SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Piperazine”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Structural basis of the UDP-diacylglucosamine pyrophosphohydrolase LpxH inhibition by sulfonyl piperazine antibiotics
The UDP-2,3-diacylglucosamine pyrophosphate hydrolase LpxH is an essential lipid A biosynthetic enzyme that is conserved in the majority of gram-negative bacteria. It has emerged as an attractive novel antibiotic target due to the recent discovery of an LpxH-targeting sulfonyl piperazine compound (referred to as AZ1) by AstraZeneca. However, the molecular details of AZ1 inhibition have remained unresolved, stymieing further development of this class of antibiotics. In this paper we report the crystal structure of Klebsiella pneumoniae LpxH in complex with AZ1. We show that AZ1 fits snugly into the L -shaped acyl chain-binding chamber of LpxH with its indoline ring situating adjacent to the active site, its sulfonyl group adopting a sharp kink, and its N -CF 3 –phenyl substituted piperazine group reaching out to the far side of the LpxH acyl chain-binding chamber. Intriguingly, despite the observation of a single AZ1 conformation in the crystal structure, our solution NMR investigation has revealed the presence of a second ligand conformation invisible in the crystalline state. Together, these distinct ligand conformations delineate a cryptic inhibitor envelope that expands the observed footprint of AZ1 in the LpxH-bound crystal structure and enables the design of AZ1 analogs with enhanced potency in enzymatic assays. These designed compounds display striking improvement in antibiotic activity over AZ1 against wild-type K. pneumoniae , and coadministration with outer membrane permeability enhancers profoundly sensitizes Escherichia coli to designed LpxH inhibitors. Remarkably, none of the sulfonyl piperazine compounds occupies the active site of LpxH, foretelling a straightforward path for rapid optimization of this class of antibiotics.
Design and Evaluation of Pyridinyl Sulfonyl Piperazine LpxH Inhibitors with Potent Antibiotic Activity Against Enterobacterales
Enterobacterales, a large order of Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, are major causes of urinary tract and gastrointestinal infections, pneumonia, and other diseases in healthcare settings and communities. ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales can break down commonly used antibiotics, with some strains being resistant to all available antibiotics. This public health threat necessitates the development of novel antibiotics, ideally targeting new pathways in these bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria possess an outer membrane enriched with lipid A, a saccharolipid that serves as the membrane anchor of lipopolysaccharides and the active component of the bacterial endotoxin, causing septic shock. The biosynthesis of lipid A is crucial for the viability of Gram-negative bacteria, and as an essential enzyme in this process, LpxH has emerged as a promising target for developing novel antibiotics against multidrugresistant Gram-negative pathogens. Here, we report the development of pyridinyl sulfonyl piperazine LpxH inhibitors. Among them, ortho-substituted pyridinyl compounds significantly boost LpxH inhibition and antibiotic activity over the original phenyl series. Structural and QM/MM analyses reveal that these improved activities are primarily due to the enhanced interaction between F141 of the LpxH insertion lid and the pyridinyl group. Incorporation of the N-methyl-N-phenyl-methanesulfonamide moiety into the pyridinyl sulfonyl piperazine backbone results in JHLPH- 106 and JH-LPH-107, both of which exhibit potent antibiotic activity against wild-type Enterobacterales such as K. pneumoniae and E. coli. JH-LPH-107 exhibits a low rate of spontaneous resistance and a high safety window in vitro, rendering it an excellent lead for further clinical development.
