Rotary Percussive Sample Acquisition Tool (SAT): Hardware Development and Testing
No abstract available
hardware development↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “hardware testing”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
In-Space Modular Assembly: An Approach for Reliable, Affordable, Precision Space Apertures
In-space assembly will revolutionize the creation, upgrade, and evolution of future space systems. In-space assembly represents an alternative deployment strategy that is not constrained by the requirement of using a single launch vehicle and enables a greater freedom of design for the initial emplacement of assets and their evolution over time. In-space assembly enables assets, such as observatories and science platforms, to become persistent, evolving over time like their terrestrial counterparts. Also, in-space assembly provides a direct path for utilization of in-space manufactured components designed exclusively for the operational environment. To highlight the advantages of an in-space assembly approach, the modular assembly of a 3 m to 4 m precision optical aperture based on thin meniscus technology coupled with structurally efficient TriTruss modules is presented. The 3 m to 4 m aperture stows compactly within two standard ride share slots (0.61 m by 0.71 m by 0.97 m). Placing instruments and the robotic system used for assembly in an adjacent ride share slot enables a capable observatory to be placed into service via modest ride share opportunities. Further, recent hardware assembly tests of similar modules and progress toward hardware tests to validate the overall architecture via diffraction limited testing will be summarized.
Design↗
In-Space Modular Assembly: An Approach for Reliable, Affordable, Precision Space Apertures
In-space assembly will revolutionize the creation, upgrade, and evolution of future space systems. In-space assembly represents an alternative deployment strategy that is not constrained by the requirement of using a single launch vehicle and enables a greater freedom of design for the initial emplacement of assets and their evolution over time. In-space assembly enables assets, such as observatories and science platforms, to become persistent, evolving over time like their terrestrial counterparts. Also, in-space assembly provides a direct path for utilization of in-space manufactured components designed exclusively for the operational environment. To highlight the advantages of an in-space assembly approach, the modular assembly of a 3 m to 4 m precision optical aperture based on thin meniscus technology coupled with structurally efficient TriTruss modules is presented. The 3 m to 4 m aperture stows compactly within two standard ride share slots (0.61 m by 0.71 m by 0.97 m). Placing instruments and the robotic system used for assembly in an adjacent ride share slot enables a capable observatory to be placed into service via modest ride share opportunities. Further, recent hardware assembly tests of similar modules and progress toward hardware tests to validate the overall architecture via diffraction limited testing will be summarized.
Design↗
New Approaches in Force-Limited Vibration Testing of Flight Hardware
To qualify flight hardware for random vibration environments the following methods are used to limit the loads in the aerospace industry: (1) Response limiting and notching (2) Simple TDOF model (3) Semi-empirical force limits (4) Apparent mass, etc. and (5) Impedance method. In all these methods attempts are made to remove conservatism due to the mismatch in impedances between the test and the flight configurations of the hardware that are being qualified. Assumption is the hardware interfaces have correlated responses. A new method that takes into account the un-correlated hardware interface responses are described in this presentation.
Random Vibration↗
Prototype hardware design and testing of the global common module for the global trigger subsystem of the ATLAS phase-II upgrade
We report the High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC) will deliver more than ten times the integrated luminosity of the previous runs combined. Meeting its stricter throughput requirements poses new challenges to the Trigger and Data Acquisition (TDAQ) systems of the LHC experiments. Introduced in the framework of the ATLAS experiment’s HL upgrade, the Global Trigger (GT) is a new subsystem which will perform offline-like algorithms on full-granularity calorimeter data. The implementation of the GT’s functionality is firmware-focused and is composed of three layers: multiplexing (or data aggregating), global event processing, and demultiplexing interface to the central trigger processor. Each layer will be composed of several, similar nodes, hosted on replicas of identical hardware, the Global Common Module (GCM), an ATCA front board which is designed to be adopted throughout the entire GT subsystem. This article proceeds from the TWEPP 2021 conference and presents the GCM hardware design, performed in 2020, and focuses on some key results of its extensive testing performed in 2021.
46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
Development of a Converter Based Microgrid Test Platform
To overcome the limitations of digital simulation (numerical oscillation, limited computing capability of processors, etc.), a converter-based hardware test-bed was developed at CURENT for real-time power grid emulation. However, distribution systems especially microgrids cannot be emulated and tested on the existing hardware test-bed. This paper develops a microgrid test-bed based on the existing hardware test-bed to enable controller testing for microgrids with dynamic boundary. The design and realization of the microgrid hardware test-bed are introduced. The experimental results of the microgrid controller tests are also provided.
