Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Pease, Leonard F.

Publications and source records attributed to Pease, Leonard F..

Recovery of Oxpure 612C-50 Coconut Carbon Particles Using Bump Arrays

Cyanide is used to leach gold from crushed ore (solid matrix) into a gold cyanide solution. The gold is extracted from the cyanide solution by adsorption onto activated carbon. The gold extraction process occurs when the activated coconut carbon is placed into tanks that contain the gold cyanide solution either in a batch process or into a continuous flow circuit. The coconut carbon is then removed from the solution for gold recovery. The use of the mesofluidic separation system (a deterministic lateral displacement system) can significantly reduce costs and waste generated from the process of removing the coconut carbon from the solution. In the coconut carbon recovery process used at many gold mines in Nevada, the gold is attached to carbon particles that are still in the cyanide liquor. The mesofluidic system can rapidly remove the gold bearing carbon particles from the cyanide liquor quickly and with no operating costs. The benefits include: • Reduce operational costs related to filtration and hydro-cyclones • Reduced acid usage for the elution gold stripping phase as only 25% of the fluids will follow the carbon particles to the final express lane when two mesofluidic systems are used in series This alternative particle removal techniques would be advantageous. A promising technique for removing larger particles from slurries is mesofluidic separation, similar to deterministic lateral displacement arrays or “bump” arrays [1] but operates at much larger flow rates. As described by Pease, et al. [2], “Bump arrays in deterministic lateral displacement devices separate large particles from small particles using arrays of staggered posts. Large particles, defined as those with radii larger than the distance between the edge of a post and the stagnation streamline from the next downstream post, must bump toward one side of the device, whereas particles smaller than this distance slalom from entrance to exit without net lateral displacement.” Unlike filters or sieves, the posts in the arrays that cause separation do not block or occlude particle flow but work because particles go around the posts. Unlike hydrocyclones separation, separation is not driven by particle density, because gravitational forces are unimportant to mesofluidic separation. Burns, et al., and Pease, et al., have shown that particles may be separated from complex suspensions, under turbulent flow conditions, and at industrially important flow rates [3-5]. They have also recently shown that mesofluidic devices may be arranged in series to increase separation performance [6]. In this paper, we evaluate the mesofluidic system for the separation of commercial OxPure GR 612 Charred Coconut shell particles as a proof of principle test for the rapid separation using the 1500 micron cut mesofluidic separator. We first describe the experimental system and conditions. We then present the experimental results. [1] Huang, L.R., E.C. Cox, R.H. Austin, J.C. Sturm. 2004. Continuous particle separation through deterministic lateral displacement. Science, 304, 987–990. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094567. [2] Pease L.F., J.A. Bamberger, C.A. Burns, and M.J. Minette. 2021. Large Particle Separation from Non-Newtonian Slurries using Bump Arrays. In Proceedings of the ASME 2021 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting FEDSM2021-65904, V003T08A023. New York, New York: ASME. doi:10.1115/FEDSM2021-65904 [3] Burns C.A., T.G. Veldman, J. Serkowski, R.C. Daniel, X.-Y. Yu, M.J. Minette, L.F. Pease. 2021. Mesofluidic separation versus dead-end filtration. Separation and Purification Technology, 254, 117256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117256. [4] Pease L.F., J.E. Serkowski, T.G. Veldman, J. Williams, X.-Y. Yu, M.J. Minette, J.A. Bamberger, C.A. Burns. 2021. Can Bump Arrays Separate Particles from Turbulent Flows?. In Proceedings of the ASME 2021 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting FEDSM2021-67696, V003T08A024. New York, New York: ASME. doi:10.11

mesofluidic separation, slurry, bump array↗

Critical Shear Stresses for Erosion from Yield Stresses

The critical shear stress for erosion is important in many fields of engineering and science that involve suspension of particles from settled particle beds. However, determining the critical shear stress for erosion remains intricate, particularly where interparticle forces play a key role. Because these forces vary widely (Pease, et al., 2019), a more convenient means of estimating the critical shear stress for erosion would be advantageous. Here we evaluate the assertion that critical shear stresses for erosion may be derived from yield stresses for nominally cohesive particle beds across the full range of particle Reynolds numbers. The critical shear stress for erosion for non-cohesive particle beds may be estimated from the Shields diagrams or the analytical expressions from conservation of force about a particle at the interface. However, equivalent diagrams for cohesive particle beds have remained elusive. In 1992, pioneering analysis by Dade included the influence of the van der Waals force in particle forces balances to show that the critical shear stresses for erosion may be related to yield stresses subject to the limitations of small particle Reynolds numbers, flat particle beds, uniform particle diameters, and negligible electrostatic forces. Here we relax these restrictions. We find that the critical shear stress for erosion does relate to the yield stresses in a linear fashion for sufficiently large yield stresses. A criterion is developed to determine when the yield stresses may be important. Pease LF, AJ Fuher, JA Bamberger, and MJ Minette. 2024. Shields Diagrams for Cohesive Particle Beds. Manuscript. Dade WB, ARM Nowell and PA Jumars. 1992. “Predicting erosion resistance of muds.” Marine Geology, 105 (1992) 285-297.

shear stress, erosion, yield stress, slurry, settl↗

Advanced Mineral Extraction and Water Processing: Application Development of Mesofluidic Separation Technology