Effects of carbon treating on piperazine oxidation in pilot plant testing of PZAS™
From February to June 2019, a pilot plant campaign was run for 2100 h at the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) using moderately degraded 5 m PZ with simulated flue gas equivalent to a 0.64 MW natural gas combined cycle. Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper™ (PZAS™) and a baghouse were used, and N 2 sparging was applied at the bottom of the absorber. A carbon bed was activated and showed beneficial effects in removing degradation products and reducing the oxidation rate. The cumulative NH 3 production was 180 mmol/k, indicating a PZ oxidation rate of 0.07 mmol/kg/h (0.3 kg PZ/tonne of CO 2 ). The total formate before turning on the carbon bed was 41 mmol/kg, and the total Fe was 0.1 mmol/kg. Carbon treating reduced NH3 production from 0.1 mmol/kg/h to 0.056 mmol/kg/h after 400 h of operation, reduced the UV-Vis absorbance of the samples at 320 nm, and caused a decrease of dissolved Cr. Bench-scale experiments were performed using the NCCC solvent and the same type of carbon. In bench-scale experiments, the UV-Vis absorbance and the concentration of Fe, Mn, and Cr all decreased. Finally, a linear equilibrium relationship was observed between the UV-Vis absorbance and the carbon loading.
Energy use of piperazine with the advanced stripper from pilot plant testing
Here, piperazine with the Advanced Stripper (PZAS™) was tested at the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) at coal and NGCC conditions. Energy performance was measured with accounting for heat loss. The net heat duty was found to be identical at 2.45 GJ/tonne for both 4 and 12% CO 2 at 90% CO 2 removal. The average measured heat loss was 0.38 GJ/tonne and represented 30% of the gross heat rate. For PZAS, the warm rich piping before the control valve is the largest in surface area. Heat loss at this location increased heat duty by 80% of the heat loss value. Therefore, the total heat duty was decreased by 80% of the heat loss. The Independence™ model was validated using 112 steady-state pilot plant runs and predicted average net heat duty with an error of 9% and lean loading with an error of 10%. The model was used to simulate process impacts of heat loss for the PZAS and simple stripper configurations. For both strippers, heat loss was found to impact heat duty at locations other than just the steam heater. While heat loss in the steam heater was the most important for PZAS, heat loss in the column was the most important for the simple stripper due to a large top-side pinch and CO 2 reabsorption at the same location. CO 2 reabsorption in PZAS occurred only at high heat loss values (~0.14 GJ/hr), compared to low heat loss values (~ 0.03 GJ/hr) in the PZ-simple stripper. Excessive packing in the PZ-simple stripper caused a large top-side pinch at 0.23 mol/mol lean loading, making the column very sensitive to heat loss. Heat loss in the PZ-simple stripper increased heat duty by 120–150% at typical heat loss values and lean loading of 0.23 mol/mol. Heat loss in the MEA-simple stripper only increased heat duty by 1–13% in a typical lean loading range of 0.1–0.2 mol/mol. A large bottom side pinch at low lean loading for 7 m MEA made the effect of heat loss less pronounced.
Creative absorber design and optimization for CO 2 capture with aqueous piperazine
The Texas Carbon Management Program is preparing a Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) of the PZASTM (Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper TM ) for CO 2 capture at a natural gas combined cycle power plant in West Texas. This paper develops the absorber design for the capture system and studies the operational strategies of the absorber in response to ambient temperature swing. The design uses 2 absorber trains, and each train integrates absorption and a water-wash section in one column. Each column has a cross-section area of 174 m 2 and consists of 3 sections of MellapakPlus® 252Y structured packing. Packing heights for each section are 3, 4.9, and 2.7 m from top to bottom. A pump-around intercooler applied at the bottom bed circulates solvent and eliminates the direct contact cooler. The baseline CO 2 removal rate is 90% and will vary between 78% and 90% with ambient temperature. The system uses air cooling to eliminate cooling water usage. The water balance in the system will be managed by operating the water wash at a high circulation rate (1300 kg/h) to condense water during the night and make up for water loss during the day. Finally, the proposed design reduces the capital cost of the absorber column by minimizing the packing height and eliminating the direct contact cooler (DCC), and improves the energy cost by lowering the pump-around intercooling temperature and increasing the pump-around rate.