Li, Dingrui↗
Dual control vibration tests of flight hardware
A vibration retest of a spacecraft flight instrument, the Mars Observer Camera (MOC), was conducted using extremal dual control to automatically limit the shaker force and notch the shaker acceleration at resonances. This was the first application of extremal dual control with flight hardware at JPL. The retest was successful in that the environment was representative of flight plus some margin, the instrument survived without any structural or performance degradation, and the force limiting worked very well. The test set-up, force limiting procedure, and test results are described herein. It is concluded that dual control should be utilized when there is a concern about overtesting in hard-base-drive tests and the instrumentation for force measurement and control is available. Recommendations for improving the implementation of dual control are provided as a result of this first experience.
Scharton, Terry D.↗
Hardware Fault Simulator Generates Test Vectors For Complex IC's
Report describes technique using fault simulator implemented entirely in hardware to generate and optimize test vectors for microprocessor. Hardware fault simulator approach reduces test time, while maintaining high reliability in detecting faults.
Timoc, C. C.↗
Simulator verification techniques study. Integrated simulator self test system concepts
Software and hardware requirements for implementing hardware self tests are presented in support of the development of training and procedures development simulators for the space shuttle program. Self test techniques for simulation hardware and the validation of simulation performance are stipulated. The requirements of an integrated simulator self system are analyzed. Readiness tests, fault isolation tests, and incipient fault detection tests are covered.
Montoya, G.↗
Verification Challenges of Dynamic Testing of Space Flight Hardware
The Six Degree-of-Freedom Dynamic Test System (SDTS) is a test facility at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas for performing dynamic verification of space structures and hardware. Some examples of past and current tests include the verification of on-orbit robotic inspection systems, space vehicle assembly procedures and docking/berthing systems. The facility is able to integrate a dynamic simulation of on-orbit spacecraft mating or demating using flight-like mechanical interface hardware. A force moment sensor is utilized for input to the simulation during the contact phase, thus simulating the contact dynamics. While the verification of flight hardware presents many unique challenges, one particular area of interest is with respect to the use of external measurement systems to ensure accurate feedback of dynamic contact. There are many commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) measurement systems available on the market, and the test facility measurement systems have evolved over time to include two separate COTS systems. The first system incorporates infra-red sensing cameras, while the second system employs a laser interferometer to determine position and orientation data. The specific technical challenges with the measurement systems in a large dynamic environment include changing thermal and humidity levels, operational area and measurement volume, dynamic tracking, and data synchronization. The facility is located in an expansive high-bay area that is occasionally exposed to outside temperature when large retractable doors at each end of the building are opened. The laser interferometer system, in particular, is vulnerable to the environmental changes in the building. The operational area of the test facility itself is sizeable, ranging from seven meters wide and five meters deep to as much as seven meters high. Both facility measurement systems have desirable measurement volumes and the accuracies vary within the respective volumes. In addition, because this is a dynamic facility with a moving test bed, direct line-of-sight may not be available at all times between the measurement sensors and the tracking targets. Finally, the feedback data from the active test bed along with the two external measurement systems must be synchronized to allow for data correlation. To ensure the desired accuracy and resolution of these systems, calibration of the systems must be performed regularly. New innovations in sensor technology itself are periodically incorporated into the facility s overall measurement scheme. In addressing the challenges of the measurement systems, the facility is able to provide essential position and orientation data to verify the dynamic performance of space flight hardware.
Winnitoy, Susan↗
Phase 2 program on ground test of refanned JT8D turbofan engines and nacelles for the 727 airplane. Volume 1: Summary
The propulsion performance, acoustic, structural, and systems changes to a 727-200 airplane retrofitted with a refan modification of the JT8D turbofan engine are evaluated. Model tests, design of certifiable airplane retrofit kit hardware, manufacture of test hardware, ground test of a current production JT8D engine, followed by test of the same engine modified to the refan configuration, detailed analyses of the retrofit impact on airplane airworthiness, performance, and noise, and a preliminary analysis of retrofit costs are included. Results indicate that the refan retrofit of the 727-200 would be certifiable and would result in a 6-to 8 EPNdb reduction in effective perceived noise level (EPNL) at the FAR 36 measuring points and an annoyance-weighted footprint area reduction of 68% to 83%. The installed refan engine is estimated to provide 14% greater takeoff thrust at zero velocity and 10% greater thrust at 100 kn (51.4 m/s). There would be an approximate 0.6% increase in cruise specific fuel consumption (SFC). The refan engine performance in conjunction with the increase in stalled weight results in a range reduction of approximately 15% over the unmodified airplane at the same brake release gross weight (BRGW), with a block fuel increase of 1.5% to 3%. With the particular model 727 that was studied, however, it is possible to operate the airplane (with minor structural modifications) at a higher BRGW and increase the range up to approximately 15% relative to the nonrefanned airplane (with equal or slightly increased noise levels). The JT8D refan engine also improves the limited-field range of the airplane.