This project explored the development of mesofluidic devices and methods to provide a range of new capabilities with a focus on selective mineral extraction and cost-effective water treatment systems. Mineral separation and water treatment technologies are typically slow, bulky, expensive, time and energy intensive processes. This leads to very large, expensive processing plants that are often inefficient and produce low quality products and large volumes of waste. Technologies used in mineral extraction and water treatment have changed little in the last 50-100 years. The new technology, based upon mesofluidic separation devices, could disruptively change the state of the art and alter long established economics. The new technologies explored will provide systems with much smaller footprints, higher throughput, modular components easily integrated into existing industrial processes and plants, lower cost, and novel separation capabilities. The results from this effort contributed to a wide range of new capabilities and numerous inventions disclosures.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Targeted Particle Fractionation Technologies: Proof of Concept

Most methods of particle-size analysis involve particle fractionation which, is often done by filtration or the use of screens. This paper provides proof of concept testing for new in-pipe particle fractionation technologies that can be used at laboratory to industrial scales. These technologies are extensions of recent advancements in bump arrays as well as testing of new inline angled-to-the-flow slats, and advanced boycott-based Avalanche separation technologies. Experiments were conducted for three targeted particle fractionation technologies to evaluate the in-pipe removal of oversized sands in Newtonian slurries prior to the introduction of bump arrays. The mesofluidic system uses an array of staggered posts as configured in a bump array for Newtonian slurry conditions. The methods and results of these experiments are described in this paper. This information could be applied in most industrial and laboratory systems to rapidly remove oversized particles from a flowing slurry.

slurry, solids removal, particle fractionation, bu↗

Comparing Experimental Results for Large Particle Separation from Non-Newtonian Slurries Using Full and Tapered Bump Arrays

To separate particles from carrier fluids arrays of staggered posts inserted into the flow stream can be employed. The smaller particles follow the flow stream while the larger particles move laterally to one side. During flow, the concentration of particulate increases in one direction and decreases in the other crosswise direction. This technique separates the particles from the carrier fluid. Experiments using a slurry with non-Newtonian rheology were conducted to evaluate large particle separation from the non-Newtonian carrier fluid using bump arrays. The bentonite kaolin clay slurry with non-Newtonian rheology was spiked with large diameter inert glass particles. Experiments with flow through lateral displacement arrays evaluated the performance of particle separation using two array configurations: a full array with all posts and a tapered array with posts removed in a triangular portion of the array past the rows of anticipated particle of separation. The posts are staggered posts to promote particle segregation to one side of the flow channel. Using this type of array for removing particles from non-Newtonian yield stress slurries is novel and we present unique results. In this paper, the performance of full and tapered arrays are compared. These results have many industrial applications including removing particles from slurries of nuclear waste. Large particle removal is an important step in waste processing.

slurry, solids removal, deterministic lateral disp↗

Gravitational vortex disruption in mesofluidic separators

Typically, bump array devices separate submicrometer particles where gravitational effects remain small. However, as particle size increases from a few micrometers to hundreds of micrometers, gravitational effects become important and settling may induce vortex formation. Here, this article shows under laminar flow that these vortices suffice to disrupt flow fields, frustrating particle separation. The limiting diameter, above which vortices do form, is determined, and the dependence of the limiting diameter on viscosity, particle properties, and separator orientation is quantified.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

CO 2 -Responsive Fracturing Fluids for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (Final Report)

Our group has recently developed StimuFrac, a non-toxic stimuli-responsive fracturing fluid consisting of a CO 2 -reactive polymer which has shown at the lab-scale to consistently fracture rock cores at significantly lower net pressures in a range of representative geothermal pressure/temperature conditions. However, until now the mechanism/s responsible for more effective fracturing, of critical importance to optimize fracturing performance as well as strategize injection methodologies for field deployment, was not understood. In this document, we report (1) on the two main mechanisms responsible for fracturing rock at lower net pressures with StimuFrac; (2) the phase behavior of StimuFrac/CO 2 under geothermal wellbore conditions; and (3) based on high-temperature true triaxial stimulations, detailed evidence that StimuFrac/CO 2 is the best performing stimulation fluid under EGS T/P conditions as compared to water, waterless CO 2 , and CO 2 /water fracturing fluids. This is because i) it requires significantly lower volumes of CO 2 due to its reduced leak off into the formation by the crosslinked polymer solution; ii) large fractures can be generated reproducibly at both low and high CO 2 injection flow rates, and iii) the reversible (previously reported) viscosity increase of StimuFrac could be beneficial to transport proppants when they become available for EGS. These results were particularly evident for hot nearly dry rock as well as partially and nearly fully water-saturated granitic rock. GTO requires StimuFrac to be evaluated in fully water-saturated rock to determine whether the above-described performance applies under these conditions. Since (1) GTO considers there is no enough evidence for Sa different StimuFrac formulation to work below 90C (where full water-saturation in an open system is possible) and (2) no polyaxial loading frame larger than a few centimeters that can do hydraulic fracturing tests while maintaining the rock sample fully saturated with water at 200 C exists; PNNL concludes that the only way to determine if StimuFrac represents an advanced fracturing fluid alternative for EGS, is to perform a stimulation in an actual EGS reservoir.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