Process design of the piperazine advanced stripper for a 460 MW NGCC
The Texas Carbon Management Program is conducting a Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) for Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper™ (PZAS™) at a natural gas combined cycle power plant in west Texas. Here, this paper presents the design of the advanced stripper system with an emphasis on the selection of packing type, packing height, column diameter, and heat exchanger size, demonstrates the effect of ambient temperature swing on the regeneration energy requirement, and investigates two alternate process configurations that provide better energy performance than PZAS™. The design uses 2 stripper trains, and each train uses two cold cross exchangers, one hot cross exchanger, a stripper column, a CO 2 exchanger, and a condenser. Each column consists of two sections of random packing with RSR 2 packing at the top and RSR 3 packing at the bottom, with a total packed height of 7.5 m. The cold exchanger was designed with an NTU of 6, the hot exchanger with an NTU of 2, and the CO 2 exchanger with an NTU of 5. At 0.4 rich loading and 0.2 lean loading, this design resulted in a heat duty of 2.85 GJ/tonne CO 2 . The heat duty can vary up to 3.1 GJ/tonne CO 2 due to lower rich loading at higher summer temperature, but the absolute steam requirement is 8–15% lower in the summer. An alternate design, PZAS with hot rich bypass, is proposed, which can reduce the equivalent work of stripping by 1.5–3.5% compared to PZAS at low heat exchanger size, due to a reduction in stripper driving force. Using a hot rich bypass increases the vapor fraction of the total rich bypass stream from 0.3 to 1 mol% compared to using the warm rich bypass, which also contributes to a reduction in lost work in the column. PZAS with hot rich bypass outperforms PZAS in energy requirement below a packing height of 15 m, but fails to do so above 15 m of packing due to a column pinch that results in little change in LMTD of the column. PZAS with hot rich bypass has the potential to minimize capital cost in addition to reducing energy requirement as it requires less packing to strip CO 2 than PZAS and requires only one cross exchanger with 8 heat transfer units.
Role of carbon treating in piperazine oxidation
Bench-scale experiments were performed to test the effects of carbon treating (8 × 30 mesh, lignite-based granular activated carbon from Nowata Filtration) on the oxidation of aqueous piperazine (PZ) at conditions of CO 2 capture. The combined mitigation with carbon treating and N 2 sparging was also tested. When carbon treating is applied, the UV–Vis absorbance at 320 nm, the NH 3 production rate, and the accumulation rate of dissolved Fe concentration and total formate concentration decrease. The effects of carbon treating last even when the carbon is bypassed, which is possibly due to the removal of catalytic degradation products. Therefore, it is better to apply carbon treating in the early stages of oxidation. Combining carbon treating and nitrogen sparging is more effective in oxidation mitigation than applying the methods separately. The amount of Fe removed by the carbon bed is greater than the result calculated from the solvent inventory and concentration difference of Fe in solvent, indicating that Fe colloids or other “soluble” Fe will dissolve into the solvent and replace the dissolved Fe that is adsorbed and removed. Furthermore, the carbon removes the degradation products that can complex with Fe 3+ , even if they are not complexed. Since the source of Fe includes fly ash and corrosion, removing the complexing agents instead of all the available Fe is a more feasible target.
Cost details from front-end engineering design of piperazine with the advanced stripper
This Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to estimate the cost to capture and compress 90% of the CO 2 from an existing natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) in Denver City, Texas, USA. The FEED used the PZAS (Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper) 2G amine scrubbing technology developed and modeled by The University of Texas at Austin. This FEED is unique in providing more public cost details than other FEEDs funded by DOE. The primary objective of the FEED was to provide a comprehensive estimate for the total installed cost of the capture plant. The estimated capital cost of NGCC at the Mustang Station is $\$727$ million for a capacity of 460 MW and 1.6 million tonnes CO 2 /yr. This includes a contingency of $\$104.6$ million and a contractor’s profit of $\$60.1$ million. The total direct field cost is $\$384.1$ million. With an optimistic fuel value of $\$3$/MMBtu, the estimated cost of capture varies from $\$85$/t at 4% IRR/85% load to $\$170$/t at 10% IRR/52% load. Air cooling is technically feasible but expensive. The air cooling systems for the water wash and pump-around intercooling account for 23.4% of the direct cost. The gas-fired boilers represent only 4% of the direct costs, but steam extraction would reduce energy cost, free up cooling water, and reduce the direct costs of processing additional flue gas and CO 2 from the boilers. The absorbers represent 9.6% of the direct cost in this FEED with no direct contact cooler and only 7.6 m of packing. Furthermore, the solvent cross exchangers are less expensive than expected (2.5% of direct costs). Doubling the number of these exchangers could reduce the heat duty from 3.0 to 2.5 GJ/t CO 2 .