Source record↗
Hardware-In-The-Loop Testing of Continuous Control Algorithms for a Precision Formation Flying Demonstration Mission
A sample mission sequence is defined for a low earth orbit demonstration of Precision Formation Flying (PFF). Various guidance navigation and control strategies are discussed for use in the PFF experiment phases. A sample PFF experiment is implemented and tested in a realistic Hardware-in-the-Loop (HWIL) simulation using the Formation Flying Test Bed (FFTB) at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.
Naasz, Bo J.↗
Environmental Testing of Flight Hardware in the 25 ft. Space Simulator at JPL in a Manual Mode
After receiving global admiration for the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is planning to embark upon another mobile mission to the red planet in the year 2020. Currently, the working name given to this sophisticated next-generation rover is Mars 2020. Mars 2020 will boast a multitude of newly developed instruments to aid in the scientific study of Mars. This paper will describe the process of testing one of the Mars 2020 instruments in the 25 ft. Space Simulator. The testing was performed at Mars CO2 atmospheric pressure of 7 Torr and consisted of multiple chamber evacuations and backfills. The Programmable Logic Control (PLC) system for the chamber was in the middle of a major overhaul that resulted in utilizing the manual Hand/Off/Auto switches to operate the chamber. Accomplishing this challenging task required the meticulous development of new operating procedures and thorough training of the chamber’s operators.
Ovcharenko, Anton↗
Tutorial: Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Approaches for Modeling and Electrical Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing
This tutorial session outlines capabilities made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for testing electrified aircraft propulsion (EAP) hardware and software prior to using turbomachinery. Removing these components from the experimentation process until necessary significantly reduces the development and testing costs and safety risks. Three facilities, the NASA Electric Aircraft Testbed (NEAT) and the Hybrid Propulsion Emulation Rig (HyPER) are unique facilities that provide the following capabilities: (i) the verification of megawatt-scale electrical and electromechanical system components at altitude, (ii) the verification of EAP control systems on sub-scale representative electromechanical architectures. The importance, operation, and specifications of each facility is described with detail. Provided examples of past testing showcase the abilities of each facility. Simple and complex methods for replicating the steady state and dynamical mechanical loading on the electrical power system are discussed
Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗
Gravity gradient stabilization system for the applications technology satellite. Volume 2, book 1 - Hardware development and test Final technical report
Gravity gradient stabilization system for Applications Technology Satellites - boom subsystem and combination passive damper
Source record↗
Gravity gradient stabilization system for the applications technology satellite. Volume 2, book 2 - Hardware development and test Final technical report
Gravity gradient stabilization system for Applications Technology Satellites - TV camera, solar aspect and RF attitude sensors, and manufacturing and quality control processes
Source record↗
Simulation test beds for the space station electrical power system
NASA Lewis Research Center and its prime contractor are responsible for developing the electrical power system on the space station. The power system will be controlled by a network of distributed processors. Control software will be verified, validated, and tested in hardware and software test beds. Current plans for the software test bed involve using real time and nonreal time simulations of the power system. This paper will discuss the general simulation objectives and configurations, control architecture, interfaces between simulator and controls, types of tests, and facility configurations.
Sadler, Gerald G.↗
Simulation test beds for the Space Station electrical power system
NASA Lewis Research Center and its prime contractor are respnsible for developing the electrical power system on the Space Station. The power system will be controlled by a network of distributed processors. Control software will be verified, validated, and tested in hardware and software test beds. Current plans for the software test bed involve using real time and nonreal time simulations of the power system. This paper will discuss the general simulation objectives and configurations, control architecture, interfaces between simulator and controls, types of tests, and facility configurations.
Sadler, Gerald G.↗