Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 22121618

Dose calculation for electron therapy using an improved LBR method

Gebreamlak, Wondesen T.·Alkhatib, Hassaan A.·Tedeschi, David J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Purpose: To calculate the percentage depth dose (PDD) of any irregularly shaped electron beam using a modified lateral build-up ratio (LBR) method.Methods: Percentage depth dose curves were measured using 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV electron beam energies for applicator cone sizes of 6 Multiplication-Sign 6, 10 Multiplication-Sign 10, 14 Multiplication-Sign 14, and 20 Multiplication-Sign 20 cm{sup 2}. Circular cutouts for each cone were prepared from 2.0 cm diameter to the maximum possible size for each cone. In addition, three irregular cutouts were prepared.Results: The LBR for each circular cutout was calculated from the measured PDD curve using the open field of the 14 Multiplication-Sign 14 cm{sup 2} cone as the reference field. Using the LBR values and the radius of the circular cutouts, the corresponding lateral spread parameter [{sigma}{sub R}(z)] of the electron shower was calculated. Unlike the commonly accepted assumption that {sigma}{sub R}(z) is independent of cutout size, it is shown that its value increases linearly with circular cutout size (R). Using this characteristic of the lateral spread parameter, the PDD curves of irregularly shaped cutouts were calculated. Finally, the calculated PDD curves were compared with measured PDD curves.Conclusions: In this research, it is shown that the lateral spread parameter {sigma}{sub R}(z) increases with cutout size. For radii of circular cutout sizes up to the equilibrium range of the electron beam, the increase of {sigma}{sub R}(z) with the cutout size is linear. The percentage difference of the calculated PDD curve from the measured PDD data for irregularly shaped cutouts was under 1.0% in the region between the surface and therapeutic range of the electron beam. Similar results were obtained for four electron beam energies (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV)

Explore related subjects

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINEDEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONSDOSIMETRYELECTRON BEAMSELECTRONSMEV RANGE 01-10MEV RANGE 10-100RADIATION DOSESRADIOTHERAPYSURFACES

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gebreamlak, Wondesen T., Alkhatib, Hassaan A., Tedeschi, David J.. 2013-07-15. Dose calculation for electron therapy using an improved LBR method. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4810938

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Deep Learning enabled spectral energy conversion for in situ exposure measurements

A detector-specific deep learning (DL) approach is presented for spectra-to-exposure conversion using large-format sodium iodide (NaI(Tl)) detectors deployed for in situ environmental radiation measurements in emergency response scenarios. Accurate determination of exposure from NaI spectra is challenging due to poor energy resolution, partial energy absorption, and the strong sensitivity of traditionally deployed analytical conversion methods to calibrated source geometry and pre-deployment assumptions. Here, to address these limitations, a multi-layer perceptron model was trained on a hybrid in situ /Monte Carlo dataset constructed to span a broad range of photon energies, spatial extents, and realistic deployment variability, representative of general in situ emergency response conditions. The DL model was evaluated against commonly fielded analytical approaches under matched simulation conditions, including a single-factor method, a G-function method, and a modeled pressurized ion chamber (PIC) baseline. This study was intentionally computational in scope to enable controlled, like-for-like comparisons between conversion techniques while minimizing confounding real-world variability. Comparison to the modeled PIC provides contextual benchmarking and is not intended as a field inter-comparison with deployed instruments. Across the evaluated 20 keV to 3 MeV energy range, the DL approach consistently exhibited higher accuracy and reduced variance relative to the analytical methods against a deterministically calculated exposure. This may indicate improved robustness to spectral complexity without reliance on source-, geometric-, or spectral region-specific optimization. While results do not represent real-world validation, the presented work demonstrates that deep learning may effectively learn the nonlinear detector response-to-exposure relationship for asymmetric NaI(Tl) detectors and offers a promising pathway for improving in situ exposure estimation using spectroscopic systems already integrated into initial real-time emergency response operations.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2026

ACRRF High-Bay Dose Calculations using MCNP (Part B)

ACRR radiation outputs through vertical cavities have been documented in two reports. In Part B, the maximum dose from the unshielded central cavity, FREC-II, and NRS is calculated to inform the safety basis. The maximum dose is ≈1430 mrem per 300 MJ, or ≈40,930 rem/hr for full-power operation. A verification study completes the V&V of the modeling. Supplementary studies of variance-reduction techniques, model sensitivities, and aircraft dose above the ACRRF are included.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2026

Logistics for the 2026 International Nuclear Accident Dosimetry Intercomparison Exercise

The purpose of this exercise is to test participants’ nuclear accident dosimeters (NADs) and personnel to the requirements established by American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Health Physics Society (HPS) standard ANSI/HPS-N13.3-2013 (R2025) Dosimetry for Criticality Accidents. IER-634 is the second nuclear accident dosimetry exercise taking place at the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) in Bethesda, MD, a Department of Defense (DOD) facility. This effort continues use of the high-dose neutron exposure test bed maintained by the DOD and represents the continued collaboration between the DOD and Department of Energy (DOE). Previous work at AFRRI included a reactor characterization (IER 484) in 2023 and a nuclear accident intercomparison exercise (IER-602) in 2024.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