Front-End Engineering Design for Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper
This Department of Energy (DOE) funded project was executed with the goal of preparing a Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) for the capture and compression of 90% of the CO2 that would normally be emitted from an existing natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plant. The FEED focused on the application of the piperazine advanced stripper (PZAS) process at Mustang Station of the Golden Spread Electric Cooperative (GSEC), which consists of two gas turbines with common heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). The University of Texas at Austin (UT) served as the prime contractor, and subcontracted AECOM Technical Services and Trimeric Corporation to support FEED development. This project team has worked together to advance PZAS for more than a decade. ExxonMobil, Chevron, and Total provided project co-funding. The objectives of this work included: 1. To advance engineering design such that a comprehensive estimate for the total installed cost of a full-scale PZAS CO2 Capture Plant with CO2 compression can be developed on an existing NGCC power plant. a. These detailed costs can also be used to qualify PZAS and other related second generation (2G) amine scrubbing processes for use on cogeneration facilities in refineries and chemical plants that use gas turbines with HRSGs to produce steam. b. These detailed costs will help qualify 2G amine scrubbing for use on NGCC power plants and establish a more accurate baseline cost to be used as a target by other capture technologies. 2. To provide cost details to be used in the economic optimization of the process features of PZAS and other 2G amine scrubbing processes. 3. To provide DOE with a more detailed understanding of carbon capture costs in a commercial application, enabling DOE to better design its R&D program to improve the economics for carbon capture. 4. To provide the host site and cost share partners with the information necessary to determine whether a commercial project to capture and use CO2 for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) or for sequestration can be justified (when accounting for the 45Q tax credit). A key component of the FEED is the estimated total installed cost, which provides a basis for the likely capital investment necessary to implement the PZAS carbon capture process at this location and scale. In combination with the included economic analysis, which accounts for potential revenue from the produced CO2, potential avenues to profitability are explored. The major findings of the FEED are as follows: The Mustang Station PZAS CO2 Capture Plant estimated total project cost of $698 MM of which $384 MM was direct costs. The annual operating costs were $32.6 MM. The total investment for a PZAS facility at Mustang Station is $725 MM. This estimate includes owner’s cost of $25 million and a contingency of $110 MM. • The study estimated the CO2 capture plant at Mustang Station would generate CO2 at $110/tonne for EOR, assuming a 12% IRR (internal rate of return) and an 85% capacity factor. For CO2 storage, the same case would achieve a 12% IRR at about $114/tonne. At a capacity factor of 52%, the storage and EOR cases would break even when carbon is priced ~$150/tonne. The economic analysis determined that the capacity factor and utility pricing, among other variable factors, had a significant effect on the economics and will need additional studied. • The energy penalty of the PZAS plant would be about 46 MW in connected power and 35 MW in operating load. The natural gas requirement (for the Gas Boiler package) would be about 354 MMBTU/hr. • The FEED revealed no major risks in process maturity. However, some areas were outlined for further engineering during detailed design, which included the Gas Boiler system, general arrangement and site layout, air coolers, schedule development, and optimization of the process for higher CO2 removal. • If PZAS were to be implemented at another host site, additional opportunities for cost reduction for would include cost reduction through use of cooling water and steam extraction.
