up to half of the retrieved Hanford LAW will require supplemental immobilization. Immobilizing LAW in a cementitious waste form known as Cast Stone has been investigated as a possible candidate supplemental immobilization technology

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