Construction of Fluorine- and Piperazine-Engineered Covalent Triazine Frameworks Towards Enhanced Dual-Ion Positive Electrode Performance
Organic positive electrodes featuring lightweight, and tunable energy storage modes by molecular structure engineering have promising application prospects in dual-ion batteries. Herein, a series of highly porous covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) were synthesized under ionothermal conditions using fluorinated aromatic nitrile monomers containing a piperazine ring. Fluorinated monomers can result in more defects in CTFs, leading to a higher surface area up to 2515 m 2 /g and a higher N content of 11.34 wt% compared to the products from the non-fluorinated monomer. The high surface area and abundant redox sites of these CTFs afforded high specific capacities (up to 279 mAh/g at 0.1 A/g), excellent rate performance (89 mAh/g at 5 A/g), and durable cycling performance (92.3% retention rate after 500 cycles at 2.0 A g -1 ) as dual-ion positive electrodes
Vapor liquid equilibrium of pure and aqueous Methyl diethanolamine (MDEA), 2-Dimethylmonoethanolamine (DMMEA), N-Methylmonoethanolamine (MMEA) and 1-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine (AEP): Experimental results and modeling
This work presents new vapor-liquid data for the pure components 2-dimethylmonoethanolamine (DMMEA) and N-methylethanolamine (MMEA) and for the binary systems of aqueous methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), DMMEA, MMEA, and 1-(2-aminoethyl)piperazine (AEP). New Antoine models are developed for the pure component systems, and new and improved NRTL models for the binary systems. In the model development, together with new data from this work, all available data on VLE, excess heat of mixing, H E , freezing point depression, and specific heat were gathered, evaluated and used selectively for parameter optimization. Emphasis has been put on a best possible representation of amine volatility to enable reasonable predictions of amine emissions from absorption plants and to form a basis for subsequent models of ternary systems with CO 2 . In conclusion, model predictions are compared with experimental results and other models, source by source, and the overall results are satisfactory.
Stainless and carbon steel corrosion in aqueous piperazine at absorber and water wash conditions
Corrosion of carbon steel (C1010) and stainless steels (304, 316L, 430) was measured at absorber and water wash conditions at the bench scale. Corrosion rate decreases with increasing concentration of piperazine (PZ). With more than 0.003 m PZ in solution, carbon steel has acceptable corrosion performance. Corrosion of carbon steel increases with increasing partial pressure of CO2, suggesting loading is another dominant parameter. The effect is more significant for dilute PZ; therefore, untreated flue gas with high CO2 content should be avoided in the water wash. Temperature has a less significant effect than PZ concentration and loading. Carbon steel corrosion increases with increasing flow velocity at both absorber and water wash conditions
Purification of Degraded Aqueous Piperazine by Ion Exchange and Carbon Treating
Amine purification by ion exchange and carbon treating has been performed for decades to maintain low solvent impurity levels in amines used in natural gas sweetening. The use of these purification methods to remove dissolved metal catalysts and other impurities from amines used in post-combustion carbon capture is less well known. This report presents batch experiments testing the equilibrium adsorption of impurities from degraded piperazine (PZ) onto activated carbon and various ion exchange resins. Compared to cationic exchange, anionic exchange was found to better remove catalytic Fe and UV active species, making it a better candidate for large-scale PZ purification. Carbon treating greatly outperforms anion exchange in the removal of UV active species, but the adsorbents’ difference is less pronounced for the removal of other impurities. Equilibrium adsorption was determined by the UV absorption of the PZ solution at 320 nm, and the results will show this may not be an accurate way to determine equilibrium. Further bench-scale experiments comparing ion exchange and carbon treating are necessary before advancing to larger-scale testing.
Quarterly Technical Progress Report Piperazine Advanced Stripper (PZAS™) Front End Engineering Design
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document summarizes the status of Cooperative Agreement DE-FE0031844, “Piperazine Advanced Stripper (PZAS™) Front-End Engineering Design,” during the reporting period of January 1 through March 31, 2020. The objective of this project is to develop accurate installed costs by conducting a Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) of PZAS™ at Golden Spread Electric Cooperative’s (GSEC) Mustang Station located in Denver City, TX. Complementary benefits include positioning the technology for a commercial project with the 45Q tax credits, qualifying PZAS™ for use on a Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Cogen facility, and to provide cost detail to optimize PZAS™ and help guide R&D of second-generation solvent CO2 capture technologies. Results from the FEED will be used to evaluate the economic feasibility of the process at Mustang Station. This project is funded by the U.S. DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory under the aforementioned Cooperative Agreement. Exxon, Total, Chevron, UOP-Honeywell, and the University of Texas (UT) are project co-funders. AECOM and Trimeric are project team members; UT is the prime contractor. Summary of Progress Cooperative Agreement DE-FE0031844 was established in October 2019. The current reporting period, January 1 through March 31, 2020, is the second technical progress reporting period for the project. Several milestones were accomplished during this reporting period, including: • Kickoff Meeting with DOE on February 3, 2020. • Kickoff Meeting with GSEC on March 30, 2020. (Note: Due to Covid-19 travel restrictions and shelter-in-place guidelines, the kickoff meeting was conducted remotely via videoconferencing. See attached notes from that telecon.) • Updated Project Management Plan March 2020, submitted with this quarterly report Other activities during the quarter included progress on contracting and other legal agreements (e.g., non-disclosure agreements), internal kickoff meetings at both AECOM and Trimeric, and development of a Technical Implementation Plan (TIP). The TIP will help the team to make critical, early process decisions and, ultimately, to develop a project and process design basis. Note that all agreements between project team participants are complete as of this submittal, except the vendor agreement with Kiewit (steam cycle modeling). Plans for Next Reporting Period Activities during the next reporting period (April 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020) include: the completion of the Project Design Basis and progress towards the Process Design Basis/Process Design Package (PDP). The Project Design Basis is due as a deliverable and milestone during the next reporting period.
Mitigation Methods for Piperazine Oxidation in Post-Combustion Carbon Capture
Piperazine is a promising second-generation solvent for amine scrubbing in post-combustion CO2 capture. However, the oxidative degradation of PZ can cause environmental problems and economic loss. This work presents the effects of two mitigation methods: carbon treating and N2 sparging, on the PZ oxidation in long-term operations. The species and their respective quantities adsorbed by the activated carbon were tested in a bench-scale device. The carbon was then tested in the High Temperature Oxidation Reactor (HTOR), where the solvent oxidizes at a reasonably fast rate. Pilot plant campaigns were also performed at the UT Austin SRP and the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) and the effects were verified. When dissolved Fe is removed by carbon treating or other methods, available soluble Fe in the system dissolves and replaces the dissolved Fe. Therefore, all available Fe and ligands need to be removed for the mitigation to be effective. The sources of soluble Fe include fly ash and the corrosion of stainless steel, and the ligands are degradation products. 8 All PZ degraded solvents have two absorbance peaks at 320 nm and 538 nm. The 320 nm peak is caused by dissolved metals, especially Fe, complexed by degradation products. The 320 nm peak is related to the amine degradation level and can be used as a simple and efficient method to estimate the amine degradation rate. The pilot plant data suggest that NO2 can oxidize PZ significantly, possibly through radical reactions. 0.01 mmol/kg-hr absorption of NO2 increased the PZ oxidation rate from 1.2 mmol/kg-hr to 2.5 mmol/kg-hr.
Corrosion of Stainless and Carbon Steel in Aqueous Piperazine for CO2 Capture
Current obstacles that prevent commercial implementation of amine-scrubbing CO2 capture are the high costs. Reducing capital costs by appropriate selection of construction materials, which requires knowledge of material corrosion performance for the process, will improve the economic feasibility of this technology. Corrosion was evaluated in three pilot plant campaigns using aqueous piperazine with the Advanced Stripper (PZAS). 316L stainless steel (SS) experienced higher corrosion than 304 SS and 2205 duplex SS, and the corrosion rate showed strong dependence on the temperature. 304 and 2205 performed well at all locations and should be good construction materials for PZAS. Degraded PZ exacerbated 316L corrosion, and removal of PZ degradation products using a carbon adsorption bed significantly reduced corrosion. Carbon steel (CS) corrosion showed a weak temperature effect because the corrosion was more dependent on the protective siderite film. The protectiveness of the films was related to fluid velocity. Ni-based alloys corroded in PZ, and the rate increased with temperature. Corrosion of C1010 CS and SS (304, 316L, 430) was measured at absorber and water wash conditions on the bench-scale. Corrosion rate decreases with increasing PZ. 8 With more than 0.003 m PZ in solution, CS has acceptable corrosion performance. Corrosion of CS increases with increasing partial pressure of CO2, suggesting loading is another dominant parameter for carbon steel corrosion. Temperature has a less significant effect than PZ concentration and loading. CS corrosion increases with increasing flow velocity at both absorber and water wash conditions. SS had little corrosion at this lower temperature. Performance of siderite (FeCO3) protective films on CS was studied at representative stripper conditions on the bench-scale. Siderite films can deposit on the surface of CS in CO2-loaded PZ solution at temperatures >100 °C and protect CS from corrosion. The protection may fail in degraded PZ. Ethylenediamine (EDA) is one of the major contributors for the loss of film protectiveness or can be the surrogate for the effect of PZ degradation on siderite film protection. A link between protectiveness and the apparent density of siderite films was discovered. The apparent density of siderite films decreases with increasing flow velocity and decreasing CO2 loading, resulting in higher corrosion of CS.
Modeling Advanced Strippers for CO2 Capture from Gas-Fired Power Plants using Aqueous Piperazine
Energy performance of 5 m piperazine was evaluated with an advanced stripper at the pilot scale, accounting for heat loss. Modeling studies indicated that heat loss at locations other than the heat source impacted the heat duty. For strippers with excess packing, the column was the most important source of heat loss, and values as low as 0.03 GJ/hr can cause pinch and reabsorption of CO2. Solvents like 5 m PZ are more affected by heat loss in the column due to a top-side temperature pinch at high lean loading. Heat loss impacts NGCC CO2 capture more than coal-based CO2 capture. Surface temperature measurements pilot plants showed that heat loss was 50-75% controlled by natural convection. Measured heat loss was correlated with steam flowrate and wind speed and ranged from 8126 to 219668 Btu/hr, representing 35% of the measured heat rate on average. Net heat duty linearly varied with CO2 removal at low lean loading and was similar for coal and NGCC conditions at fixed removal. At 90% removal, net heat duty was about 2.5 GJ/t with 4 and 12% CO2 in the flue gas. 7 At NGCC conditions, strippers with finite packing can benefit from a flashing feed to the top of the column by using a hot bypass. A flashing feed was linked to a reduction in irreversibility of the stripper from temperature driving forces. It also reduces heat duty by up to 6% at fixed packing height and reduces packing requirement for a fixed steam heater size compared to a warm bypass. Lean loading and lean solvent rate were effective handles to maximize profitability of a fixed stripper design at low gas price. High ambient temperature operation can benefit from low pressure stripping to about 0.18 lean loading at 150 ℃ to maintain the cyclic capacity at reduced rich loading. At low gas price, the capture plant was able to maximize profitability even with a high heat duty of 2.7-3.1 GJ/t at a lean loading of 0.2-0.22 mol/mol. Heat recovery by partial water vapor condensation in a gas-liquid exchanger can be replaced by a direct contact condenser (DCC). The DCC improved gas cooling and reduced heat duty compared to the CO2 exchanger at 0.2 lean loading. The DCC when used with a 150 ℃/5.5 bar stripper can reduce the cost of capture compared to the base case by $3- 4/tonne at 15 ft of packing (optimum) but increases cost of capture by $6/tonne with a 120 ℃/2 bar stripper and 10 ft of packing (optimum). The DCC can work effectively with a solvent with a high heat of absorption and thermal stability.